From Data to Discovery: A Comprehensive Guide to Visualizing Omics Data with Volcano Plots

Abstract

This guide provides researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals with a complete framework for leveraging volcano plots in the analysis of omics data. It covers foundational principles, from interpreting log-fold change and statistical significance to advanced applications like pathway-guided visualization for biological interpretation. The article details practical methodologies using popular tools like R/Shiny and Galaxy, addresses common troubleshooting and optimization challenges with large datasets, and explores the role of volcano plots in multi-omics validation and integration. By combining statistical rigor with biological context, this resource empowers scientists to transform complex differential expression data into actionable insights for biomarker discovery and therapeutic development.

Understanding Volcano Plots: Core Principles for Interpreting Omics Data

Core Concept and Definition

A volcano plot is a specialized type of scatter plot widely used in statistics and omics research (e.g., genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics) to quickly identify meaningful changes in large data sets composed of replicate measurements [1]. It provides a powerful, concise visual summary of differential analysis results, enabling researchers to pinpoint the most biologically significant features—such as genes or proteins—that exhibit both large magnitude changes and high statistical significance between two conditions [2].

The plot derives its name from its characteristic two-arm shape, which resembles a volcano eruption. This pattern emerges because the x-axis data (log2-fold changes) typically follow a normal distribution, while the y-axis data (-log10p-values) form a parabolic shape as fold changes deviate more strongly from zero [1].

Anatomical Breakdown: The Axes and Their Interpretation

The X-Axis: Log2(Fold Change)

• Purpose and Calculation: The x-axis represents the magnitude of change between two experimental conditions, specifically the logarithm base 2 of the fold change (Log2FC) [1] [3]. A fold change of 2 (upregulated) becomes Log2(2) = 1, while a fold change of 0.5 (downregulated) becomes Log2(0.5) = -1.
• Biological Significance: This logarithmic transformation ensures an symmetric representation where equivalent upregulation and downregulation are equidistant from the origin (zero) [1].
• Interpretation:
  • Positive values indicate upregulation in the condition of interest compared to the control/reference condition. These data points appear on the right side of the plot [4].
  • Negative values indicate downregulation and appear on the left side of the plot [4].
  • The further a point is from zero, the greater the magnitude of change.

The Y-Axis: -log10(P-value)

• Purpose and Calculation: The y-axis represents the statistical significance of the observed changes, plotted as the negative logarithm base 10 of the p-value [1] [3]. A p-value of 0.01 becomes -log10(0.01) = 2, and a p-value of 0.000001 becomes -log10(0.000001) = 6.
• Statistical Significance: This transformation ensures that:
  • Lower (more significant) p-values appear higher on the y-axis [2].
  • The scale expands the visualization of small p-values, making truly significant results stand out more clearly.
• Interpretation:
  • Points higher on the y-axis represent findings that are less likely to occur by chance.
  • The most statistically significant features cluster toward the top of the plot.

Integrated Interpretation

The power of the volcano plot lies in combining these two dimensions, creating four distinct regions of interest:

• Top-right quadrant: Features with significant upregulation (high Log2FC, low p-value).
• Top-left quadrant: Features with significant downregulation (low Log2FC, low p-value).
• Bottom-central region: Non-significant features with small fold changes and/or high p-values [4].
• Upper extremes: The most promising candidates for further investigation—features displaying both substantial effect size and exceptional statistical significance [1].

The following diagram illustrates the logical relationship between differential analysis results and the final volcano plot visualization:

Standard Significance Thresholds and Conventions

To systematically identify significant features, researchers apply specific thresholds on both the fold change and statistical significance. The table below summarizes commonly used cut-offs in volcano plot interpretation:

Parameter	Typical Threshold	Biological/Statistical Meaning	Visual Representation
Fold Change (Log2FC)	|Log2FC| > 1 [2]	Equivalent to a 2-fold change in expression; indicates a meaningful biological effect	Vertical dashed lines at x = -1 and x = +1
P-value	< 0.05 [3]	Statistical significance; less than 5% probability the observed change is due to chance	Horizontal dashed line at y = -log10(0.05) ≈ 1.3
False Discovery Rate (FDR)	< 0.01 [2]	More stringent statistical control for multiple testing; 1% of significant results are expected to be false positives	Horizontal dashed line at y = -log10(0.01) = 2

Features that surpass both the fold change and significance thresholds (located in the upper-left and upper-right corners beyond the dashed lines) are considered candidate biomarkers or differentially expressed features worthy of further investigation [2] [3].

Practical Implementation and Workflow

Data Requirements

To generate a volcano plot, your dataset must contain at minimum [5]:

• Feature identifiers (e.g., Gene IDs)
• Raw or adjusted p-values
• Fold change values (preferably already in log2 scale)

Example R Implementation Using EnhancedVolcano

The following code demonstrates how to create a publication-ready volcano plot in R using the EnhancedVolcano package, which offers extensive customization options [6]:

Advanced Customization

EnhancedVolcano provides numerous configuration options to enhance plot clarity and information content [6]:

• Visual encoding: Modify point shapes by significance category and adjust colors to highlight different types of features.
• Label optimization: Use connectors to link labels to points, maximizing space utilization and reducing clutter.
• Threshold lines: Customize the appearance of cut-off lines or add multiple threshold lines for different significance levels.
• Legend customization: Reposition the legend, modify text, or hide it entirely for a cleaner appearance.

Research Reagent Solutions for Volcano Plot Analysis

Creating a volcano plot requires both statistical software tools and specialized data analysis packages. The table below details essential "research reagents" for generating and interpreting volcano plots in omics studies:

Tool/Package	Function	Application Context
EnhancedVolcano (R) [6]	Generates highly-customizable, publication-ready volcano plots with advanced labeling	Bioinformatics, genomics, transcriptomics
ggplot2 (R) [7]	Creates volcano plots using a layered grammar of graphics; highly flexible	General statistics, bioinformatics, data science
DESeq2 (R) [6]	Performs differential expression analysis; generates results for plotting	RNA-seq data analysis, transcriptomics
limma-voom (R) [2]	Differential expression for microarray and RNA-seq data	Microarray analysis, RNA-seq data analysis
GraphBio [5]	Web-based tool for creating volcano plots without programming	User-friendly omics data visualization
Partek Flow [3]	Commercial software with point-and-click volcano plot visualization	Bioinformatics, pharmaceutical research

Biological Applications and Interpretation

Volcano plots serve as a critical visualization tool across multiple domains of omics research:

• Transcriptomics: Identification of differentially expressed genes in RNA-seq experiments, such as identifying genes involved in luminal pregnant versus lactating comparisons in mammary gland studies [2].
• Proteomics: Discovery of significantly altered protein expression between experimental conditions.
• Metabolomics: Detection of meaningful changes in metabolite concentrations [1].
• Genetic Association Studies: Visualization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), where the x-axis may represent log odds ratios instead of fold change [1].

When interpreting volcano plots, researchers should consider both statistical and biological context. For example, in a study comparing luminal cells from pregnant versus lactating mice, the gene Csn1s2b—a calcium-sensitive casein important in milk production—was identified as the most statistically significant gene with a large fold change, which aligns with the biological context of the experiment [2].

Volcano plots provide an indispensable visualization framework for high-dimensional biological data analysis, effectively balancing statistical rigor with intuitive interpretation. By simultaneously representing the magnitude (fold change) and significance (p-value) of measured changes, they enable rapid identification of the most promising candidates for further investigation. Mastery of volcano plot interpretation—including understanding its axes, thresholds, and biological context—is an essential skill for researchers engaged in omics data analysis and biomarker discovery. As omics technologies continue to evolve, the volcano plot remains a fundamental tool for translating complex statistical results into biologically meaningful insights.

The volcano plot stands as a cornerstone of biological data visualization in omics research, providing an intuitive yet powerful framework for identifying statistically significant and biologically relevant changes within massive datasets. This technical guide deconstructs the central visual metaphor of the "cone" and "sides" that gives this visualization its name and analytical power. By examining the mathematical foundations, interpretation methodologies, and practical implementation pathways, we provide researchers with a comprehensive framework for leveraging volcano plots to accelerate biomarker discovery, pathway analysis, and therapeutic target identification in drug development pipelines. Our systematic approach bridges the gap between statistical abstraction and biological meaning, enabling more effective prioritization of candidates for further validation.

In the era of high-throughput biology, researchers routinely generate datasets containing thousands to millions of measurements comparing conditions, such as healthy versus diseased tissue or treated versus untreated cell lines. The primary analytical challenge lies in distinguishing meaningful biological signals from random noise and multiple testing artifacts. Volcano plots address this challenge by providing a compact visualization that simultaneously displays both the magnitude of change (effect size) and statistical evidence for each measured feature in a differential analysis [8]. The name "volcano plot" derives from its characteristic shape, which often resembles a volcanic cone with upward-extending sides, where the most biologically interesting features appear as points high on the sides of this cone [1].

The fundamental strength of the volcano plot lies in its ability to visualize the relationship between two key dimensions of evidence for each feature (e.g., gene, protein, or metabolite). The x-axis represents the logarithm of the fold change between conditions, indicating the magnitude and direction of abundance differences. The y-axis plots the negative logarithm of the p-value (or adjusted p-value), transforming the statistical significance metric so that more significant features appear higher on the plot [8] [2]. This dual-axis approach allows researchers to quickly identify features that exhibit both large effect sizes and strong statistical support – these form the "sides" of the volcanic cone and represent the most promising candidates for further investigation.

Within the context of omics data visualization research, volcano plots serve as a critical triage tool, enabling researchers to efficiently navigate complex results from transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic experiments. The visual metaphor of the cone and sides provides an intuitive mental model for balancing two competing priorities in biomarker discovery: the desire for large effect sizes that may indicate biological importance, and the need for statistical rigor to control false discoveries. By mastering this visualization, researchers can more effectively generate hypotheses about underlying biological mechanisms and select targets for downstream validation experiments.

Deconstructing the Visual Metaphor: Cone and Sides

Anatomical Components of the Volcano Plot

The volcano plot's visual metaphor emerges from the interaction between its two primary axes and the distribution of data points across this bivariate space. The "cone" formation results from the mathematical relationship between fold change and statistical significance in typical omics datasets, while the "sides" represent the regions where biologically significant features concentrate.

The Base Cone Formation: The conical shape manifests through the highest density of data points near the center bottom of the plot, with points becoming progressively sparser toward the upper corners. This distribution pattern arises from fundamental statistical principles: most features in omics experiments exhibit minimal change between conditions (cluster near log₂FC = 0) with modest statistical significance (low -log₁₀(p-value)), forming the base of the cone. As we move vertically upward, we encounter features with increasingly stronger statistical evidence, while movement horizontally toward either side reveals features with larger effect sizes [1]. The parabolic upper boundary occurs because the -log₁₀(p-value) is approximately proportional to the square of the log₂(fold change) under the null hypothesis, creating the characteristic cone shape.

The Significant Sides: The "sides" of the volcano represent the critical regions where features with both substantial effect sizes and statistical significance reside. These areas are typically defined by applying dual thresholds – both a minimum fold change and a maximum p-value (or FDR) cutoff. The right side contains upregulated features (positive log₂FC values), while the left side contains downregulated features (negative log₂FC values) [8]. From a biological perspective, these sides contain the most promising candidates for further investigation, as they have passed both effect size and statistical significance hurdles.

Table 1: Interpretation of Volcano Plot Regions

Region	Position	Fold Change	Statistical Significance	Biological Interpretation
Upper-Right Side	Right, High	log₂FC > 0, exceeds cutoff	-log₁₀(p) high, exceeds cutoff	Strongly upregulated features with statistical support
Upper-Left Side	Left, High	log₂FC < 0, exceeds cutoff	-log₁₀(p) high, exceeds cutoff	Strongly downregulated features with statistical support
Base/Center	Center, Low	log₂FC ≈ 0, below cutoff	-log₁₀(p) low, below cutoff	Unchanged features with minimal biological relevance
Lower-Sides	Sides, Low	log₂FC exceeds cutoff	-log₁₀(p) low, below cutoff	Features with large effect sizes but poor statistical support
Upper-Center	Center, High	log₂FC ≈ 0, below cutoff	-log₁₀(p) high, exceeds cutoff	Statistically significant features with minimal fold change

Mathematical Foundations

The volcano plot's construction relies on two key transformations of raw data that enable effective visualization of the relationship between effect size and statistical evidence:

Fold Change Transformation: The fold change (FC) represents the ratio of abundance between two conditions for each feature. By applying a base-2 logarithm (logâ‚‚FC), we achieve several important properties: (1) symmetry around zero (no change), where logâ‚‚FC = 0; (2) equal visual weighting of upregulation (positive values) and downregulation (negative values); and (3) conversion of multiplicative relationships into additive ones, which better aligns with many statistical models [8]. A logâ‚‚FC of 1 corresponds to a 2-fold increase, while -1 represents a 2-fold decrease.

Statistical Significance Transformation: The p-value from hypothesis testing undergoes a negative base-10 logarithm transformation (-log₁₀(p-value)). This transformation amplifies differences between very small p-values, making visually apparent the distinction between, for example, p = 0.01 (-log₁₀ = 2) and p = 0.0001 (-log₁₀ = 4). More importantly, it inverts the scale so that more statistically significant values appear higher on the y-axis, intuitively positioning "better" results at the top of the plot [2].

The cone shape emerges mathematically from the relationship between these two transformed variables. For a two-group comparison with normally distributed data, the test statistic (and thus the p-value) for a difference in means is related to the square of the effect size. Since -log₁₀(p-value) is approximately proportional to the test statistic for small p-values, and the test statistic is proportional to the square of the log₂FC, we find that -log₁₀(p-value) ∝ (log₂FC)², which is the equation for a parabola – the cross-section of the volcanic cone [1].

Quantitative Thresholds for Biological Significance

Establishing Significance Cutoffs

The interpretation of volcano plots relies on establishing appropriate thresholds to define biological and statistical significance. These thresholds create the boundaries that separate the meaningful "sides" from the uninteresting base of the cone. While specific thresholds should be determined based on experimental context, certain conventions have emerged in omics research.

Effect Size Thresholds: The fold change threshold establishes the minimum magnitude of change considered biologically meaningful. In many omics studies, a |log₂FC| ≥ 1 (equivalent to a 2-fold change) serves as a common starting point [8]. This threshold may be adjusted based on biological context; for example, in systems with high natural variability, a more stringent threshold (e.g., |log₂FC| ≥ 2) might be appropriate, while in tightly controlled model systems, a less stringent threshold might be justified.

Statistical Significance Thresholds: The statistical significance threshold controls the false discovery rate in multiple testing scenarios. The use of q-values (FDR-adjusted p-values) is generally preferred over raw p-values, as it accounts for the thousands of simultaneous tests performed in omics experiments [8]. A common threshold is q < 0.05, indicating a 5% false discovery rate. This corresponds to a -log₁₀(q-value) of 1.3, though researchers often set more stringent thresholds (e.g., q < 0.01, -log₁₀(q) = 2) to identify higher-confidence candidates.

Table 2: Common Threshold Combinations in Omics Research

Application Domain	Typical	log₂FC	Threshold	Typical FDR Threshold	Corresponding -log₁₀(FDR)	Rationale
Transcriptomics (RNA-seq)	0.58–1 (1.5–2 fold)	0.01–0.05	2–1.3	Balance between detection sensitivity and specificity
Proteomics	0.5–1 (1.4–2 fold)	0.01–0.05	2–1.3	Accounts for higher technical variability in protein measurement
Metabolomics	0.8–1.3 (1.75–2.5 fold)	0.05–0.1	1.3–1	Accommodates diverse dynamic ranges of metabolites
Phosphoproteomics	0.8–1 (1.75–2 fold)	0.01–0.05	2–1.3	Targets specific signaling changes with potentially subtle effects
Biomarker Discovery	1–1.5 (2–2.8 fold)	0.001–0.01	3–2	Stringent criteria for candidate verification

Threshold Optimization Strategies

Selecting appropriate thresholds requires balancing sensitivity (ability to detect true positives) and specificity (avoidance of false positives). Researchers should consider several factors when establishing thresholds:

Biological Context: The expected effect sizes should inform the log₂FC threshold. For example, interventions targeting master regulators (e.g., transcription factors) might produce larger effect sizes than those affecting downstream effectors. Similarly, the biological variability of the system should influence statistical thresholds – systems with higher inherent variability may require more stringent statistical cutoffs.

Technical Considerations: Analytical variability, measurement precision, and sample preparation consistency can all impact both effect size estimates and statistical significance. Platforms with higher technical noise may necessitate larger fold change thresholds to ensure biological relevance.

Downstream Applications: The intended use of the results should guide threshold selection. For exploratory studies generating hypotheses, more lenient thresholds might be appropriate to capture a broader range of candidates. For targeted validation experiments or biomarker panels, more stringent thresholds help prioritize the most promising candidates for resource-intensive follow-up studies.

Practical Implementation and Workflow

Data Preparation and Preprocessing

The generation of biologically meaningful volcano plots requires careful data preprocessing to ensure that the visualized effects represent true biological signals rather than technical artifacts. The following workflow outlines critical steps preceding volcano plot generation:

Critical Preprocessing Steps:

• Quality Control and Normalization: Assess data quality through metrics such as sample clustering, principal component analysis, and distribution examination. Apply appropriate normalization methods to remove technical biases while preserving biological signals [8]. Common approaches include quantile normalization (for transcriptomics) and median normalization (for proteomics).

• Batch Effect Correction: Identify and correct for batch effects using methods such as ComBat or remove unwanted variation (RUV) approaches. Batch effects can artificially inflate both fold changes and significance estimates, potentially creating false "sides" on the volcano plot [8].

• Missing Value Imputation: Develop a strategy for handling missing values that accounts for the likely mechanism behind the missingness. Common approaches include minimum imputation, k-nearest neighbors imputation, or more sophisticated model-based methods. Documentation of imputation methods is essential, as aggressive imputation can bias logâ‚‚FC estimates [8].

Visualization Tools and Implementation

Several computational tools enable the generation of publication-ready volcano plots. The following implementation examples cover common analysis environments:

R Implementation with EnhancedVolcano: The EnhancedVolcano package (available through Bioconductor) provides highly customizable volcano plot generation with advanced labeling options [6].

Advanced Customization in R: EnhancedVolcano supports extensive customization to enhance biological interpretation:

Galaxy Platform Implementation: For researchers preferring point-and-click interfaces, the Galaxy platform provides accessible volcano plot generation [2]:

• Input Preparation: Format differential expression results with required columns: raw p-values, adjusted p-values (FDR), log fold change, and gene labels.

• Tool Configuration: Use the Volcano Plot tool in Galaxy with these parameters:

  • FDR (adjusted P value): Select appropriate column
  • P value (raw): Select appropriate column
  • Log Fold Change: Select appropriate column
  • Labels: Select appropriate column
  • Significance threshold: 0.01
  • LogFC threshold to colour: 0.58 (for 1.5-fold change)

• Customization Options: Adjust labeling to highlight top significant genes or predefined genes of interest, add label boxes for emphasis, and modify visual attributes for publication readiness [2].

Experimental Protocols for Case Studies

Proteomics Application: Kinase Inhibitor Profiling

Experimental Design: This protocol outlines a representative phosphoproteomics case study investigating kinase inhibitor effects in cancer cell lines, demonstrating how volcano plots reveal mechanism of action and compensatory signaling pathways.

Methodology:

• Cell Culture and Treatment: Culture appropriate cancer cell lines in triplicate for each condition (treatment vs. DMSO control). Treat with kinase inhibitor at predetermined ICâ‚…â‚€ concentration for 4 hours to capture direct phosphorylation effects.

• Sample Preparation:

  • Lyse cells using urea-based lysis buffer with phosphatase and protease inhibitors
  • Reduce with dithiothreitol, alkylate with iodoacetamide
  • Digest with trypsin overnight at 37°C
  • Desalt peptides using C₁₈ solid-phase extraction

• Phosphopeptide Enrichment:

  • Enrich phosphopeptides using TiOâ‚‚ or IMAC magnetic beads
  • Wash with loading buffer (80% ACN/5% TFA)
  • Elute with ammonia solution
  • Acidify and dry for LC-MS/MS analysis

• LC-MS/MS Analysis:

  • Resuspend peptides in 0.1% formic acid
  • Separate using nanoflow LC system (C₁₈ column, 90-minute gradient)
  • Analyze with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometer (Data-Dependent Acquisition mode)
  • Use stepped collision energy for improved fragmentation

• Data Processing:

  • Identify and quantify phosphopeptides using search engines (MaxQuant, Spectronaut)
  • Normalize using median normalization
  • Perform differential abundance analysis using linear models with empirical Bayes moderation

• Volcano Plot Interpretation:

  • Apply thresholds: |logâ‚‚FC| ≥ 1 and FDR < 0.05
  • Identify significantly altered phosphosites in upper-right (inhibitor-sensitive targets) and upper-left (potentially compensatory increased phosphorylation)
  • Annotate sentinel phosphoproteins with known roles in targeted pathways
  • Perform pathway enrichment on significant phosphoproteins

Expected Outcomes: The volcano plot typically reveals ~30 significantly altered phosphoproteins clustering in the right arm, indicating direct inhibitor targets. These often enrich in MAPK signaling pathways. The left arm may show compensatory phosphorylation changes suggesting adaptive resistance mechanisms, frequently enriching in PI3K-AKT signaling [8]. Sentinel targets (most significantly altered) become priorities for validation experiments.

Metabolomics Application: Disease Biomarker Discovery

Experimental Design: This protocol describes a plasma metabolomics case study comparing diseased versus healthy cohorts, illustrating how volcano plots identify potential diagnostic biomarkers and perturbed metabolic pathways.

Methodology:

• Sample Collection:
  • Collect fasting plasma from well-matched diseased and healthy control cohorts (minimum n=20 per group)
  • Process within 30 minutes of collection (centrifugation, aliquoting, freezing at -80°C)
  • Maintain consistent collection tubes and processing protocols across all samples

• Metabolite Extraction:

  • Thaw samples on ice
  • Precipitate proteins with cold methanol (3:1 methanol:plasma ratio)
  • Vortex, incubate at -20°C for 1 hour, centrifuge
  • Transfer supernatant to new tubes, dry under nitrogen
  • Reconstitute in appropriate solvent for analytical platform

• Untargeted LC-MS Analysis:

  • Analyze in both positive and negative ionization modes
  • Use reversed-phase chromatography for lipid-soluble metabolites
  • Use HILIC chromatography for water-soluble metabolites
  • Include quality control pools (all samples combined) analyzed throughout sequence
  • Use high-resolution mass spectrometer in full-scan mode with data-dependent MS/MS

• Data Processing:

  • Extract features using XCMS, MS-DIAL, or similar software
  • Perform retention time alignment, peak integration, and gap filling
  • Annotate metabolites using accurate mass, MS/MS fragmentation, and standards when available
  • Normalize using probabilistic quotient normalization or quality control-based approaches

• Statistical Analysis:

  • Perform log transformation and Pareto scaling
  • Use linear models with appropriate covariates (age, gender, batch)
  • Apply FDR correction for multiple testing

• Volcano Plot Interpretation:

  • Apply thresholds: |logâ‚‚FC| ≥ 1 and FDR < 0.05
  • Identify left-arm cluster of decreased metabolites (potential depletion in disease)
  • Identify right-arm cluster of increased metabolites (potential accumulation in disease)
  • Annotate key metabolite classes showing coordinated changes (e.g., bile acids, acylcarnitines)
  • Evaluate multi-metabolite panels for classification performance using ROC analysis

Expected Outcomes: The volcano plot typically reveals distinct metabolite clusters, such as left-arm decreases in bile acid conjugates and right-arm increases in acylcarnitines. These patterns suggest specific pathway disruptions (e.g., β-oxidation impairment, bile acid metabolism alteration). A three-metabolite panel may achieve cross-validated AUC ≈ 0.87, requiring external validation in independent cohorts [8].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Volcano Plot Applications

Reagent/Material	Application Context	Function/Purpose	Example Products/Platforms
Cell Culture Reagents	In vitro models for perturbation studies	Provide biological system for intervention experiments	DMEM/RPMI media, fetal bovine serum, kinase inhibitors
Protein Extraction Buffers	Proteomics sample preparation	Efficiently lyse cells while maintaining protein integrity and post-translational modifications	Urea-based lysis buffer, RIPA buffer with protease/phosphatase inhibitors
Trypsin/Lys-C	Proteomics sample preparation	Specific proteolytic digestion for mass spectrometry analysis	Sequencing-grade modified trypsin
TiO₂ or IMAC Magnetic Beads	Phosphoproteomics enrichment	Selective binding of phosphopeptides from complex peptide mixtures	Titansphere TiO₂ beads, Fe³⁺-IMAC beads
C₁₈ Solid-Phase Extraction Cartridges	Sample cleanup	Desalting and concentration of peptides prior to LC-MS	Sep-Pak C₁₈ cartridges
LC-MS Grade Solvents	Chromatography separation	High-purity solvents for reproducible chromatographic performance	Acetonitrile, methanol, water with 0.1% formic acid
Mass Spectrometry Quality Control Standards	Instrument calibration and QC	Verify instrument performance and enable cross-laboratory comparisons	Pierce Retention Time Calibration Mix, iRT kits
Statistical Analysis Software	Data processing and visualization	Perform differential analysis and generate volcano plots	R/Bioconductor, Galaxy, Python SciPy
Pathway Analysis Databases	Biological interpretation	Contextualize significant findings within known biological pathways	KEGG, GO, Reactome, MetaboAnalyst
Calcium linoleate	Calcium Linoleate|CAS 19704-83-7|Research Chemical		Bench Chemicals
Denipride	Denipride | Dopamine D2/D3 Receptor Antagonist	Denipride is a selective dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist for neurological research. For Research Use Only. Not for human or veterinary use.	Bench Chemicals

Advanced Interpretation and Biological Validation

Contextualizing Volcano Plot Patterns

The spatial distribution of points within a volcano plot provides valuable insights into the biological system under investigation. Specific patterns often correspond to distinct biological phenomena:

Asymmetric Sides: Marked asymmetry between the left and right sides of the volcano plot frequently indicates directional biological responses. For example, predominant upregulation of inflammatory proteins in response to immune activation, or predominant downregulation of mitochondrial proteins in cellular stress models. These asymmetries can reveal the dominant direction of pathway regulation.

Multiple Clusters on Sides: The presence of distinct clusters within the significant sides often reflects coordinated regulation of functional modules. In transcriptomics, this might represent co-regulated gene sets under control of specific transcription factors. In metabolomics, clustered patterns may indicate related biochemical pathways responding to the experimental condition.

Horizontal Alignments: Features aligned horizontally at different heights may represent different statistical confidence levels for effects of similar magnitude. This pattern can emerge when analyzing heterogeneous samples where effect sizes are consistent but variability differs between feature classes.

From Visualization to Validation

The ultimate value of volcano plot analysis lies in its ability to prioritize candidates for downstream validation. A systematic approach to validation ensures efficient resource allocation:

Technical Validation: Confirm analytical measurements for top candidates using orthogonal methods. For proteomics, transition from discovery proteomics to targeted methods (SRM/PRM). For metabolomics, use targeted assays with authentic standards. For transcriptomics, employ qRT-PCR for candidate genes.

Biological Validation: Establish functional relevance through perturbation studies. For candidate biomarkers, assess performance in independent cohorts. For mechanistic candidates, use genetic (siRNA, CRISPR) or pharmacological interventions to establish causal relationships to phenotypes of interest.

Integration with Multi-Omics: Correlate significant findings across omics layers to strengthen biological interpretation. For example, concordant changes in transcripts and corresponding proteins provide stronger evidence for pathway activation than either measurement alone.

The volcano plot remains an indispensable tool for visualizing and interpreting high-dimensional biological data, effectively bridging statistical rigor and biological relevance. The visual metaphor of the cone and sides provides an intuitive framework for identifying features that demonstrate both substantial effect sizes and statistical significance – the hallmarks of biologically meaningful changes. By mastering the construction, interpretation, and application of volcano plots, researchers can more effectively navigate complex omics datasets, generate robust biological hypotheses, and prioritize candidates for validation. As omics technologies continue to evolve, producing increasingly complex datasets, the principles of effective data visualization embodied in the volcano plot will remain essential for extracting meaningful biological insights from statistical patterns.

Volcano plots are a cornerstone of biological data visualization, particularly in transcriptomics, providing an intuitive means to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that are both statistically significant and biologically relevant. This technical guide details the systematic interpretation of volcano plots within the broader context of omics data visualization research, offering researchers and drug development professionals a comprehensive framework for extracting meaningful insights from high-throughput experimental data. We present detailed methodologies, structured data presentation, and essential visualization tools to enhance analytical rigor in interpreting gene expression patterns, pathway perturbations, and potential therapeutic targets.

Volcano plots serve as a critical visualization tool in genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics studies, enabling researchers to simultaneously assess statistical significance and magnitude of change across thousands of genomic features. These plots derive their name from their characteristic shape, which often resembles a volcano with a wide base and tapered peak, formed when plotting statistical significance against magnitude of change across numerous data points. In the context of RNA-seq data analysis, a volcano plot is a type of scatterplot that displays statistical significance (P value) versus magnitude of change (fold change), enabling quick visual identification of genes with large fold changes that are also statistically significant [2]. These visually prominent features typically represent the most biologically significant genes in an experiment.

The fundamental value of volcano plots lies in their ability to condense multidimensional data into an intuitively understandable two-dimensional representation, facilitating hypothesis generation and experimental prioritization. Within drug development pipelines, these visualizations rapidly highlight potential drug targets, biomarkers, and pathway perturbations by distinguishing random variation from biologically meaningful expression changes. Their application extends across various omics disciplines, consistently providing the first visual checkpoint after differential expression analysis and guiding subsequent functional and pathway-based investigations.

Anatomical Components of a Volcano Plot

Axis Configuration and Interpretation

The volcano plot's coordinate system transforms raw statistical measures into visually interpretable dimensions:

• X-axis: Magnitude of Change: Represents the log2 fold change (log2FC) between experimental conditions. This logarithmic transformation linearizes multiplicative fold changes, centering unchanged expression at zero. Positive values indicate upregulated features in the experimental condition relative to control, while negative values represent downregulated features. For example, a log2FC of 1 corresponds to a 2-fold increase, while a log2FC of -2 corresponds to a 4-fold decrease [9].

• Y-axis: Statistical Significance: Typically displays -log10(p-value) or -log10(adjusted p-value). This negative logarithmic transformation inflates the visual prominence of highly significant features (small p-values) by positioning them higher on the axis. A p-value of 0.01 becomes -log10(0.01) = 2, while a more significant p-value of 0.001 becomes -log10(0.001) = 3 [2]. Using adjusted p-values (e.g., FDR) corrects for multiple testing, reducing false discovery rates.

Threshold Lines and Significance Boundaries

Threshold lines create meaningful partitions within the plot, defining biological and statistical significance cutoffs:

• Vertical Thresholds: Define minimum fold change magnitudes considered biologically relevant. These are typically symmetric around zero (e.g., ±log2FC of 0.58, equivalent to 1.5-fold change) [2]. The specific threshold should reflect biological context; larger thresholds identify stronger effects with potentially fewer hits.

• Horizontal Threshold: Establishes the statistical significance boundary, commonly set at -log10(0.05) = 1.3 for raw p-values or more stringent thresholds for adjusted p-values (e.g., FDR < 0.01) [2]. This line separates potentially meaningful changes from background noise.

The intersection of these thresholds divides the plot into four biologically informative quadrants, which will be explored in the interpretation section.

Visual Encodings for Feature Categorization

Color, shape, and size enhancements facilitate rapid feature categorization:

• Color Coding: Typically discriminates between upregulated (often red), downregulated (often blue), and non-significant features (often gray or black) [9]. This immediate visual classification enables rapid assessment of expression pattern directionality.

• Point Customization: Size and shape variations can encode additional dimensions, such as expression amplitude, functional category, or confidence metrics [10]. Strategic use of these encodings creates rich, multi-dimensional visualizations without complicating the core interpretation.

Table: Standard Visual Encodings in Volcano Plot Interpretation

Visual Element	Representation	Common Implementation
X-axis position	Magnitude of change (log2FC)	Zero-centered continuum
Y-axis position	Statistical significance (-log10p)	Zero-based positive scale
Point color	Expression direction	Red (up), blue (down), gray (non-sig)
Point size	Effect size or confidence	Proportional to log2FC or -log10p
Point shape	Functional category	Circles, triangles, squares for pathways
Labeling	Feature identity	Gene symbols for significant features

Step-by-Step Protocol for Plot Interpretation

Global Pattern Assessment

Begin with a holistic evaluation of the plot's distribution to gauge data quality and experimental effect size:

• Examine Point Distribution: Assess the overall scatter distribution. A healthy experiment typically shows a dense "cloud" of non-significant features near the base, with features radiating upward toward higher significance levels. The width of the distribution indicates effect size variability, while the height reflects statistical power.

• Identify Asymmetries: Note any imbalances between left (downregulated) and right (upregulated) sides of the plot. Pronounced asymmetry may indicate systematic biases or biologically meaningful directional responses. For example, an immunosuppressive treatment might produce predominantly downregulated immune genes.

• Evaluate Threshold Appropriateness: Assess whether the predefined significance thresholds appropriately capture features of interest. Overly stringent thresholds may obscure subtle but coordinated biological responses, while lenient thresholds increase false positives.

Feature Categorization and Prioritization

Systematically categorize features into biologically meaningful groups based on their coordinate positions:

• Identify Significantly Upregulated Features: Locate features in the upper-right quadrant (positive log2FC beyond threshold, -log10p beyond threshold). These represent genes with statistically significant increased expression in the experimental condition. In a COVID-19 severity study, these might include inflammatory mediators like cytokines and chemokines [9].

• Identify Significantly Downregulated Features: Locate features in the upper-left quadrant (negative log2FC beyond threshold, -log10p beyond threshold). These represent genes with statistically significant decreased expression. In cancer studies, these often include tumor suppressor genes or metabolic enzymes.

• Assess Statistical-Only Features: Note features with high statistical significance but minimal fold change (near vertical center, high on y-axis). These may represent highly precise measurements of subtle effects worth investigating for their biological consistency rather than individual impact.

• Identify Magnitude-Only Features: Recognize features with large fold changes but marginal statistical significance (far left or right, near horizontal threshold). These may represent potentially important but noisy signals requiring validation.

Feature Annotation and Biological Contextualization

Add meaningful annotations to bridge statistical findings with biological interpretation:

• Label Extreme Outliers: Identify and label features at the visual periphery—those with exceptionally large fold changes and/or extreme significance values. These often represent key response elements or experimental artifacts requiring verification.

• Annotate Known Biological Targets: Highlight features with established relevance to the experimental context, even if they don't represent the most extreme statistical values. This practice connects data-driven discovery with established biological knowledge.

• Implement Strategic Labeling: When labeling multiple features, use algorithms that prevent overlapping text (e.g., ggrepel in R) [9]. Prioritize labeling based on statistical significance, fold change magnitude, or known biological importance to maintain visualization clarity.

Table: Interpretation Guide for Volcano Plot Quadrants

Quadrant Position	Expression Category	Biological Interpretation	Validation Priority
Upper-right	Upregulated significant	Strongly activated genes; potential drug targets or disease drivers	High
Upper-left	Downregulated significant	Strongly suppressed genes; potential tumor suppressors or pathway inhibitors	High
Lower-right	Upregulated non-significant	Potentially important effects lacking statistical power; possible false negatives	Medium
Lower-left	Downregulated non-significant	Weakly suppressed genes; less likely to be biologically impactful	Low
Near y-axis above threshold	Significant, minimal fold change	Precise measurements of subtle effects; potentially important in aggregate	Variable
Far from y-axis below threshold	Large change, non-significant	Noisy potential signals; require replication	Low

Practical Application with Real Experimental Data

Case Study: Luminal Mammary Cell Differentiation

To illustrate practical volcano plot interpretation, we examine a published dataset comparing luminal pregnant versus lactating mice from Fu et al. 2015 [2]. The differential expression analysis identified hundreds of significant genes using thresholds of FDR < 0.01 and logFC threshold of 0.58 (equivalent to 1.5-fold change).

Key Interpretation Steps and Findings:

• Global Assessment: The plot shows extensive differential expression with numerous features above significance thresholds, indicating substantial transcriptomic reprogramming during the pregnancy-to-lactation transition.

• Directional Analysis: Both upregulated (right) and downregulated (left) features appear abundant, with possible slight asymmetry suggesting coordinated biological programs.

• Top Feature Identification: The most statistically significant gene with large fold change was Csn1s2b, a calcium-sensitive casein important in milk production [2]. This biologically plausible finding validates the experimental context.

• Targeted Annotation: When labeling genes of interest from the original publication (30 cytokines/growth factors plus Mcl1), 29 of 31 were significant, while Mcl1 showed no transcriptional change despite protein-level increases—suggesting post-transcriptional regulation [2].

Methodological Protocol: Volcano Plot Generation

For researchers recreating this analysis, the following workflow details the essential steps:

Required R Packages and Functions:

• ggplot2: Creates the foundational scatterplot and customizations
• ggrepel: Prevents overlapping gene labels through intelligent repulsion
• EnhancedVolcano: Specialized package for standardized volcano plots [10]
• DESeq2/edgeR: Typically generates the input differential expression results

Critical Parameters for Reproducibility:

• Fold Change Threshold: Biologically relevant magnitude (commonly 1.5-2x fold change)
• Statistical Threshold: P-value or adjusted p-value cutoff (FDR < 0.01 common in transcriptomics)
• Visual Parameters: Point transparency (alpha), colors, label selection criteria

Advanced Interpretation Strategies

Addressing Asymmetry and Technical Artifacts

Volcano plots frequently exhibit asymmetries that require careful biological versus technical discrimination:

• Biological Asymmetry: Genuine predisposition toward up- or down-regulation occurs in many biological processes. For example, oncogenic transformations often show predominant upregulation of growth-promoting genes and downregulation of differentiation genes.

• Technical Asymmetry: Platform-specific biases or normalization artifacts can create artificial asymmetries. GC-content bias in RNA-seq or background fluorescence in microarrays may require specific correction approaches before biological interpretation.

• Compositional Effects: In experiments comparing fundamentally different cell populations, apparent expression changes may reflect population composition shifts rather than genuine regulation. Cell sorting or single-cell approaches can resolve these ambiguities.

Functional Analysis Integration

Volcano plots serve as gateways to functional interpretation through integrated pathway analysis:

• Separate Enrichment Analysis: Evidence indicates that analyzing up- and downregulated genes separately identifies more biologically pertinent pathways than analyzing all DEGs together [11]. This approach respects the biological coherence of coordinated regulation direction.

• Pathway Imbalance Assessment: Functionally linked genes in pathways tend toward positively correlated expression, creating natural imbalances between up- and downregulated genes in particular pathways [11]. Recognizing these patterns strengthens biological interpretation.

• Temporal Dynamics: In time-series experiments, generating multiple volcano plots across time points reveals evolving biological responses, distinguishing immediate-early responses from delayed secondary effects.

Multi-Omic Correlation Strategies

Advanced applications correlate volcano plot findings with complementary omics datasets:

• Proteomic Integration: Compare transcriptomic changes with proteomic measurements to identify post-transcriptional regulation. The Mcl1 example from the case study exemplifies this approach [2].

• Epigenomic Context: Integrate with chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq) or histone modification (ChIP-seq) data to distinguish primary transcriptional regulation from secondary effects.

• Pharmacogenomic Applications: In drug development, overlay volcano plots from compound treatment with chemical-genetic interaction networks to identify mechanism-of-action and resistance pathways.

Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools

Table: Research Reagent Solutions for Volcano Plot Applications

Tool/Category	Specific Examples	Function in Analysis	Implementation Considerations
Differential Analysis Packages	DESeq2, edgeR, limma-voom	Generate input statistics from raw counts	DESeq2 for RNA-seq; limma for microarrays
Visualization Packages	ggplot2, EnhancedVolcano, Galaxy Volcano	Create and customize volcano plots	EnhancedVolcano for standardized outputs
Gene Annotation Resources	org.Hs.eg.db, AnnotationDbi	Convert gene identifiers	Critical for functional analysis
Functional Analysis Tools	clusterProfiler, DAVID, GOseq	Pathway enrichment of significant genes	clusterProfiler for integrated R workflow
Label Management	ggrepel	Prevent overlapping gene labels	Essential for publication figures
Data Repository	GEO, TCGA, Zenodo	Source example datasets	Practice with public data first

Methodological Considerations for Robust Interpretation

Threshold Selection Strategies

Appropriate threshold selection balances biological relevance with statistical rigor:

• Biological Significance Cutoffs: Fold change thresholds should reflect biologically meaningful effect sizes specific to the experimental context. While 1.5-2x fold change suffices for many transcriptomic studies, proteomic studies often employ less stringent thresholds due to higher technical variability.

• Statistical Significance Adjustments: Multiple testing correction is essential for genome-scale analyses. False Discovery Rate (FDR) control maintains balance between discovery and false positives. The specific threshold (0.05, 0.01, 0.001) should reflect experimental goals—exploratory studies may tolerate higher FDRs than confirmatory analyses.

• Dynamic Thresholding: For well-characterized systems, implement tiered thresholds where known functional categories of interest receive less stringent criteria than novel findings, incorporating prior knowledge into discovery statistics.

Validation and Experimental Design Considerations

Robust volcano plot interpretation requires appropriate experimental design and validation planning:

• Biological Replication: Ensure sufficient sample sizes to detect biologically relevant effects with adequate power. Underpowered experiments produce volatile volcano plots with poor reproducibility.

• Technical Validation: Plan independent validation (qPCR, Western blot, immunohistochemistry) for top candidates, prioritizing based on statistical significance, magnitude, and biological plausibility.

• Cross-Platform Verification: When possible, verify key findings using alternative platforms (e.g., RNA-seq to microarray or Nanostring) to exclude platform-specific artifacts.

Volcano plots represent an essential visualization technique in modern omics research, transforming complex differential expression results into intuitively accessible representations. Through systematic interpretation following the guidelines presented herein, researchers can reliably identify upregulated, downregulated, and statistically significant features worthy of further investigation. The integration of these findings with functional analyses and orthogonal validation creates a powerful discovery pipeline that advances biological understanding and therapeutic development.

As omics technologies evolve toward single-cell resolution, multi-omic integration, and temporal dynamics, volcano plot methodologies will similarly advance, maintaining their position as indispensable tools for high-dimensional biological data interpretation. The fundamental principles outlined in this guide provide a foundation for both current applications and future methodological innovations in quantitative biology.

In the analysis of high-dimensional omics data, volcano plots have emerged as an indispensable tool for visualizing differential expression patterns. These plots provide a compact visualization of the relationship between the magnitude of change (fold change) and statistical evidence (p-values) across thousands of features simultaneously [8]. The interpretive power of volcano plots, however, hinges critically on the appropriate establishment of thresholds for both fold change and statistical significance. Without rigorously defined cut-offs, biological interpretation becomes subjective and irreproducible, potentially leading to flawed scientific conclusions and costly misdirection in drug development pipelines.

Within the framework of a broader thesis on guiding omics data visualization, this technical whitepaper addresses the pivotal role of threshold determination. We explore the statistical foundations, practical implementation strategies, and consequential impacts of cut-off selection on biological interpretation. For researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, mastering these principles is not merely academic—it represents the foundation upon which reliable, actionable scientific insights are built in an era of increasingly complex multivariate biological datasets.

Foundational Concepts: Fold Change and Statistical Significance

Fold Change (FC) and Logâ‚‚ Transformation

At its core, fold change represents the ratio of expression values between two experimental conditions (e.g., treated vs. control). The calculation is mathematically straightforward but biologically profound. For a given feature, if expression in the test condition is labeled Test and expression in the control condition is labeled Control, then:

Raw fold change values, however, produce an asymmetrical distribution where doubling (FC = 2) and halving (FC = 0.5) are not equidistant from "no change" (FC = 1). This asymmetry is resolved through logarithmic transformation, specifically using base 2, which centers the data around zero [12]. The transformation is calculated as:

This transformation yields intuitive interpretations: a Logâ‚‚FC of 1 indicates a doubling of expression, a Logâ‚‚FC of -1 indicates halving of expression, and values near zero indicate negligible change [12]. The logarithmic scale also provides the practical benefit of mitigating the influence of extreme outliers that could otherwise dominate visualizations.

P-values and Multiple Testing Correction

The p-value represents the probability of observing the obtained data (or more extreme data) if the null hypothesis of no differential expression were true. In omics experiments, where thousands of hypotheses are tested simultaneously, multiple testing correction becomes paramount to control false discoveries [8].

The most common correction is the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, which controls the False Discovery Rate (FDR) [8]. The FDR represents the expected proportion of false positives among all features declared significant. The output of this procedure is the q-value, which is the FDR analogue of the p-value. For the y-axis of volcano plots, both raw p-values and adjusted q-values are used, transformed as -log₁₀(p-value) or -log₁₀(q-value) [8]. This transformation causes highly significant features to appear higher on the plot, with the resulting values often referred to as "statistical significance" or "evidence" metrics.

Establishing Biological and Statistical Cut-offs

Threshold Selection Criteria

The establishment of appropriate thresholds for significance and fold change requires consideration of both statistical principles and biological context. There is no universal standard, but common practices have emerged across different omics disciplines.

Table 1: Common Threshold Values in Omics Studies

Omics Field	Fold Change Threshold	Significance Threshold	Rationale
Transcriptomics	|Log₂FC| ≥ 1 [12] [8]	q-value < 0.05 [8]	Balance between biological relevance and statistical stringency
Proteomics	|Log₂FC| ≥ 0.585 [8]	q-value < 0.05 [8]	Smaller effects often biologically relevant in protein networks
Metabolomics	|Log₂FC| ≥ 1 [8]	q-value < 0.05 [8]	Large changes often expected in metabolic reprogramming
Exploratory Studies	|Log₂FC| ≥ 0.5	p-value < 0.01	Less stringent to capture more potential targets
Validation Studies	|Log₂FC| ≥ 1.5	q-value < 0.01	More stringent to prioritize high-confidence candidates

Several factors influence the selection of appropriate thresholds:

• Biological effect size: The expected magnitude of biologically relevant changes in the specific system under study [13]
• Technical variability: The inherent noise in the measurement technology, where noisier systems may require larger fold change thresholds
• Sample size: Studies with larger sample sizes can detect smaller effects with confidence, potentially allowing for more modest fold change thresholds [8]
• Downstream validation capacity: The number of targets that can reasonably be validated through orthogonal methods
• Multiple testing burden: Studies with more features typically require more stringent significance thresholds to control false discoveries

The Interplay Between Statistical and Biological Significance

A fundamental challenge in omics data analysis is distinguishing between statistical significance and biological relevance. A feature may demonstrate strong statistical evidence (very small p-value) yet represent a trivial biological effect (minimal fold change). Conversely, a feature with substantial fold change might lack statistical support due to high variability or limited sample size [13] [8].

The volcano plot visually reconciles these dimensions by positioning features according to both criteria simultaneously. This visualization powerfully demonstrates why neither metric alone suffices for reliable inference. As demonstrated in a reanalysis of zebrafish microarray data, changing significance levels and fold change cut-offs yielded dramatically different biological interpretations of the hypoxia response, with important signaling pathways appearing or disappearing based solely on threshold selection [13].

Diagram 1: Threshold determination workflow for volcano plots

Practical Implementation and Methodologies

Data Preprocessing Requirements

Before threshold application, rigorous data preprocessing is essential to ensure the validity of both fold change and significance calculations. The quality control checklist should include:

• Normalization: Addressing systematic technical variation across samples using platform-appropriate methods (e.g., quantile normalization for microarrays, TMM for RNA-seq) [8]
• Batch effect correction: Identifying and adjusting for non-biological groupings using methods such as ComBat or surrogate variable analysis [8]
• Missing value imputation: Applying thoughtful strategies for handling missing data that account for the likely mechanism behind the missingness [8]
• Quality assessment: Verifying sample quality through principal component analysis and other diagnostic plots to identify outliers

These preprocessing steps directly impact threshold effectiveness. Inadequately corrected data can produce artificially inflated or deflated significance values and compress or expand fold change distributions, leading to inappropriate threshold application.

Step-by-Step Threshold Application Protocol

The following experimental protocol provides a reproducible methodology for threshold determination and application:

• Pre-register analysis plan: Document intended thresholds, normalization methods, and statistical models before conducting analysis to prevent threshold hacking [8]

• Calculate foundational metrics:

  • Compute Logâ‚‚FC for all features using normalized intensity values [12]
  • Perform appropriate statistical testing (e.g., t-tests, linear models) to generate p-values
  • Apply multiple testing correction to calculate q-values [8]

• Generate initial visualization: Create a volcano plot with Logâ‚‚FC on the x-axis and -log₁₀(q-value) on the y-axis [12] [8]

• Apply pre-determined thresholds: Filter features based on established cut-offs for both fold change and significance

• Conduct sensitivity analysis: Assess the robustness of findings by evaluating how selected features change with modest threshold adjustments

• Annotate and interpret: Label key features in the upper-left (significantly downregulated) and upper-right (significantly upregulated) regions for biological interpretation [8]

Diagram 2: Experimental protocol for threshold application

Research Reagent Solutions for Omics Experiments

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Volcano Plot Applications

Reagent/Material	Function in Omics Workflow	Application Context
RNA Extraction Kits (e.g., column-based)	Isolate high-quality RNA from biological samples	Transcriptomics studies requiring intact RNA for microarray or RNA-seq
Protein Lysis Buffers	Extract proteins while maintaining integrity	Proteomic analyses for mass spectrometry preparation
Metabolic Quenching Solutions	Rapidly halt metabolic activity	Metabolomics studies to preserve in vivo metabolic states
cDNA Synthesis Kits	Convert RNA to complementary DNA (cDNA)	Microarray and RNA-seq library preparation
Multiplex Assay Kits	Simultaneously measure multiple analytes	Targeted validation of candidates identified through volcano plot analysis
Normalization Standards	Account for technical variation across samples	All omics applications to improve data quality and comparability
Quality Control Biomarkers	Assess sample quality and processing efficiency	Pre-analytical phase to identify potential outliers or technical artifacts

Consequences of Threshold Selection

Impact on Biological Interpretation

Threshold selection directly dictates which features undergo further biological interpretation, with profound implications for the resulting scientific conclusions. In the reanalysis of zebrafish heart tissue response to hypoxia, different threshold combinations highlighted distinct biological processes [13]. At more stringent thresholds (p ≤ 0.02 and ≥2-fold change), hypoxia-inducible factor 1 was prominently identified, while at more lenient thresholds (p ≤ 0.05 and ≥1.5-fold change), chemokine CXCL12 emerged—a factor involved in angiogenesis with potential relevance to tumor biology that would have been overlooked with stricter cut-offs [13].

This threshold sensitivity underscores why predetermined, biologically informed criteria are essential rather than post hoc adjustments to capture "interesting" targets. The practice of "threshold hacking"—modifying cut-offs after data inspection to include or exclude specific features—irreparably compromises statistical integrity and reproducibility [8].

Addressing Common Pitfalls

Several recurrent challenges emerge in threshold application:

• Small sample sizes: With limited replicates, variance estimates become unstable and significance measures fluctuate dramatically [8]. In these scenarios, more conservative fold change thresholds and moderated statistical approaches are recommended.
• Imbalanced group designs: Unequal sample sizes between conditions can distort both fold change and significance calculations, requiring specialized statistical approaches [8]
• Inadequate power: Underpowered experiments may fail to detect biologically important effects regardless of threshold selection, highlighting the importance of prospective power calculations
• Platform-specific artifacts: Different measurement technologies (microarrays, RNA-seq, mass spectrometry) have distinct noise characteristics that should inform threshold selection

The establishment of appropriate thresholds for fold change and statistical significance represents both a statistical and biological decision that profoundly influences omics data interpretation. Through deliberate threshold selection, researchers can balance sensitivity against specificity, biological relevance against statistical evidence, and discovery against false positives. The following key recommendations emerge from current practice:

• Pre-register threshold values before data analysis to prevent selective reporting and threshold manipulation [8]
• Prioritize q-values over p-values to account for multiple testing and control the false discovery rate in high-dimensional data [8]
• Consider biological context when setting fold change thresholds, as the magnitude of biologically important effects varies across experimental systems and omics modalities [13]
• Conduct sensitivity analyses to evaluate how threshold adjustments affect the resulting feature list and biological interpretation [13]
• Document threshold justification thoroughly in publications and reports to enable evaluation and replication

When implemented consistently, thoughtfully established thresholds transform volcano plots from mere visualizations into powerful hypothesis-generating tools that reliably bridge statistical analysis and biological insight in omics research.

Creating Effective Volcano Plots: Tools, Techniques, and Advanced Applications

Volcano plots are indispensable in omics research for visualizing differential expression data, effectively illustrating the relationship between the magnitude of change (fold change) and statistical significance (p-value) [14]. This whitepaper provides a technical overview and comparison of the primary platforms available for generating these critical visualizations: R programming environment with its specialized packages, the web-based Galaxy platform, and integrated commercial bioinformatics suites. Aimed at researchers and drug development professionals, this guide details the capabilities, customization options, and optimal use cases for each tool within the context of a comprehensive omics data analysis workflow.

A volcano plot is a type of scatterplot that displays the results of a statistical test for hundreds or thousands of data points simultaneously—typically genes, proteins, or metabolites. Its name derives from the characteristic "volcano-like" shape formed when plotting statistical significance against the magnitude of change [14]. In a standard volcano plot, the x-axis represents the log2 fold change (log2FC), which indicates the magnitude of difference between two conditions (e.g., treated vs. control). The y-axis represents the -log10 of the p-value, transforming smaller, more significant p-values into larger positive numbers [2] [7]. This transformation means that the most biologically interesting features—those with large fold changes and high statistical significance—appear in the upper-left (significantly downregulated) and upper-right (significantly upregulated) sections of the plot [15]. This visual format enables the quick identification of key biomarkers and patterns, making it a fundamental tool in transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics studies [16] [14].

Platform Comparison

The choice of platform for generating volcano plots depends on several factors, including the user's programming proficiency, the need for customization, and the scale of the analysis. The table below summarizes the core characteristics of the three main platforms.

Table 1: Core Platform Comparison for Volcano Plot Generation

Platform	Primary Interface	Ideal User	Key Strength	Customization Level
R (e.g., EnhancedVolcano)	Code-based (RStudio)	Bioinformaticians, Data Scientists	High flexibility, publication-quality output, integration with analysis pipelines [15] [6]	Very High
Galaxy	Web-based, graphical	Bench Scientists, Beginners	User-friendly, no coding required, reproducible workflows [2] [17]	Medium
Commercial Platforms (e.g., Metabolon)	Web-based, graphical	Industry Scientists, Multidisciplinary Teams	All-in-one integrated analysis, dedicated support [16] [14]	Low to Medium

R and the EnhancedVolcano Package

The R environment, particularly through Bioconductor, is a powerhouse for genomic data analysis. The EnhancedVolcano package is a highly configurable function designed to produce publication-ready volcano plots [6]. It simplifies the process of creating complex visualizations by providing sensible defaults while allowing extensive customization of virtually every aesthetic aspect.

Key Features of EnhancedVolcano:

• Automated Labeling: Intelligently fits as many point labels as possible in the plot window to avoid clutter [6].
• Multi-attribute Mapping: Allows simultaneous identification of different data point types using a combination of color, shape, size, encircling, and shading [6].
• Connector Lines: Draws lines between labels and their corresponding points to maximize label placement flexibility and free up plot space [6] [18].
• Flexible Thresholds: Supports custom cut-offs for both p-values and fold changes, including multiple horizontal and vertical threshold lines [6] [18].

Table 2: Key Parameters in the EnhancedVolcano Package

Parameter	Function	Example Values
pCutoff, FCcutoff	Sets significance thresholds for p-value and fold change [6]	10e-6, 1.5
pointSize, labSize	Controls the size of points and labels [6]	3.0, 6.0
col	Defines colour scheme for different point categories (non-significant, FC only, p-value only, both) [6]	c('grey30', 'forestgreen', 'royalblue', 'red2')
drawConnectors	Switches connector lines on/off [6] [18]	TRUE/FALSE
legendPosition	Places the legend (e.g., 'right', 'bottom', 'none') [6]	'right'
shape	Defines the shape of data points [6]	c(1, 4, 23, 25)

Typical Workflow with EnhancedVolcano:

• Perform differential expression analysis using a package like DESeq2 [15] [6] or limma-voom [2].
• Prepare the results object, ensuring it contains columns for p-values, adjusted p-values, log2 fold changes, and gene labels.
• Generate the plot using the EnhancedVolcano() function, adjusting parameters to meet specific visual requirements [6] [18].

Galaxy Platform

Galaxy is an open-source, web-based platform that makes bioinformatic analyses accessible to users without a command-line background [2]. Its Volcano Plot tool provides a guided, form-based interface to generate plots from differential expression results.

Key Features of Galaxy's Volcano Plot Tool:

• Accessibility: No programming knowledge is required; all parameters are set via a graphical form [2].
• Integrated Workflows: Seamlessly connects with other Galaxy tools for a complete analysis, from raw data processing to visualization [2].
• Flexible Labeling: Options to label all significant genes, the top N most significant, or a custom list of genes of interest imported from a file [2].
• Rscript Output: Provides the underlying R code used to generate the plot, serving as an educational bridge and allowing for further customization in RStudio [17].

Typical Workflow in Galaxy:

• Upload a tabular file of differential expression results. The file must contain columns for raw p-values, adjusted p-values (FDR), log fold change, and gene labels [2].
• Use the "Volcano Plot" tool from the dedicated RNA-seq tool set.
• Set parameters in the tool form:
  • Input Columns: Specify which columns correspond to FDR, p-value, logFC, and labels.
  • Thresholds: Define significance (FDR) and fold change thresholds for colouring points.
  • Labeling: Choose which points to label (e.g., top 10 significant genes) [2].
• Execute the tool to produce a PDF of the plot and optionally, the R script.

Commercial Platforms (e.g., Metabolon's Visual Omics)

Commercial bioinformatics platforms like Metabolon's Visual Omics offer integrated solutions that bundle data analysis with visualization tools, including volcano plots [16] [14]. These platforms are designed to be turnkey systems for industry and academic core facilities.

Key Features of Commercial Platforms:

• End-to-End Integration: Volcano plots are one component of a larger, seamless platform that often includes differential analysis, enrichment, and other plotting tools [16] [14].
• High Customization for Visuals: Users can often interact directly with the plot in the browser, panning, zooming, and clicking on points to get more information. Visual aspects like colours and fonts are highly tunable [14].
• Data Export and Reporting: Simplified export of both high-resolution publication-ready graphics and the underlying data tables for further analysis or reporting [14].
• Support and Maintenance: These platforms come with technical support and are regularly updated, reducing the maintenance burden on the research team.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Materials and Reagents

The following table details key reagents and computational tools essential for conducting a typical omics experiment culminating in a volcano plot visualization.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent and Tool Solutions

Item	Function / Explanation
RNA Extraction Kit	Isolates high-quality total RNA from biological samples (e.g., cells, tissue), which is the starting material for RNA-seq.
Next-Generation Sequencer	Generates the raw sequence reads (e.g., FASTQ files) that serve as the primary data source for transcriptomic analysis.
DESeq2 / edgeR / limma-voom	R packages used for statistical testing of differential expression from raw count data, producing the p-values and log2 fold changes plotted in the volcano plot [15] [2] [6].
EnhancedVolcano R Package	A specialized tool for creating publication-ready volcano plots from differential expression results with extensive customization options [6].
ggrepel R Package	Prevents overlapping of text labels on ggplot2-based plots, enhancing readability [15] [17] [9].
3,5-Difluorotoluene	3,5-Difluorotoluene | High Purity | For Research Use
2-Butene-1-thiol	2-Butene-1-thiol | High-Purity Research Grade

The following diagram outlines the logical process for selecting the most appropriate volcano plot tool based on project needs and user expertise.

In conclusion, the landscape of tools for creating volcano plots caters to a diverse range of expertise and project requirements. R with the EnhancedVolcano package is the most powerful and flexible option for users comfortable with programming, enabling deep customization and seamless integration into analytical pipelines. The Galaxy platform democratizes access by providing a user-friendly, code-free interface that promotes reproducibility and is ideal for beginners or for rapid prototyping. Finally, commercial platforms offer a streamlined, supported environment for organizations where an integrated, end-to-end solution is a priority. By aligning tool selection with the criteria outlined in this guide, researchers and drug development professionals can efficiently generate insightful visualizations that drive discovery in omics research.

In the context of a broader guide to visualizing omics data with volcano plots, the critical first step lies in the meticulous preparation of input data for differential expression (DE) analysis. The quality and format of input files directly determine the reliability of statistical results and the validity of subsequent visualizations, including volcano plots that display log2 fold-changes against statistical significance. Incorrectly formatted data can lead to analysis failures or, worse, biologically misleading conclusions. This technical guide provides researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals with essential methodologies for preparing input files for state-of-the-art DE analysis tools, establishing a robust foundation for accurate data interpretation and visualization.

Differential Expression Analysis Tools and Their Input Formats

Multiple established tools are available for differential expression analysis, each with specific strengths and input requirements. The choice of tool often depends on the sequencing technology and the specific statistical approach preferred.

Tool / Environment	Primary Input Format	Key Data Requirements	Typical File Type
DESeq2 (via Bioconductor)	Raw count matrix + sample metadata [19]	- Non-normalized integer counts- Sample information with experimental conditions [20]	Text file (e.g., CSV, TSV)
limma (voom)	Count matrix transformed via voom [21]	- Count data ready for linear modeling- Normalization for mean-variance relationship [22]	Text file (e.g., CSV, TSV)
edgeR	Raw count matrix [23]	- Non-normalized integer counts- Model geared for RNA-Seq [23]	Text file (e.g., CSV, TSV)
InMoose (Python)	Raw count matrix [23]	- Drop-in replacement for limma, edgeR, DESeq2 [23]- Nearly identical results to R counterparts [23]	Text file (e.g., CSV, TSV)
PyDESeq2 (Python)	Raw count matrix [24]	- Python implementation of DESeq2 [24]- Single- and multi-factor analysis [24]	Text file (e.g., CSV, TSV)
A-Lister	Filtered DE results [25]	- Pre-computed lists of DEGs, DEPs, DMPs/DMRs [25]- Primary ID and fold change columns [25]	Delimited text (e.g., .csv, .tsv, .diff)

Tool Implementation Environments

• R/Bioconductor Ecosystem: DESeq2, edgeR, and limma are established standards within this ecosystem, requiring specific object creation (e.g., DESeqDataSetFromMatrix) [19].
• Python Implementations: Tools like InMoose and PyDESeq2 are emerging to provide similar functionality within the Python environment, aiding interoperability and reproducibility between R and Python bioinformatics pipelines [23] [24].
• Downstream Analysis Tools: Software such as A-Lister operates on the output of DE tools, using pre-computed lists of differentially expressed entities for further comparative analysis and set operations [25].

Experimental Protocols for Data Preparation

Protocol 1: Preparing a Count Matrix and Metadata for DESeq2

This protocol details the creation of a DESeq2 dataset object from a raw count matrix, a fundamental step for differential expression analysis [19].

1. Load Raw Count Matrix: Begin with a table where rows represent genes, columns represent samples, and values are non-normalized integer counts. The first column may contain gene identifiers.

2. Create Metadata Data Frame: Construct a data frame describing the experimental design. Row names must match the column names of the count matrix.

3. Create DESeq2 Dataset Object: Use DESeqDataSetFromMatrix to encapsulate counts, metadata, and design.

4. Estimate Size Factors and Normalize: Calculate normalization factors to account for differences in sequencing depth.

Protocol 2: Generating Pseudobulk Data from Single-Cell RNA-seq

This protocol enables differential expression analysis between conditions across cell types from single-cell data using the Decoupler tool [26].

1. Input Data Requirements: Ensure your AnnData object contains:

• Cell type annotations in obs (e.g., annotated)
• Sample (batch) identifiers in obs (e.g., batch)
• Experimental conditions in obs (e.g., tissue)
• A layer with raw gene expression counts (not normalized data)

2. Run Decoupler Pseudobulk Aggregation: Execute the tool with appropriate parameters.

3. Output Interpretation: The tool generates a pseudobulk count matrix where counts from cells of the same type within each biological sample are aggregated, creating inputs suitable for bulk RNA-seq DE tools like edgeR [26].

Protocol 3: RNA-seq Alignment and Quantification for limma-voom

This protocol outlines the steps to generate count data from raw RNA-seq reads for analysis with limma-voom [21].

1. Read Alignment: Align FASTQ files to a reference genome using a gapped aligner.

2. Read Quantification: Generate counts per gene using aligned BAM files.

3. Voom Transformation and limma Analysis: Apply the voom transformation to the count data before linear modeling with limma.

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the complete data preparation workflow for differential expression analysis, from raw data to tool-ready inputs.

Data Validation Workflow

Before proceeding with differential expression analysis, it is crucial to validate the prepared count matrix and metadata as shown in the following workflow.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Item / Resource	Function	Example Use Case
Bioconductor	R-based ecosystem for bioinformatics [19]	Provides DESeq2, edgeR, and limma packages for differential expression analysis
InMoose	Python implementation of limma, edgeR, and DESeq2 [23]	Drop-in replacement for R tools; enables Python-based DE pipelines [23]
PyDESeq2	Python implementation of DESeq2 [24]	Differential expression analysis within Python environment [24]
Decoupler	Pseudobulk aggregation tool [26]	Generates count matrices from single-cell data for bulk DE analysis [26]
A-Lister	Downstream analysis of DE results [25]	Performs set operations on pre-computed lists of differentially expressed entities [25]
MAGE-TAB	Spreadsheet-based format for microarray data [27]	Standardized annotation and sharing of microarray experiments [27]
WARDEN	Comprehensive RNA-seq workflow [28]	End-to-end analysis from FASTQ to differential expression results [28]
5-Formyl-8-hydroxycarbostyril	5-Formyl-8-hydroxycarbostyril | Research Chemical	5-Formyl-8-hydroxycarbostyril: A versatile fluorophore for metal ion sensing and biochemical research. For Research Use Only. Not for human use.
4-amino-2,3,5-trimethylphenol	4-amino-2,3,5-trimethylphenol | Chemical Synthesis & Research	High-purity 4-amino-2,3,5-trimethylphenol for chemical synthesis & material science research. For Research Use Only. Not for human or veterinary use.

Properly formatted input files are the foundational element of robust differential expression analysis and the subsequent creation of informative visualizations like volcano plots. Adherence to the specific requirements of each analytical tool—particularly the use of raw, non-normalized integer counts for count-based tools and well-structured metadata that accurately reflects the experimental design—is essential for generating biologically meaningful results. By following the protocols and guidelines outlined in this technical guide, researchers can ensure their data preparation pipeline produces reliable inputs, thereby establishing a solid basis for identifying statistically significant expression changes and effectively communicating these findings through comprehensive data visualization.

Volcano plots are a fundamental visualization tool in transcriptomics, enabling researchers to simultaneously assess the statistical significance and magnitude of gene expression changes in RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments. This technical guide provides an in-depth framework for generating and interpreting basic volcano plots within the broader context of omics data visualization. We present detailed methodologies for creating volcano plots using multiple computational approaches, including the user-friendly Galaxy platform, R programming with ggplot2, and Python implementations. The tutorial includes comprehensive parameter specifications, threshold selection criteria, and interpretation guidelines tailored for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals. By standardizing the visualization of differential expression results, volcano plots serve as critical tools for identifying biologically significant genes in studies of disease mechanisms, drug responses, and therapeutic development.

A volcano plot is a type of scatterplot that visualizes results from differential gene expression (DGE) analysis by displaying statistical significance versus magnitude of change [2]. This visualization technique derives its name from its characteristic shape, which often resembles an erupting volcano when genes with large fold changes and high statistical significance form prominent "arms" on either side of the plot [29]. In the context of RNA-seq analysis, volcano plots provide an efficient method for identifying genes that are not only statistically significant but also exhibit biologically relevant expression changes, making them indispensable for initial exploratory data analysis and hypothesis generation.

The fundamental components of a volcano plot include the x-axis, which represents the log2 fold change (log2FC) measuring the magnitude of expression difference between conditions, and the y-axis, which displays the -log10 transformed p-values indicating the statistical significance of these changes [30]. This dual-axis approach enables quick visual identification of the most promising candidate genes—those appearing in the upper-left (significantly downregulated) or upper-right (significantly upregulated) sections of the plot [2]. Within the framework of omics data visualization research, volcano plots represent a crucial bridge between statistical output and biological interpretation, allowing researchers to prioritize genes for further validation studies based on both effect size and significance metrics.

Biological Interpretation of Volcano Plots

Key Components and Visual Elements

Interpreting a volcano plot requires understanding its core visual elements and their biological significance. The log2 fold change (x-axis) indicates the direction and magnitude of gene expression changes, where positive values represent upregulated genes in the experimental condition and negative values represent downregulated genes [30]. The -log10 p-value (y-axis) transforms traditional p-values so that more statistically significant results appear higher on the axis, with larger values corresponding to greater significance [31]. This transformation expands the range of significant p-values (e.g., p < 0.01 becomes -log10(0.01) = 2) while compressing non-significant values, creating the characteristic volcano shape where most genes form the "base" near the bottom and statistically significant genes form the "slopes" and "peak" regions [29].

The most biologically interesting genes typically appear in the upper-right and upper-left regions of the plot, representing genes with both large fold changes and high statistical significance [2]. These genes often represent key players in the biological response being studied and are prime candidates for further investigation. For example, in a study comparing luminal pregnant versus lactating mice, the gene Csn1s2b was identified as the most statistically significant with a large fold change—a calcium-sensitive casein important in milk production, which aligns perfectly with the biological context [2]. Such findings demonstrate how volcano plots facilitate the connection between statistical output and biological meaning.

Threshold Selection and Significance Determination

Establishing appropriate thresholds is critical for meaningful biological interpretation. While specific thresholds depend on the research context and experimental design, common defaults include a fold change threshold of 1.5 (log2FC of approximately 0.58) and a significance threshold of FDR < 0.01 [2]. These thresholds create demarcation lines that partition the plot into biologically meaningful regions, allowing researchers to categorize genes as significantly upregulated, significantly downregulated, or not significant [9]. The fold change threshold focuses attention on genes with substantial expression differences likely to have biological impact, while the statistical threshold controls for false discoveries in high-dimensional data.

Table 1: Commonly Used Threshold Values in Volcano Plot Interpretation

Threshold Type	Typical Values	Biological Rationale
Fold Change	±1.5x (log2FC = ±0.58)	Identifies genes with biologically relevant expression changes beyond technical variation
P-value	< 0.05	Standard statistical significance threshold for individual hypotheses
Adjusted P-value (FDR)	< 0.01	More stringent threshold correcting for multiple testing, reducing false discoveries

Experimental Workflow and Methodology

The process of generating a volcano plot from RNA-seq data follows a structured analytical pipeline beginning with raw sequencing data and culminating in visual representation of differential expression results. The complete workflow integrates multiple bioinformatics tools and statistical methods, with the volcano plot serving as the final visualization step that synthesizes the analytical output into an interpretable format.

Diagram 1: Complete RNA-seq analysis workflow from raw data to volcano plot visualization

Input Data Requirements and Preparation

The foundation of a high-quality volcano plot is properly processed and normalized RNA-seq data. The essential input for volcano plot generation is a differential expression results table containing statistical outputs from tools such as DESeq2, edgeR, or limma-voom [2]. This table must include specific columns required for visualization: raw P values, adjusted P values (FDR), log fold change values, and gene labels or identifiers [2]. The data should undergo appropriate normalization and quality control procedures specific to each differential expression tool to ensure that the statistical assumptions underlying the results are met.

Proper experimental design with adequate biological replication is crucial for generating meaningful volcano plots. Most differential expression tools require a minimum of two experimental conditions with at least 2-3 biological replicates each to reliably estimate biological variation and statistical significance [32]. The example dataset from Fu et al. (2015) used in this tutorial compares luminal cells from pregnant versus lactating mice, with results generated using the limma-voom methodology [2]. Before proceeding to visualization, researchers should verify data quality through metrics such as clustering analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and assessment of normalization effectiveness to ensure the reliability of subsequent interpretations [33].

Computational Tools and Platforms

Multiple computational approaches exist for generating volcano plots, ranging from code-based implementations to user-friendly web interfaces. The Galaxy platform provides an accessible entry point for researchers without programming experience, offering a graphical interface for the Volcano Plot tool (version 0.0.7) that allows parameter specification through dropdown menus and input fields [2]. For researchers comfortable with programming, R with ggplot2 provides extensive customization capabilities through scripting [9], while Python with Plotly enables creation of interactive visualizations [31]. The BEAVR (Browser-based tool for the Exploration And Visualization of RNA-seq data) package represents another alternative, providing a Shiny-based interface that uses DESeq2 as its analysis engine while requiring no R knowledge from the user [32].

Table 2: Comparison of Computational Tools for Volcano Plot Generation

Tool/Platform	Programming Requirement	Key Features	Best For
Galaxy	None (web-based interface)	Pre-configured tools, reproducible workflows	Beginners, users without coding experience
R/ggplot2	R programming required	High customization, publication-quality figures	Advanced users, statisticians
Python/Plotly	Python programming required	Interactive plots, integration with analysis pipelines	Python users, web applications
BEAVR	None (Shiny interface)	DESeq2 integration, multiple plot types	DESeq2 users seeking GUI interface

Step-by-Step Protocol: Galaxy Platform Implementation

Data Import and Formatting

The Galaxy platform provides the most accessible method for researchers new to RNA-seq visualization. Begin by importing the differential expression results file into your Galaxy history. The input file should be in tabular format with columns for gene identifiers, raw p-values, adjusted p-values (FDR), and log fold change values [2]. The example dataset from Fu et al. (2015) contains eight columns, with column 2 containing gene labels, column 4 containing log fold change, column 7 containing raw p-values, and column 8 containing adjusted p-values [2]. Ensure the datatype is correctly set to "tabular" using the Galaxy interface to prevent processing errors.

Tool Configuration and Parameter Specification

Execute the Volcano Plot tool (version 0.0.7 in Galaxy) and configure the parameters according to your experimental design and significance criteria. The critical parameters include:

• Input file specification: Select the imported differential expression results file
• Statistical columns: Map the appropriate columns from your dataset to:
  • "FDR (adjusted P value)": Column 8
  • "P value (raw)": Column 7
  • "Log Fold Change": Column 4
  • "Labels": Column 2 [2]
• Significance threshold: Set to 0.01 for FDR
• LogFC threshold: Set to 0.58 (equivalent to 1.5-fold change) [2]
• Points to label: Initially select "None" for a basic plot

Execute the tool with these parameters to generate a basic volcano plot highlighting all significant genes based on the specified thresholds. The resulting visualization will display significantly upregulated genes in red, downregulated genes in blue, and non-significant genes in gray, providing an immediate overview of the differential expression landscape [2].

Advanced Labeling and Customization

For enhanced biological interpretation, the volcano plot can be customized to highlight specific genes of interest. To label the top most significant genes, rerun the Volcano Plot tool with the same parameters but change the "Points to label" option to "Significant" and set "Only label top most significant" to 10 [2]. This approach works well when dealing with hundreds of significant genes where labeling all would create visual clutter. For targeting specific genes based on prior knowledge or biological relevance, create a separate file containing the gene symbols of interest and select the "Input from file" option under "Points to label" [2]. Additionally, enable the "Label Boxes" option in the Plot Options section to improve label readability by placing colored boxes behind gene names.

Step-by-Step Protocol: R and ggplot2 Implementation

Environment Setup and Data Preparation

For researchers requiring advanced customization, R with ggplot2 provides unparalleled flexibility in volcano plot generation. Begin by installing and loading the necessary R packages:

Import the differential expression results, ensuring the data frame contains columns for gene symbols, p-values, adjusted p-values, and log2 fold changes [9]. Create a new column to categorize genes based on significance thresholds:

Basic Plot Construction and Threshold Visualization

Construct the foundational volcano plot using ggplot2, incorporating threshold lines to guide interpretation:

This code generates a scatterplot with dashed lines indicating the fold change and significance thresholds, providing visual reference points for interpreting the distribution of genes [9]. The order of geometric elements is important—adding the threshold lines before the points ensures the points are rendered on top of the lines rather than being obscured.

Enhanced Styling and Custom Labeling

Apply advanced customization to improve visual clarity and highlight biologically significant genes:

This enhanced visualization incorporates color-coding for directionality of expression changes, direct labeling of highly significant genes using ggrepel to prevent overlapping text, and improved styling for publication-ready figures [9]. The color scheme follows conventional practices with blue representing downregulated genes, red representing upregulated genes, and gray indicating non-significant genes.

Successful generation and interpretation of volcano plots requires both computational tools and analytical frameworks. The following table summarizes key resources across different aspects of the RNA-seq visualization pipeline.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools for RNA-seq Visualization

Category	Resource	Specification/Purpose	Application Context
Differential Expression Tools	DESeq2 [32]	Negative binomial model with shrinkage estimation	Primary DGE analysis for count data
	edgeR [2]	Negative binomial models with empirical Bayes methods	DGE analysis, especially with small sample sizes
	limma-voom [2]	Linear models with precision weights	DGE analysis incorporating mean-variance relationship
Visualization Platforms	Galaxy [2]	Web-based scientific analysis platform	Accessible analysis without programming requirements
	BEAVR [32]	Browser-based Shiny application	Interactive exploration of DESeq2 results
	R/ggplot2 [9]	Programming language with graphics package	Highly customizable, publication-quality figures
	Python/Plotly [31]	Programming language with interactive plotting	Web-integrated, interactive visualizations
Data Types	Raw read counts [32]	Unnormalized sequencing counts per gene	Required input for DESeq2, edgeR, and related tools
	Sample treatment matrix [32]	Metadata linking samples to experimental conditions	Essential for proper experimental group specification
Statistical Parameters	FDR threshold [2]	Adjusted p-value cutoff (typically 0.01-0.05)	Controls false discovery rate in multiple testing
	Log2FC threshold [2]	Effect size cutoff (typically 0.58-1.0)	Filters biologically relevant expression changes

Troubleshooting and Quality Assessment

Common Issues and Resolution Strategies

Several technical challenges may arise during volcano plot generation that can affect interpretation. A flat or sparse volcano plot with few significant genes may indicate overly stringent threshold values, insufficient biological replication, or potential normalization issues in the upstream analysis [33]. Conversely, an overly dense plot with excessive significant genes may suggest inappropriate threshold settings or batch effects confounding the results. Address these issues by verifying data quality metrics, examining raw count distributions, and considering biological effect size expectations when setting thresholds.

Visualization artifacts such as skewed distributions, discontinuous patterns, or irregular point clustering often indicate underlying data quality issues that require investigation before biological interpretation. For example, the presence of a prominent horizontal line of points may indicate p-value saturation at the computational precision limit, while asymmetric fold change distributions might suggest systematic biases in the experimental processing [33]. Always examine the relationship between mean expression and variance (typically visualized in MA plots) to ensure the statistical assumptions of the differential expression method are met.

Validation and Interpretation Guidelines

Robust interpretation of volcano plots requires integration with additional analytical approaches. Parallel coordinate plots provide valuable complementary visualization by showing expression patterns across individual samples, helping verify that significant genes show consistent patterns within treatment groups [33]. Scatterplot matrices offer another validation approach by visualizing pairwise sample relationships and confirming that variability between treatments exceeds variability between replicates [33]. Always correlate volcano plot findings with biological context—the most statistically significant genes with large fold changes should make sense within the experimental framework, as demonstrated by the identification of milk protein genes in the lactating versus pregnant mouse comparison [2].

When interpreting results, consider both statistical and biological significance. A gene with modest fold change but extreme statistical significance might represent a consistent but small effect, while a gene with large fold change but borderline significance might represent a variable but potentially important biological response. The integration of gene set enrichment analysis can help determine whether collections of genes with modest individual changes show coordinated directional patterns that reinforce biological interpretation beyond individual gene focus.

Advanced Applications and Future Directions

Volcano plots serve as foundational visualizations that can be enhanced through advanced implementations and integration with complementary data types. Interactive volcano plots enabled by packages such as Plotly in Python or Shiny in R allow researchers to dynamically explore results by hovering over points to reveal gene identifiers, clicking to select genes of interest, and dynamically adjusting thresholds to examine how significance classifications change [30] [31]. These interactive features facilitate deeper engagement with complex datasets and support hypothesis generation by enabling real-time data exploration.

Integration with functional annotation databases represents another powerful enhancement, whereby genes can be color-coded or shaped based on their membership in specific pathways, gene ontology categories, or protein complex associations [30]. This approach helps move beyond individual gene focus to identify coordinated biological processes affected in the experimental condition. For drug development applications, volcano plots can be extended to incorporate drug-target interactions, highlighting genes encoding known drug targets within the differential expression landscape to prioritize translatable findings [34].

Emerging methodologies in RNA-seq visualization continue to expand the analytical framework surrounding volcano plots. The bigPint package introduces specialized plotting tools for detecting normalization issues, differential expression designation problems, and common analysis errors through interactive graphics [33]. As single-cell RNA-seq becomes increasingly prevalent, adaptation of volcano plots to visualize differential expression across cell types or states represents an active area of methodological development. These advances reinforce the central role of volcano plots within the comprehensive visualization toolkit for modern transcriptomics research.

Volcano plots are a cornerstone of omics data visualization, used to quickly identify features (e.g., genes, proteins) that exhibit both large magnitude changes and high statistical significance in differential expression analyses. They plot the negative logarithm of the p-value against the log2 fold change, creating a characteristic two-arm shape that highlights promising candidates for further study [1]. However, a common challenge with standard volcano plots is visual clutter; in large omics datasets, thousands of significant features can crowd the plot, making it difficult to discern specific biological patterns [35].

Pathway Volcano addresses this limitation by integrating biological pathway knowledge directly into the visualization. This R Shiny-based tool uses the Reactome API to filter volcano plots, showing only data associated with user-selected biological pathways [35]. This approach transforms a standard visualization into a hypothesis-driven exploration tool, enabling researchers to move from "what genes are significant?" to "how are my pathways of interest affected?" This guide provides a technical deep-dive into leveraging Pathway Volcano for focused, biologically contextual analysis of omics data.

Technical Setup and Requirements

Software Installation and Dependencies

Pathway Volcano is implemented as a freely available R Shiny package. Successful local execution requires a specific software environment and several R package dependencies.

Table 1: Software and Package Requirements for Pathway Volcano

Component	Version/Name	Purpose & Notes
R	Version 4.3.3 or newer	Base programming environment [35].
RStudio	Version 2024.09.1+	Recommended IDE for running the application [35].
ggplot2	-	Creates the static volcano plots [35].
plotly	-	Adds interactive capabilities to the plots (e.g., tooltips) [35].
shiny	-	Framework for building the web application interface [35].
dplyr	-	For data manipulation and filtering [35].
ReactomeContentService4R	-	Essential package for connecting to and querying the Reactome database [35] [36].

The installation process involves first installing R and RStudio, then ensuring all required R packages are installed. The ReactomeContentService4R package must be installed from Bioconductor before installing Pathway Volcano [36]. The full code, documentation, and example datasets are available on GitHub (https://github.com/thoconne/PathwayVolcano) and have been archived on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15425246) [35].

Input Data Preparation

The tool requires a specific input format to function correctly. The input must be a CSV file where the column names are case-sensitive.

Table 2: Pathway Volcano Input Data Specification

Required Column Name	Data Type	Description
GeneSymbol	Character	Official gene symbols (e.g., "TP53", "EGFR") [36].
log2FoldChange	Numeric	Log2-transformed fold change between experimental conditions [36].
padj	Numeric	Adjusted p-value (e.g., FDR) for multiple testing corrections [36].
Additional Columns	Any	Any extra columns are ignored by the application [36].

This input file is typically generated by differential expression analysis tools such as DESeq2, edgeR, or limma-voom [2]. The analysis begins only after this correctly formatted file is loaded into the application.

Core Workflow and Experimental Protocol

The following diagram and protocol outline the standard operational workflow for a Pathway Volcano analysis.

Figure 1. The step-by-step analytical workflow for using Pathway Volcano, from data preparation to result interpretation.

Protocol: Executing a Pathway Volcano Analysis

• Differential Expression Analysis: Begin with a raw count matrix from an RNA-seq or proteomics experiment. Perform a differential expression analysis using a standard tool (e.g., DESeq2, edgeR, limma-voom) to generate a list of genes with their associated log2 fold changes and adjusted p-values (FDR) [2]. The specific statistical thresholds for significance (e.g., FDR < 0.01, absolute logFC > 0.58) can be defined based on the experimental context [2].

• Data Formatting: Format the results into a CSV file that includes the three required columns: GeneSymbol, log2FoldChange, and padj [36]. Ensure the column names match exactly.

• Application Launch: In RStudio, load the Pathway Volcano application. This will open an interactive R Shiny window in your default web browser.

• Data Input and Pathway Query:

  • Use the application interface to upload the prepared CSV file.
  • The application will use the ReactomeContentService4R package to fetch the list of all available pathways from the Reactome database [35]. This provides the universe of possible pathways for filtering.

• Pathway Selection and Filtering: From the interactive list of Reactome pathways, select one or multiple pathways relevant to your research question. Upon selection, the application filters the uploaded dataset, retaining only the genes that are associated with the selected pathways.

• Visualization and Interpretation: The application generates an interactive volcano plot displaying only the filtered set of genes. The x-axis represents the log2FoldChange and the y-axis the -log10(padj) [35] [1]. This allows for direct visual assessment of which genes within the pathway are significantly dysregulated and to what extent.

• Output and Export: Use the application's interactive features to explore the data further (e.g., hovering for gene details). Finally, export the visualization as a PNG file and the underlying filtered data as a table for reporting and further analysis [35].

Pathway Filtering Logic and Visualization

The core functionality of Pathway Volcano rests on its ability to integrate external pathway knowledge with internal experimental data. The following diagram illustrates this data integration and filtering logic.

Figure 2. The conceptual data flow demonstrating how user-selected pathways from Reactome are used to filter a full omics dataset to generate a focused volcano plot.

This filtering process directly tackles the problem of visual clutter. A standard volcano plot of an RNA-seq dataset may contain hundreds or thousands of significant genes crowded near the "cone" of the volcano, making interpretation challenging [35]. By focusing on a specific pathway, Pathway Volcano declutters the visualization, revealing the behavior of genes within a defined biological context that might otherwise be obscured.

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Pathway-Guided Analysis

Tool or Resource	Type	Function in Analysis
Pathway Volcano	R Shiny Application	Core tool for pathway-guided visualization of differential expression data [35].
Reactome	Pathway Database	Curated database of human biological pathways and reactions; provides the biological context for filtering [35] [37].
DESeq2 / edgeR / limma	Differential Expression Tool	Statistical packages used to generate the input file of log2 fold changes and adjusted p-values from raw sequence data [2].
RStudio	Integrated Development Environment (IDE)	Provides the user interface and console for running R and the Pathway Volcano application locally [35].
MSigDB	Gene Set Collection	A comprehensive database of gene sets; its C2 collection includes Reactome pathways, useful for cross-referencing [38].
DCJTB	DCJTB
fMLPL	fMLPL, CAS:81213-55-0, MF:C27H43N5O6S, MW:565.7 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Application in Multi-Omics and Drug Development

For researchers and drug development professionals, Pathway Volcano's utility extends beyond single-omics RNA-seq analysis. The principles of pathway-guided visualization are equally applicable to proteomics and metabolomics datasets [35]. In the context of multi-omics studies, a researcher could use Pathway Volcano to generate complementary views of the same biological pathway (e.g., "Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Beta-Oxidation") using data from transcriptomics, proteomics, and phosphoproteomics experiments. This facilitates direct comparison of how a pathway is perturbed across different molecular layers, strengthening biological interpretation and supporting the identification of key regulatory nodes.

This approach aligns with modern multi-omics integration frameworks, which emphasize the need to move beyond simple single-omics analysis to a more holistic, knowledge-driven integration [39]. By quickly highlighting pathways that show consistent dysregulation across omics layers, Pathway Volcano can help prioritize pathways for further investigation with more advanced network-based tools like OmicsNet [39], ultimately accelerating the identification of novel drug targets and biomarkers.

Volcano plots are fundamental tools in omics data visualization, providing a powerful means to simultaneously represent the statistical significance (p-value) and magnitude of change (fold change) of thousands of genes, proteins, or other biomolecules from high-throughput experiments [40] [2]. While standard volcano plots effectively display overall data trends, their interpretive power is substantially enhanced through strategic labeling of key features [6]. This technical guide examines methodologies for identifying and labeling top genes and features of interest within volcano plots, framed within a broader thesis on effective omics data visualization.

The fundamental challenge addressed by enhanced labeling is the inherent complexity of omics datasets. As noted in the development of OmicsVolcano, "Advances in omics technologies have generated exponentially larger volumes of biological data; however, their analyses and interpretation are limited to computationally proficient scientists" [40]. Effective labeling strategies bridge this interpretive gap, enabling researchers to quickly identify the most biologically relevant features within their data.

Core Labeling Strategies

Statistical Threshold-Based Labeling

The most straightforward approach to labeling involves applying dual thresholds for statistical significance and fold change to identify the most substantially altered features.

Table 1: Standard Thresholds for Significant Feature Identification

Parameter	Typical Value	Biological Interpretation
P-value cutoff	< 0.05	Standard statistical significance threshold
Adjusted P-value (FDR)	< 0.01	More stringent, accounts for multiple testing [2]
Log Fold Change	>	0.58		Equivalent to 1.5-fold change [2]
Log Fold Change	>	2		Equivalent to 4-fold change [3]

In practice, significantly upregulated features (positive logFC meeting thresholds) are typically colored red, while downregulated features (negative logFC meeting thresholds) are colored blue [2] [3]. The remaining non-significant features appear in grey or black.

Top N Significant Feature Labeling

When hundreds of features meet statistical thresholds, labeling all creates visual clutter. The "Top N" approach labels only the most extreme features based on statistical significance.

Implementation Protocol:

• Apply significance thresholds (p-value/adj.p and logFC) to filter features
• Sort significant features by p-value (smallest to largest)
• Select the top N features (typically 10-20) for labeling
• Apply gene symbols or identifiers as labels to these top features

As demonstrated in RNA-seq visualization tutorials, this approach enables immediate identification of the most statistically significant genes with large fold changes, such as Csn1s2b in mammary gland studies comparing pregnant and lactating mice [2].

Biological Interest-Based Labeling

This strategy labels predefined genes/proteins of biological relevance, regardless of statistical thresholds. This is particularly valuable for highlighting genes in specific pathways, previously identified candidates, or targets of therapeutic interest.

Implementation Protocol:

• Create a reference file containing identifiers for genes/proteins of interest
• Generate the volcano plot with standard significance coloring
• Overlay labels for all features present in the reference file
• Optionally use distinct colors, shapes, or encirclement to highlight these features

In practice, this approach revealed that 29 of 31 cytokine/growth factor genes of interest were significant in luminal pregnant versus lactating mouse comparisons, while Mcl1 and Gmfg fell just outside significance thresholds, suggesting potential post-transcriptional regulation [2].

Technical Implementation

Software Solutions and Capabilities

Multiple software packages provide sophisticated labeling capabilities for volcano plots, each with unique strengths and application environments.

Table 2: Software Solutions for Advanced Volcano Plot Labeling

Software Tool	Environment	Key Labeling Features	Audience
EnhancedVolcano [6]	R/Bioconductor	Highly customizable labeling with connectors, shading, and shape encoding; avoids label clogging	Computational biologists
OmicsVolcano [40]	R/Shiny web app	Interactive exploration; highlights gene sets for cellular processes	Biologists without programming experience
Galaxy Volcano Plot [2]	Web platform	Point-and-click interface; labels top genes or imports custom gene lists	Bench scientists
Partek [3]	Commercial software	Direct plot interaction; click-to-label genes	All research levels
volcano3D [41]	R package	3D volcano and polar plots for three-class data; boxplot annotations	Researchers comparing three groups

EnhancedVolcano R Package Protocol

The EnhancedVolcano package provides particularly extensive customization options for publication-ready figures [6].

Installation and Basic Implementation:

Advanced Labeling Configuration:

This code produces a volcano plot with connectors from labels to points, specific gene highlighting, and a customized legend, maximizing label clarity while minimizing overlap.

Interactive Web Application Protocol

For researchers preferring graphical interfaces, tools like OmicsVolcano and Galaxy provide point-and-click solutions [40] [2].

OmicsVolcano Implementation Workflow:

• Install R and RStudio, then launch OmicsVolcano from GitHub
• Prepare input file with columns: ID, GeneSymbol, Description, logFC, adj.P.Val
• Use interactive interface to:
  • Adjust significance thresholds via sliders
  • Select cellular processes of interest from predefined gene sets
  • Highlight specific genes through search and selection
  • Customize colors and point styles
• Export publication-quality SVG images

The software automatically generates interactive plots where "information about selected genes or proteins is presented in a table below the graph" [40], enabling seamless data exploration.

Visualization Workflows

The decision process for selecting appropriate labeling strategies follows a logical workflow that can be visualized through the following diagram:

Diagram 1: Labeling strategy decision tree for selecting the most appropriate labeling approach based on dataset characteristics and research questions.

The implementation of these labeling strategies follows a consistent technical workflow:

Diagram 2: Technical implementation workflow showing the sequence of operations from data input to final visualization, with parallel labeling strategy options.

Research Reagent Solutions

Successful implementation of these labeling strategies requires specific computational tools and resources.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools for Volcano Plot Analysis

Tool/Reagent	Type	Function in Analysis	Example Sources
EnhancedVolcano	R Package	Publication-ready volcano plots with enhanced coloring and labeling	Bioconductor [6]
OmicsVolcano	R/Shiny Application	Interactive visualization without coding for biologists [40]	GitHub Repository
DESeq2	R Package	Differential expression analysis generating input statistics	Bioconductor [6]
limma-voom	R Package	RNA-seq differential expression methodology	Bioconductor [2]
edgeR	R Package	Differential expression analysis for count-based data	Bioconductor [41]
volcano3D	R Package	3D volcano and polar plots for three-class data	CRAN [41]
Galaxy Platform	Web Platform	Point-and-click volcano plot creation with labeling	Galaxy Project [2]
Partek Flow	Commercial Software	Integrated analysis and visualization suite	Partek [3]

Advanced Applications and Future Directions

Three-Class Data Visualization

For studies comparing more than two conditions, standard volcano plots face limitations. The volcano3D package extends this functionality through 3D volcano plots and polar plots specifically designed for three-group comparisons [41]. These visualizations maintain the ability to label key features while representing more complex experimental designs.

Implementation Example:

Interactive and Multi-Omics Exploration

Emerging tools like MODE (Multidimensional Omics Data Explorer) enable creation of interactive HTML displays for exploring omics data across multiple dimensions [42]. These platforms support sophisticated filtering and labeling based on both numerical and categorical metadata, facilitating integrated visualization of transcriptomics, proteomics, lipidomics, and metabolomics datasets.

Customization for Publication

Effective labeling for publication requires attention to visual clarity principles:

• Use label connectors when point density is high [6]
• Adjust label and point sizes according to figure dimensions
• Employ semantic colors (red for upregulation, blue for downregulation)
• Ensure sufficient color contrast for accessibility
• Include clear legends explaining labeling conventions

Strategic labeling of top genes and features of interest transforms standard volcano plots from general data overviews into precise interpretive tools. By implementing appropriate labeling strategies—whether threshold-based, top-N selection, or biological interest-driven—researchers can dramatically enhance the communicative power of their omics visualizations. The available software ecosystem, from command-line R packages to point-and-click web applications, makes these advanced labeling techniques accessible to researchers across computational skill levels. As omics technologies continue to evolve, sophisticated visualization and labeling approaches will remain essential for extracting biologically meaningful insights from increasingly complex datasets.

In the field of omics research, the ability to visually explore and interrogate complex datasets is paramount for extracting meaningful biological insights. Static visualizations, while valuable for publication, often fall short in facilitating the deep, exploratory analysis required to understand the intricate patterns in genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data. Interactive features transform static plots into dynamic analytical environments where researchers can directly manipulate visual representations to test hypotheses, identify outliers, and discover relationships that might otherwise remain hidden. This technical guide focuses specifically on the implementation and application of three fundamental interactive capabilities—zoom, pan, and selection—within the context of volcano plots for omics data analysis. These features empower researchers to move beyond predetermined visual boundaries and engage in truly responsive data exploration, enabling more nuanced interpretation of complex biological systems in drug development and basic research.

Volcano plots have established themselves as a cornerstone visualization in bioinformatics, simultaneously displaying statistical significance (-log10(p-value)) versus magnitude of change (log2(fold change)) for thousands of genes or proteins [2] [43]. While the static interpretation of these plots is well-documented, their interactive potential remains underutilized in many research contexts. The integration of zoom, pan, and selection tools addresses critical analytical challenges in omics research, including the need to resolve overlapping data points, investigate specific gene subsets, and correlate visual patterns with underlying annotations. For research professionals, these capabilities significantly enhance the efficiency of identifying the most biologically significant targets for further validation in experimental systems, ultimately accelerating the translation of omics discoveries into therapeutic applications.

Core Interactive Features: Technical Specifications and Implementation

Zoom and Pan Functionality

Zoom and pan functionalities provide researchers with essential navigation capabilities for exploring volcano plots across different scales and regions. Zoom functionality allows for both progressive and region-specific magnification of plot areas, enabling detailed examination of densely clustered data points that would be indistinguishable in a static overview. Technically, zoom can be implemented through multiple interaction modalities, including mouse wheel scrolling for progressive zooming, rectangular area selection for targeted magnification, and pinch gestures on touch-enabled devices for intuitive scaling [44]. The computational implementation typically involves recalculating plot boundaries and rescaling graphical elements while maintaining the aspect ratio to prevent visual distortion. For optimal performance with large omics datasets, efficient algorithms must render only the data points within the current viewport, employing level-of-detail techniques that simplify rendering at distant zoom levels while preserving full resolution when sufficiently zoomed.

Pan functionality operates complementarily to zoom, allowing researchers to translate the viewport across the plot surface without altering the magnification level. This is particularly valuable for comparing distant clusters of significant genes or transitioning between upregulated and downregulated regions of the volcano plot. From an implementation perspective, panning typically captures mouse drag events and applies corresponding translation transforms to the plot's coordinate system [44]. Effective panning interfaces provide visual feedback through cursor changes (e.g., closed hand icon) and maintain smooth animation during the drag operation to preserve the user's spatial orientation within the dataset. For genomic applications, synchronized panning across multiple linked visualizations (e.g., volcano plot, heatmap, pathway diagram) represents a more advanced implementation that enables correlated exploration of different data representations.

Selection Tools and Data Point Interrogation

Selection tools constitute perhaps the most analytically powerful interactive feature for volcano plot interrogation, enabling direct identification and isolation of specific gene subsets based on spatial distribution. Basic rectangular selection allows researchers to define an area of interest and extract all data points contained within its boundaries, while lasso selection offers more flexible, free-form selection capabilities for irregular clusters [45] [44]. The technical implementation involves mapping screen coordinates to the data coordinate system and testing which points satisfy the selection geometry, with efficient spatial indexing structures (e.g., k-d trees, quadtrees) dramatically improving performance for large omics datasets.

Upon selection, immediate visual feedback is essential—typically achieved through highlight coloring, boundary emphasis, or labeling [45]. More advanced implementations enable attribute-based filtering combined with spatial selection, such as selecting all genes within a specific region that also meet particular significance thresholds. The analytical power of selection tools is maximized when integrated with linked visualizations and data tables, where selecting points in the volcano plot automatically highlights corresponding elements in a parallel heatmap or data grid [46]. This bidirectional linking enables researchers to correlate positional information in the volcano plot with expression patterns across samples or functional annotations from gene databases.

Beyond geometric selection, brush tools represent a specialized implementation that combines selection with continuous adjustment capability. Brushing allows researchers to interactively adjust selection boundaries while observing the real-time impact on the selected point set, effectively creating a dynamic filter for exploring marginal distributions in the volcano plot [46]. For collaborative analysis, selection state preservation and sharing functionalities enable research teams to exchange curated gene sets of interest, facilitating consistent annotation of significant findings across organizational boundaries.

Table 1: Technical Specifications of Core Interactive Features

Feature	Implementation Methods	Performance Considerations	Bioinformatics Applications
Zoom	Mouse wheel, pinch-to-zoom, programmatic zoom to preset levels	Level-of-detail rendering, data point clustering for large datasets, viewport culling	Resolving overlapping genes, inspecting dense clusters near origin, detailed view of significant hits
Pan	Click-and-drag, navigational mini-map, arrow key navigation	Smooth animation maintenance, synchronized transformation across linked views	Comparing up/down-regulated regions, transitioning between significance thresholds
Selection	Rectangular, lasso, brush, attribute-based filtering	Efficient point-in-polygon tests, spatial indexing, partial preselection	Isolating genes of interest, creating candidate lists, cross-filtering with other visualizations

Hover Tools and Dynamic Labeling

Hover tools represent a crucial interactive feature that balances information density with clarity by displaying detailed annotations only on demand. When a researcher hovers the cursor over a data point in a volcano plot, a tooltip typically appears containing pre-specified information such as gene symbol, exact fold change values, adjusted p-values, and functional annotations [43]. The technical implementation involves mouse position tracking, hit testing to determine which data element is being referenced, and dynamic overlay rendering that avoids obscuring adjacent points. For responsive performance, annotation data is typically cached client-side with efficient data structures that enable rapid lookup based on point identifier.

Dynamic labeling extends the hover concept by automatically adjusting label placement to minimize overlap, particularly valuable when multiple interesting points are clustered in a small region of the plot. Advanced implementations use collision detection algorithms to reposition labels in real-time as the user pans or zooms, ensuring persistent readability without manual intervention [43]. For persistent identification of important genes, "always-on" labeling can be applied to subsets meeting specific criteria (e.g., top 10 most significant genes) [2], with the labeling priority recalculated dynamically as the view changes. This combination of transient and persistent labeling strategies creates a multi-layered information system that adapts to the researcher's current focus and analytical needs.

Implementation Across Platforms and Tools

Programming Libraries and Frameworks

The implementation of interactive features in volcano plots varies significantly across programming environments, with each offering distinct advantages for specific research contexts. Plotly, a popular visualization library for Python and R, provides comprehensive interactivity out-of-the-box, including zoom, pan, selection, and hover tools [43]. In Plotly, these capabilities are typically enabled by default or through simple configuration parameters, with extensive customization options for tailoring the interactions to specific research needs. The library's web-based rendering foundation ensures consistent cross-platform performance and facilitates embedding in web applications for sharing interactive results with collaborators.

D3.js represents a more flexible but technically demanding approach to implementing interactive volcano plots. As a lower-level visualization library, D3 requires explicit implementation of each interactive feature but offers virtually unlimited customization possibilities [46]. For example, zooming in D3 typically involves defining a zoom behavior and applying it to the plot container, while selection tools require implementing brush behaviors with custom logic for handling selected elements. The significant development overhead of D3-based implementations is offset by the potential for creating highly specialized analytical interfaces tailored to specific omics research workflows, such as integrating with particular gene annotation databases or experimental platforms.

Table 2: Platform Comparison for Interactive Volcano Plot Implementation

Platform/Tool	Zoom/Pan Capabilities	Selection Methods	Integration with Omics Workflows
MATLAB	Interactive axes with programmable limits, data tip display	Rectangular selection, data brushing, linked plots	Direct integration with statistical toolboxes, microarray analysis functions [44]
R/EnhancedVolcano	Limited native interactivity; requires Plotly/shiny for full features	Point clicking identification, conditional labeling	Seamless integration with Bioconductor, DESeq2, and edgeR pipelines [47]
Python/Plotly	Out-of-the-box zoom/pan with multiple modes, configurable axes	Lasso and rectangular selection, click events, custom hover	Pandas DataFrame compatibility, Jupyter notebook embedding [43]
JavaScript/D3.js	Fully customizable zoom behaviors, touch gesture support	Flexible brush implementations, cross-filter linking	Web-based deployment, REST API connectivity for genomic databases [46]

Specialized Bioinformatics Applications

Specialized bioinformatics tools and platforms have incorporated interactive volcano plot features with domain-specific enhancements that address particular analytical needs in omics research. Galaxy, a web-based bioinformatics platform, includes volcano plot functionality with interactive features that enable researchers to identify significant genes and export selections for further analysis [2]. The platform's implementation is particularly valuable for researchers seeking analytical power without programming expertise, as the interface provides intuitive controls for adjusting significance thresholds and visually identifying genes meeting multiple criteria.

Orange Data Mining offers another accessible approach through its visual programming interface, where the Volcano Plot widget provides selection tools that integrate seamlessly with other data mining components [45]. In this environment, genes selected in the volcano plot can be immediately visualized in downstream components such as heatmaps, data tables, or statistical analyses, creating a fluid analytical workflow without manual data transfer between steps. This integration exemplifies how interactive visualization serves as a connective tissue within comprehensive omics analysis pipelines rather than existing as an isolated endpoint.

For enterprise-scale applications in pharmaceutical research and development, commercial platforms like Partek Genomics Suite incorporate sophisticated interactive volcano plots with specialized features for large, multi-experiment datasets [43]. These implementations often include simultaneous visualization of multiple contrast groups, synchronized selection across experimental conditions, and direct links to pathway analysis tools that help researchers quickly place significant genes in biological context. The availability of these specialized implementations across the spectrum from open-source to commercial platforms ensures that researchers can select tools appropriate for their technical resources and analytical requirements.

Experimental Protocols for Interactive Volcano Plot Analysis

Data Preparation and Preprocessing

The foundation of effective interactive volcano plot analysis begins with rigorous data preparation and preprocessing to ensure the statistical integrity of the visualization. For RNA-seq data analysis, the typical workflow starts with raw read quantification using tools like Salmon or HTSeq, followed by normalization and differential expression analysis using established packages such as DESeq2, edgeR, or limma-voom [2]. The differential expression analysis generates three essential numerical values for each gene: the log2 fold change (representing magnitude of effect), the raw p-value (representing statistical significance), and the adjusted p-value (corrected for multiple testing, typically using Benjamini-Hochberg or similar methods).

These computed values must then be structured into an appropriate data frame for visualization, with genes as rows and specific columns for log2 fold change, raw p-value, adjusted p-value (FDR), and gene identifiers [2]. Additional columns may include gene symbols, functional annotations, or expression levels that can be accessed during interactive exploration. For the visualization itself, two derived columns are typically created: the x-axis values (log2 fold change) and y-axis values (-log10(adjusted p-value)) [43]. This transformation emphasizes highly significant results (low adjusted p-values appear higher on the y-axis) while creating a symmetric distribution around zero on the x-axis. Data quality checks at this stage should verify that fold change values are properly centered and that the distribution of p-values is reasonable, with enrichment of small p-values for truly differential genes rather than uniform distribution expected under the null hypothesis.

Interactive Analysis Workflow

The interactive analysis of volcano plots follows a systematic workflow that progresses from broad overview to targeted investigation, leveraging different interactive features at each stage. The protocol begins with an initial global assessment of the data distribution, observing the overall shape of the volcano plot to identify the balance between upregulated and downregulated genes, the density of points near the origin, and the presence of any unusual patterns that might indicate technical artifacts. At this stage, adjusting the overall view through panning can help orient the researcher to the general characteristics of the dataset before proceeding to more targeted investigation.

The next phase involves establishing significance thresholds and identifying candidate genes of interest. While predetermined thresholds (e.g., FDR < 0.01 and |log2FC| > 0.58) provide an initial filtering [2], interactive exploration allows researchers to dynamically adjust these boundaries and immediately observe the impact on the number and identity of significant genes. The zoom functionality becomes particularly valuable here for resolving dense clusters near threshold boundaries where small adjustments can include or exclude numerous genes. Once thresholds are established, selection tools enable the creation of candidate gene lists based on spatial characteristics, such as selecting the most extreme outliers in both significance and fold change or isolating genes within specific functional categories based on their positional clustering.

The final stage focuses on detailed interrogation of selected genes and correlation with external biological knowledge. Hover tools reveal basic annotations for individual points, while more comprehensive investigation involves selecting specific genes and accessing linked resources such as gene ontology databases, pathway visualizations, or expression patterns in related experiments [43] [44]. For rigorous analysis, this process should include both hypothesis-driven investigation (specifically searching for genes of known biological interest) and discovery-driven exploration (identifying unexpected significant genes that merit further investigation). The interactive session state—including zoom level, selection sets, and threshold settings—should be documented or saved to ensure analytical reproducibility, particularly for collaborative projects or publication purposes.

Visual Workflows and Analytical Processes

The integration of interactive features within the omics data analysis workflow creates a more fluid and iterative research process. The following diagram illustrates the central role of interactive visualization in connecting computational analysis with biological interpretation:

The analytical process extends beyond the volcano plot itself to include connections with complementary visualizations and data sources. The following diagram illustrates how interactive selections in a volcano plot can propagate through a linked analytical environment to enable comprehensive biological interpretation:

Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools

The effective implementation and application of interactive volcano plots requires both computational tools and analytical frameworks. The following table details key resources that support this functionality:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools for Interactive Volcano Plot Analysis

Tool/Resource	Type	Primary Function	Implementation Notes
Plotly	Python/R Library	Interactive plotting with zoom, pan, hover	Enables web-based interactivity in computational notebooks; supports D3.js rendering [43]
EnhancedVolcano	R/Bioconductor Package	Specialized volcano plot creation	Provides standardized labeling options; integrates with DESeq2/edgeR outputs [47]
D3.js	JavaScript Library	Custom interactive visualization	Maximum flexibility; requires significant development expertise [46]
MATLAB Bioinformatics Toolbox	Commercial Software	Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis	Includes mavolcanoplot function with interactive gene selection [44]
Orange Data Mining	Visual Programming Platform	Interactive data exploration	Volcano Plot widget with selection propagation to connected components [45]
Galaxy Platform	Web-Based Bioinformatics	Accessible analytical workflows	Point-and-click volcano plot with significance threshold controls [2]
DESeq2/edgeR	R/Bioconductor Packages	Differential expression analysis	Statistical foundation for volcano plot coordinates [2]

Interactive features represent a transformative advancement in the visualization and interpretation of omics data through volcano plots. The integration of zoom, pan, and selection tools creates an analytical environment where researchers can actively engage with their data rather than passively observe static representations. This dynamic interaction facilitates deeper biological insight, more efficient identification of candidate biomarkers or therapeutic targets, and ultimately accelerates the translation of genomic discoveries into clinical applications. As omics technologies continue to evolve, producing increasingly complex and multidimensional datasets, the importance of sophisticated interactive visualization capabilities will only grow. The technical implementations and analytical workflows described in this guide provide a foundation for researchers to leverage these powerful tools in their pursuit of biological understanding and therapeutic innovation.

Solving Common Challenges: Strategies for Crowded Plots and Enhanced Clarity

In the field of omics research, the volume and complexity of data generated from high-throughput technologies like RNA sequencing, proteomics, and metabolomics present significant visualization challenges. A single experiment can yield thousands to millions of data points, creating a fundamental problem: overplotting. This occurs when data points overlap in a visualization, obscuring true patterns, distribution density, and potentially significant findings.

The volcano plot has emerged as an indispensable tool for visualizing differential expression results, as it enables researchers to quickly identify features (e.g., genes, proteins, metabolites) that exhibit both large magnitude changes and statistical significance [40] [14]. However, with datasets often containing tens of thousands of features, standard scatter plots become ineffective, transforming into an uninformative mass of overlapping points where critical biological insights remain hidden.

This guide provides a comprehensive technical framework for overcoming visualization challenges in large-scale omics data, with a specialized focus on optimizing volcano plots for clarity, accuracy, and insight generation in pharmaceutical and basic research applications.

Core Techniques for Preventing Overlap

Jittering and Dithering

Jittering is a foundational technique that applies a small amount of random noise to the positional coordinates of data points. In the context of volcano plots or categorical scatter plots, this typically means adding slight horizontal displacement to points that would otherwise align perfectly on a discrete axis [48].

• Implementation: In Python's Seaborn library, this can be implemented via the sns.stripplot() function with the jitter parameter set to True. The degree of jitter can be controlled to balance point separation with positional accuracy [48].
• Best Use Cases: Ideal for visualizing the distribution of data points across different experimental conditions or groups within an omics dataset before formal differential expression testing.

Dithering represents a more controlled approach to jittering, where the random noise is constrained to a specific, defined range. This provides greater precision than basic jittering while still mitigating overlap [49].

• Implementation Example:

• Advantage: Preserves the overall structure and distribution of the data while ensuring individual points remain visible [49].

Density-Based Point Adjustment

For datasets with extreme density variations, adjusting point size based on local density effectively communicates point concentration without sacrificing the representation of individual data points.

• Methodology: Points in low-density regions are displayed larger, while points in high-density regions are shrunk [49]. This creates a visual representation where sparsely populated areas remain prominent, and densely packed areas remain discernible without complete overlap.
• Implementation: This requires calculating local densities, often through kernel density estimation or binning procedures, before dynamically setting the size parameter in plotting functions.

Strategic Use of Transparency (Alpha Blending)

Alpha blending adjusts the transparency of individual points so that areas with multiple overlapping points appear darker due to cumulative opacity.

• Application to Volcano Plots: When visualizing thousands of genes or metabolites on a volcano plot, setting alpha=0.5 or lower ensures that regions with a high density of non-significant features do not completely obscure the visualization, while statistically significant outliers naturally draw the eye due to their relative uniqueness and brighter appearance.
• Benefit: This technique requires no data transformation, preserving the exact coordinates and values of all data points while providing an intuitive visual representation of density.

Alternative Plot Types for Extreme-Density Data

Swarm Plots represent a sophisticated advancement over basic jittering. Algorithms prevent any overlap by positioning points in a non-overlapping arrangement along the categorical axis, effectively creating a "beeswarm" pattern that perfectly represents the underlying distribution [49].

• Consideration: While excellent for revealing true distribution shapes and individual data points, swarm plots can become computationally intensive for very large datasets (e.g., >100,000 points) [49].

FacetGrids (or Trellis Plots) address overlap by dividing the dataset into multiple subsets based on key categorical variables and creating separate, smaller plots for each subset [49].

• Relevance to Omics: Researchers can facet by gene ontology terms, chromosomal location, or expression families, enabling clear visualization of patterns within biologically relevant subgroups that might be hidden in a consolidated plot.

Table 1: Comparison of Core Overplotting Solutions

Technique	Mechanism	Best for Dataset Size	Pros	Cons
Jittering	Adds random positional noise	Small to Medium	Simple to implement; preserves individual points	Can obscure true precise positions
Dithering	Adds controlled random noise	Small to Medium	More precise than jittering	Requires parameter tuning
Density-Based Sizing	Adjusts point size by local density	Medium to Large	Intuitive density representation	Can introduce size-based bias
Alpha Blending	Adjusts point transparency	Any size	Simple; excellent density indication	Can wash out colors
Swarm Plot	Non-overlapping point algorithm	Small to Medium	Perfect distribution view; no overlap	Computationally heavy for large N
FacetGrid	Divides data into multiple plots	Large to Very Large	Eliminates overlap; enables comparison	Can fragment view of overall data

The Volcano Plot: A Specialized Tool for Omics Data

The volcano plot is specifically designed to handle the challenge of visualizing high-dimensional omics data by transforming complex statistical relationships into an intuitive format. It enables researchers to simultaneously assess both the statistical significance (reliability) and magnitude of change (biological impact) of thousands of features in a single visualization [2] [50].

Components and Interpretation

• X-axis: Represents the log2 fold change (log2FC) in feature abundance between experimental conditions (e.g., diseased vs. healthy, treated vs. untreated). Features with positive values are upregulated in the condition of interest, while negative values indicate downregulation [2] [50].
• Y-axis: Typically displays the -log10(p-value) or -log10(adjusted p-value) from statistical tests of differential expression. This transformation means that features with greater statistical significance (smaller p-values) appear higher on the axis [2].
• Threshold Lines: Vertical dashed lines on the x-axis often represent the minimum fold change considered biologically relevant (e.g., ±0.58 for 1.5-fold change), while a horizontal line indicates the statistical significance threshold (e.g., p < 0.01) [2].

Creating a Volcano Plot from RNA-seq Data

The following workflow outlines the standard methodology for generating a volcano plot from differential gene expression results, as exemplified in RNA-seq analysis [2]:

Step-by-Step Protocol:

• Data Input: Import a tabular file containing differential expression results. Essential columns include: feature identifiers (e.g., GeneSymbol), raw p-values, adjusted p-values (FDR), and log fold change values [2].
• Threshold Definition: Establish biologically relevant thresholds for significance. A common standard is FDR < 0.01 and absolute logFC > 0.58 (equivalent to a 1.5-fold change) [2].
• Plot Generation: Create a scatter plot with logFC on the x-axis and -log10(p-value) on the y-axis.
• Color Coding: Apply distinct colors (e.g., red for upregulated, blue for downregulated) to features passing both significance thresholds. Non-significant features are typically shown in gray [2].
• Overlap Management: Implement transparency (alpha < 0.6) to manage dense clusters of non-significant features.
• Feature Annotation: Label top significant features (e.g., top 10 by p-value) or a pre-defined set of genes of interest to aid interpretation [2].
• Export: Generate a high-resolution, publication-ready image (e.g., SVG or PDF format) [40].

Advanced Customization and Interactive Approaches

Static volcano plots, while powerful, can still struggle to clearly present all information in extremely dense datasets. Advanced software tools address this through interactivity.

OmicsVolcano is an example of an open-source tool that creates interactive volcano plots, allowing users to:

• Pan and zoom to explore dense regions [40].
• Click on individual points to reveal detailed annotations [40].
• Dynamically highlight genes associated with specific biological processes or pathways [40].
• Customize significance thresholds in real-time to explore different stringency levels [40].

Table 2: Bioinformatics Tools for Volcano Plot Creation

Tool/Software	Primary Interface	Key Strengths	Overlap Management Features
OmicsVolcano	R/Shiny (Web-based)	Interactive exploration; process-based highlighting	Zooming, panning, selective highlighting
Galaxy Volcano Plot	Web-based GUI	User-friendly; no coding required	Point labeling options, transparency control
EnhancedVolcano	R/Bioconductor	High customization of static plots	Adjustable point size, selective labeling
Custom R/Python Scripts	Code (ggplot2, Seaborn)	Maximum flexibility and reproducibility	Full access to alpha, jitter, faceting

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful visualization and analysis require not only computational tools but also high-quality data generated from wet-lab procedures. The following table details key reagents and materials central to producing omics data suitable for volcano plot visualization.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Omics Data Generation

Reagent/Material	Function in Omics Workflow	Specific Application Example
RNA Sequencing Kits (e.g., Illumina)	Library preparation for transcriptome profiling	Generating raw count data for differential gene expression analysis [2].
Proteomics Kits (e.g., TMT/Isobaric Labeling)	Multiplexed protein quantification	Measuring relative protein abundance across multiple samples for proteomic volcano plots [40].
Metabolomics Platforms (e.g., Metabolon)	Global metabolite identification and quantification	Providing fold-change and p-value data for metabolite volcano plots [14].
Primary Antibodies	Target protein detection and validation	Western blot confirmation of key protein hits identified from proteomic volcano plots.
qPCR Assays	Gene expression validation	Technical validation of significant genes from RNA-seq volcano plots [2].
Cell Line Models	In vitro disease modeling	Generating treated vs. control samples for differential expression testing (e.g., luminal pregnant vs. lactating mouse cells [2]).
CRISPR/Cas9 Systems	Functional gene perturbation	Validating the biological role of hits identified from volcano plot analysis via gene knockout.

The challenge of visualizing thousands of data points without overlap is not merely a technical obstacle but a fundamental requirement for extracting meaningful biological insights from modern omics experiments. By strategically employing techniques like jittering, alpha blending, and density-based adjustments, and by leveraging the specialized capabilities of volcano plots—particularly interactive versions—researchers can transform overwhelming datasets into clear, actionable visual narratives.

The future of omics data visualization lies in the continued development of intuitive, interactive platforms that empower biologists to explore their data dynamically, ask complex questions in real-time, and ultimately accelerate the pace of discovery in drug development and basic research.

Within the broader context of a guide to visualizing omics data with volcano plots research, the creation of publication-ready figures is a critical final step in the computational analysis pipeline. Volcano plots, which simultaneously display statistical significance (-log10 P-value) versus magnitude of change (log2 fold-change) for thousands of features (e.g., genes, metabolites), serve as a cornerstone for visualizing differential expression patterns in omics studies [6] [51] [3]. While functional accuracy is paramount, visual aesthetics—encompassing color selection, point sizing, and label formatting—significantly enhance a figure's ability to communicate scientific findings effectively [52] [53]. A well-executed volcano plot ensures that biologically significant features are immediately identifiable to readers, including those with color vision deficiencies, and meets the stringent stylistic requirements of scientific journals. This technical guide provides researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals with detailed methodologies for transforming standard volcano plots into refined, publication-quality visualizations using the EnhancedVolcano package in R [6].

Core Principles of Color in Scientific Visualization

Effective color usage in scientific figures serves two primary purposes: to clearly distinguish different data classes and to guide the viewer's attention to the most important findings [52] [53].

Color Theory Fundamentals

• Color Models for Digital Publications: The RGB (Red, Green, Blue) additive color model is recommended for figures destined for digital publication, as it mirrors how computer screens display color [53]. In this model, colors are specified using hexadecimal codes (e.g., #4285F4 for Google blue) [54] or RGB triplets (e.g., 66, 133, 244 for the same blue) [54].
• Color Scheme Categories: Select color schemes based on the nature of your data [52]:
  • Qualitative: For categorical data without inherent ordering (e.g., different experimental groups).
  • Sequential: For quantitative data ordered from low to high values.
  • Diverging: For highlighting deviations from a central value (e.g., positive and negative fold-changes).

Ensuring Accessibility

• Colorblind-Friendly Palettes: Approximately 8% of men and 0.5% of women have some form of color vision deficiency [52]. Avoid problematic color combinations like red-green and utilize online tools (e.g., ColorBrewer) to select accessible palettes [53].
• Contrast Verification: Ensure sufficient contrast between elements by verifying that colors have different lightness values. Tools like Web Accessibility in Mind's Contrast Checker can validate chosen color pairs [53].

Table 1: Example Color Palettes for Volcano Plots

Palette Type	Non-Significant (NS)	Log2 FC Only	P-Value Only	Both Significant	Use Case
Default	#000000 (black)	#000000 (black)	#000000 (black)	#FF0000 (red3)	Basic contrast
Grayscale	#5F6368 (gray)	#5F6368 (gray)	#5F6368 (gray)	#202124 (near black)	Monochromatic publications
Google Colors	#5F6368 (gray)	#4285F4 (blue)	#FBBC05 (yellow)	#34A853 (green)	High distinctiveness
Colorblind-Friendly	#F1F3F4 (light gray)	#4285F4 (blue)	#EA4335 (red)	#0F9D58 (green) [54]	Maximum accessibility

Experimental Protocols for EnhancedVolcano Customization

Installation and Basic Implementation

The following protocol outlines the installation and basic usage of the EnhancedVolcano package for creating customizable volcano plots.

This foundational code establishes the basic volcano plot using the airway dataset, which compares gene expression in airway smooth muscle cells treated with dexamethasone versus untreated controls [6]. The differential expression analysis is performed using DESeq2, a standard package for RNA-seq data analysis.

Advanced Color Customization Protocol

Beyond the default settings, EnhancedVolcano provides extensive parameters for color customization to improve visual clarity and align with publication requirements.

In this configuration, the col parameter specifically controls the coloring of points in four distinct categories: (1) non-significant features, (2) features with only large fold-changes, (3) features with only significant p-values, and (4) features significant for both fold-change and p-value [6]. The colAlpha parameter adjusts transparency, which is particularly useful for datasets with high feature density to mitigate overplotting.

Custom Point Sizes and Shapes Protocol

Strategic manipulation of point sizes and shapes enhances the visual hierarchy, emphasizing the most biologically relevant features while maintaining clarity in dense regions of the plot.

The pointSize parameter can accept either a single value for all points or a vector of four values corresponding to the same significance categories as the color parameter [6]. Similarly, the shape parameter allows assignment of different shapes to these categories, with values corresponding to ggplot2 shape encodings (e.g., 1 = circle, 4 = cross, 23 = diamond, 25 = triangle) [6].

Optimized Label Placement Protocol

Effective label placement is crucial for preventing overlapping text and ensuring key features are identifiable without manual intervention.

The drawConnectors parameter significantly improves label placement by connecting labels to their corresponding points with lines when direct labeling would cause overlap [6]. The selectLab parameter allows manual specification of which features to label, particularly useful for highlighting genes or metabolites of specific biological interest.

Advanced Legend Customization Protocol

For publication figures, legend customization ensures proper interpretation while maintaining visual consistency with journal formatting requirements.

This protocol demonstrates how to implement italicized legend text using expression() and bquote() functions for statistical notation, which is often required by scientific publications [55]. The scale_colour_manual() function provides additional control when using custom color schemes, ensuring proper mapping between colors and legend labels.

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the comprehensive workflow for creating publication-ready volcano plots, incorporating all customization aspects covered in this guide.

This workflow diagram outlines the sequential process for optimizing volcano plots, highlighting the integration of core design principles at each stage. The process begins with differential expression data and progresses through specific customization steps, with color theory, technical implementation, and visual hierarchy considerations informing multiple stages of the workflow.

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Volcano Plot Creation

Tool/Category	Specific Examples	Function	Implementation in Workflow
Statistical Analysis	DESeq2, EdgeR, Limma (R packages)	Perform differential expression analysis to generate fold-change and p-value statistics	Data Processing Stage
Visualization Package	EnhancedVolcano (R package) [6]	Specialized volcano plot creation with extensive customization options	All Visualization Stages
Color Palette Tools	ColorBrewer [53], Viridis [52]	Provide colorblind-friendly palettes for accessible visualizations	Color Customization Stage
Accessibility Checkers	WebAIM Contrast Checker [53], Color Oracle	Verify color choices for color vision deficiency compatibility	Color Customization & Final Review
Expression Syntax	R expression(), bquote() functions [55]	Format mathematical and italicized text in labels and legends	Legend Formatting Stage
Layout Algorithms	ggrepel (R package)	Automate intelligent label placement to minimize overlaps	Label Optimization Stage

The creation of publication-ready volcano plots requires both statistical rigor and thoughtful design execution. By methodically applying the color principles, customization protocols, and optimization strategies detailed in this guide, researchers can transform standard differential expression visualizations into compelling scientific figures that accurately and accessibly communicate key findings. The EnhancedVolcano package in R provides a comprehensive toolkit for implementing these enhancements, while the fundamental design principles ensure that resulting figures meet both aesthetic standards and accessibility requirements. As the final visual representation of complex omics analyses, these optimized volcano plots serve as critical tools for disseminating research insights to the scientific community.

Volcano plots are a cornerstone of omics data visualization, providing a powerful means to represent the results of differential expression analyses by plotting statistical significance (-log10(P value)) against the magnitude of change (log2(Fold Change)) for thousands of features simultaneously [35] [2]. This visualization technique enables researchers to quickly identify the most biologically relevant features—those with both large effect sizes and high statistical significance. However, as omics datasets continue to grow in size and complexity, conventional volcano plots face a critical limitation known as the "cone" problem [35].

The cone problem manifests as a dense crowding of data points in the central region of the volcano plot, particularly near the base of the "cone," where features with moderate but potentially biologically important changes are obscured by the sheer volume of data [35]. In a typical RNA-sequencing or proteomics experiment, differential expression analysis can yield thousands of significant features after standard filtering. Even after applying significance thresholds, hundreds or thousands of points may remain, creating visual overlap that masks crucial biological insights. This overcrowding is especially problematic for features with moderate fold changes that nonetheless play important roles in coordinated biological processes.

Table 1: Key Challenges of Conventional Volcano Plots in Large Omics Datasets

Challenge	Impact on Data Interpretation	Consequence for Researchers
Overplotting in Central Regions	Significant features are visually obscured by overlapping points [35]	Important biological signals remain hidden despite passing significance thresholds
Limited Visual Resolution	Inability to distinguish individual data points of interest in dense areas [35]	Difficulty in identifying and annotating key features for further investigation
Context-Agnostic Filtering	Conventional filtering based solely on P-value and fold change ignores biological relationships [35]	Failure to recognize functionally coordinated changes across related features

Pathway-based filtering represents a paradigm shift in addressing these limitations by introducing biological context as a primary filter for visualization. Rather than attempting to display all significant features simultaneously, this approach enables researchers to focus on specific pathways or biological processes of interest, effectively decluttering the visualization while highlighting functionally related changes [35]. The remainder of this technical guide explores the methodological framework for implementing pathway-based filtering, demonstrates its application through concrete examples, and provides practical implementation strategies for researchers engaged in omics data analysis and drug development.

Pathway-Based Filtering: A Conceptual and Methodological Framework

Theoretical Foundation: From Isolated Features to Biological Systems

Pathway-based filtering operates on the fundamental principle that biological meaningfulness extends beyond statistical significance alone. While conventional volcano plots excel at identifying individual features with extreme changes, they often miss subtle but coordinated changes across multiple features participating in the same biological process. The pathway-based approach addresses this limitation by integrating prior biological knowledge from established pathway databases, with Reactome being prominently utilized in implemented solutions [35].

The theoretical foundation of this method rests on several key premises. First, biologically significant phenomena typically involve coordinated changes in multiple molecular components functioning within the same pathway or process. Second, these coordinated changes may manifest as moderate but consistent fold changes across pathway members that would be overlooked when considering individual features in isolation. Third, by focusing on predefined pathways of biological interest, researchers can reduce the multiple testing burden inherent in omics-scale analyses while increasing the biological interpretability of results.

The Pathway Volcano Tool: An Implemented Solution

The Pathway Volcano tool represents a concrete implementation of this framework, developed as an R Shiny application that addresses the visualization challenges of complex omics datasets [35]. This software utilizes the Reactome API to select specific pathways and then filters volcano plots to display only data associated with those pathways, thereby revealing significant features in otherwise crowded sections of the plot [35].

Table 2: Pathway Volcano Technical Specifications and Requirements

Component	Specification	Purpose/Function
Development Environment	R version 4.3.3 with R Studio version 2024.09.1 [35]	Provides the computational foundation for the tool's implementation
Core Packages	ggplot2, plotly, shiny, dplyr [35]	Enable visualization, interactivity, and data manipulation capabilities
Pathway Data Access	ReactomeContentService4R Bioconductor package [35]	Facilitates programmatic access to Reactome pathway knowledgebase
Visualization Output	Interactive volcano plots with pathway-filtered data [35]	Allows exploration of specific biological processes without visual clutter
Data Export Capabilities	PNG files and tables with pathway-associated data [35]	Enables documentation and further analysis of filtered results

The tool's architecture follows a modular design that separates data processing, pathway querying, and visualization components. This design allows researchers to interactively select pathways of interest through a responsive interface, after which the underlying code filters the differential expression dataset to include only genes or proteins associated with the selected pathway. The resulting visualization maintains the familiar volcano plot structure but focuses exclusively on features relevant to the biological process of interest, effectively decluttering the display while highlighting potentially obscured significant features [35].

Practical Implementation: Workflows and Protocols

Experimental Workflow for Pathway-Guided Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the complete analytical workflow from raw omics data to pathway-specific volcano plots, highlighting the critical steps where pathway-based filtering enhances conventional approaches:

Step-by-Step Protocol for Pathway-Based Volcano Plot Generation

Data Preparation and Differential Expression Analysis

The foundation of effective pathway-guided visualization begins with robust data preprocessing and differential expression analysis. For RNA-sequencing data, this typically involves:

• Quality Control and Normalization: Filter low-quality cells or features based on established thresholds (e.g., mitochondrial content <25% and features >500 for single-cell data) [56]. Normalize using appropriate methods such as LogNormalize with a scale factor of 10,000 [56].
• Differential Expression Testing: Perform statistical testing between experimental conditions using established methods. For example, using the FindMarkers() function in Seurat for single-cell data with thresholds of adjusted p-value < 0.05 and |log2FC| > 1 [56].
• Results Compilation: Create a comprehensive results table containing at minimum: feature identifiers, raw p-values, adjusted p-values (FDR), log2 fold changes, and gene symbols [2].

Pathway Selection and Data Filtering

Once differential expression results are prepared, implement pathway-based filtering:

• Pathway Database Access: Utilize the ReactomeContentService4R Bioconductor package to access current pathway annotations [35]. Alternative pathway databases such as KEGG or GO may also be incorporated depending on research focus.
• Interactive Pathway Selection: Implement a user interface for pathway selection based on biological relevance to the research question. The Pathway Volcano tool provides a responsive Shiny interface for this purpose [35].
• Data Subsetting: Filter the complete differential expression results to include only features associated with the selected pathway(s). This typically reduces the dataset from thousands of features to a focused subset of tens or hundreds of features.

Visualization and Interpretation

Generate and interpret the pathway-specific volcano plots:

• Customized Visualization: Create volcano plots using standard plotting libraries (e.g., ggplot2) with the pathway-filtered data. Implement consistent significance thresholds (e.g., FDR < 0.01 and logFC threshold of 0.58) [2] to maintain comparability with full dataset visualizations.
• Interactive Exploration: Utilize interactive features such as hover tooltips, click-based selection, and zoom functionality to explore individual features within the pathway context [35].
• Biological Context Integration: Interpret results in the context of pathway biology, noting coordinated changes across multiple pathway components that might indicate pathway activation or repression.

Research Reagent Solutions for Omics Data Visualization

Table 3: Essential Computational Tools for Pathway-Guided Visualization

Tool/Resource	Type	Primary Function	Application Context
Pathway Volcano	R Shiny Application	Pathway-guided visualization of differential expression data [35]	Interactive exploration of pathway-specific patterns in omics data
Reactome	Pathway Knowledgebase	Provides curated biological pathway information [35]	Source of pathway definitions and gene-pathway associations
Seurat	R Package	Single-cell RNA-seq analysis toolkit [56]	Processing and differential expression analysis of single-cell data
ggplot2	R Visualization Package	Create customizable, publication-quality plots [56]	Generating volcano plots and other data visualizations
MetaboAnalyst	Web-Based Platform	Comprehensive omics data analysis suite [57]	Statistical analysis and visualization of metabolomics data

Case Study Examples and Applications

Single-Cell RNA-Seq Analysis of Müller Glial Cells

A compelling example of pathway-based filtering in practice comes from a single-cell RNA sequencing study investigating autophagy regulation in Müller glial cells [56]. The conventional volcano plot comparing wild-type (WT) and knockout (KO) conditions within Müller glia (Cluster 1) revealed numerous significantly differentially expressed genes, but the density of points in the central region obscured potentially important moderate-effect features.

When the researchers applied pathway-based filtering focusing on inflammatory pathways, they identified coordinated changes in multiple cytokine and chemokine genes that were visually obscured in the full volcano plot. Specific genes of interest including Lcn2, Ccl2, Lif, and Ccl7 exhibited consistent directional changes that suggested pathway-level regulation of inflammatory processes [56]. This pathway-focused approach revealed biologically coherent patterns that were difficult to discern from the conventional visualization.

The implementation followed the protocol outlined in Section 3.2, with differential expression performed using FindMarkers() in Seurat and visualization enhanced through pathway filtering. The resulting pathway-specific volcano plots enabled clear visualization of these coordinated changes, supporting the study's conclusion that autophagy regulates Müller glial cell inflammatory activation [56].

Enhancing Statistical Rigor Through Biological Context

Beyond visualization clarity, pathway-based filtering enhances statistical interpretation by contextualizing individual feature changes within broader biological processes. Features with moderate fold changes that might be dismissed as marginal in a conventional volcano plot gain significance when they participate in a coordinated pathway response. This approach aligns with the growing recognition that biological systems frequently exhibit distributed rather than concentrated effects, with meaningful phenotypic consequences emerging from the aggregate impact of multiple modest changes.

The case study demonstrates how this method facilitates hypothesis generation by revealing patterns of coordinated regulation. Researchers can progress more rapidly from lists of significant features to testable biological models when viewing results through the lens of established pathways and processes.

Implementation Guidelines and Best Practices

Technical Implementation Considerations

Successful implementation of pathway-based filtering requires attention to several technical considerations:

• Data Compatibility: Ensure differential expression results contain the necessary identifiers (e.g., official gene symbols) that can be mapped to pathway databases. Inconsistent identifier mapping represents a common point of failure.
• Pathway Database Selection: Choose pathway resources appropriate for your experimental context. Reactome provides extensive coverage of signaling and metabolic pathways [35], while other resources may offer specialized annotations for specific biological domains.
• Visualization Parameters: Maintain consistent axis scaling and significance thresholds across pathway-specific visualizations to enable comparison between different biological processes.
• Interactive Features: Implement tooltips, zooming, and selection capabilities to enhance exploration of individual features within the pathway context [35].

Interpretation Caveats and Limitations

While pathway-based filtering powerfully addresses the cone problem, researchers should remain mindful of its limitations:

• Pathway Completeness: Pathway databases represent current knowledge, which remains incomplete for many biological processes, potentially excluding relevant features.
• Annotational Bias: Well-studied pathways contain more extensive annotations, potentially creating visualization bias toward established biology over novel discoveries.
• Multiple Testing Considerations: While pathway filtering reduces the multiple testing burden, appropriate statistical correction should still be applied when evaluating significance within pathways.
• Complementary Approaches: Pathway-based filtering should complement rather than replace other visualization strategies, such as focused gene sets or features of particular interest.

Pathway-based filtering represents a significant advancement in visualizing complex omics datasets, directly addressing the "cone" problem that limits the utility of conventional volcano plots for large-scale data. By integrating biological context as a primary filter, this approach enables researchers to transcend the limitations of purely statistical thresholding and reveal coordinated patterns that would otherwise remain obscured in crowded visualizations.

The implementation of this method through tools like Pathway Volcano provides researchers with practical, accessible means to apply this approach to their own datasets [35]. As pathway knowledgebases continue to expand and improve, and as visualization tools become increasingly sophisticated, the power of pathway-guided visualization will continue to grow.

For researchers engaged in omics data analysis and drug development, adopting pathway-based filtering offers a path to more biologically insightful visualizations and more efficient hypothesis generation. By moving beyond the cone problem, this approach supports the extraction of meaningful biological signals from increasingly complex and high-dimensional datasets, ultimately accelerating the translation of omics data into biological understanding and therapeutic advances.

In the analysis of high-throughput omics data, the visualization of results plays a critical role in interpreting biological significance. Among the various visualization techniques, volcano plots have emerged as a standard tool for displaying differentially expressed genes or proteins, simultaneously showing statistical significance (-log10(p-value)) versus magnitude of change (log2 fold change). However, the interpretation of these plots heavily relies on the thresholds set for significance and fold change, which are often arbitrarily determined. Dynamic threshold adjustment addresses this limitation by enabling researchers to interactively explore how varying these thresholds affects the identification of significant features, thereby providing a more intuitive understanding of their data's sensitivity and robustness [40].

The integration of interactive sliders for threshold adjustment represents a significant advancement over static visualization methods. By allowing real-time manipulation of p-value and fold change cut-offs, researchers can immediately observe how the set of significant genes expands or contracts, enabling them to make more informed decisions about biological significance rather than relying solely on statistical thresholds. This approach is particularly valuable in omics research, where the multiple testing problem often necessitates stringent corrections that may obscure biologically relevant but moderately significant changes [2] [40]. Framed within the broader context of visualizing omics data with volcano plots, dynamic threshold adjustment serves as a bridge between statistical rigor and biological interpretation, empowering researchers to explore the continuum of significance rather than being constrained by binary significant/non-significant classifications.

Interactive Tools for Dynamic Threshold Exploration

Specialized Shiny Applications for Omics Data

Several sophisticated tools have been developed specifically to enable interactive threshold adjustment for omics data visualization. OmicsVolcano stands out as a specialized web application designed explicitly for visualizing and exploring high-throughput biological data through a volcano plot interface. This tool allows researchers to interactively highlight genes or proteins associated with specific cellular processes and dynamically adjust significance thresholds without programming expertise. Built on R Shiny with plotly for interactive graphics, OmicsVolcano generates publication-quality scalable vector graphics (SVG) output while providing intuitive controls for real-time data exploration [40]. The application accepts standard input formats containing gene identifiers, descriptions, fold changes, and adjusted p-values, making it compatible with output from common differential expression analysis tools like DESeq2, edgeR, and limma.

Another notable application, DTAShiny, while initially designed for diagnostic test accuracy analysis, employs similar principles of interactive threshold adjustment that can be adapted for omics data exploration. This Shiny-based application features heuristic automatic detection of reference and test variables, real-time threshold adjustment via interactive sliders, and dynamic calculation of performance metrics including sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values [58]. The application's architecture demonstrates the core functionality needed for dynamic threshold exploration: immediate visual feedback as thresholds change, calculation of relevant metrics, and support for various data formats. These applications collectively address the critical need for tools that allow researchers to move beyond static visualizations and engage in exploratory data analysis through direct manipulation of threshold parameters.

Programming-Based Approaches for Customizable Implementations

For researchers requiring greater customization and integration into analytical pipelines, programming-based approaches offer flexible solutions for implementing dynamic threshold adjustment. The EnhancedVolcano R package provides extensive capabilities for creating publication-ready volcano plots with enhanced coloring and labeling options. This package allows users to modify significance thresholds (pCutoff) and fold change thresholds (FCcutoff), with default values set at 10e-6 and |2|, respectively [6]. The package's configuration options enable sophisticated visualizations where users can adjust point size, transparency (alpha), colors, and labeling parameters to create tailored visualizations that highlight specific aspects of their data.

Complementing specialized packages, base R implementations offer fundamental building blocks for custom interactive applications. The basic paradigm involves using the plot(), points(), and subset() functions to create layered visualizations where different significance categories are displayed with distinct colors and symbols [59]. This approach provides the foundation upon which more sophisticated interactive applications can be built, allowing researchers to understand the underlying mechanics of dynamic thresholding before employing more complex tools. For large-scale or high-throughput environments, Galaxy platform implementations provide web-based volcano plot tools with configurable threshold parameters, FDR adjustments, and options for labeling top significant genes or custom gene sets [2], making interactive threshold exploration accessible to researchers without computational expertise or access to specialized programming environments.

Table 1: Comparison of Interactive Tools for Dynamic Threshold Adjustment

Tool Name	Implementation	Key Features	Threshold Parameters	Visualization Output
OmicsVolcano	R Shiny with plotly	Interactive highlighting of biological processes, linked gene information tables	Adjustable p-value and fold change sliders	Publication-quality SVG with interactive HTML
EnhancedVolcano	R/Bioconductor package	Highly customizable coloring, labeling, and styling; multiple attribute visualization	pCutoff, FCcutoff parameters with flexible values	Static publication-ready plots
Galaxy Volcano Plot	Web-based tool	Point-and-click interface, top gene labeling, significance highlighting	FDR threshold, LogFC threshold, top gene selection	Static PNG/SVG plots with R code export
DTAShiny	R Shiny application	Real-time metric calculation, heuristic variable detection, interactive threshold slider	Dynamic cutoff adjustment with confidence intervals	Multiple coordinated visualizations

Methodological Protocols for Threshold Exploration

Experimental Workflow for Interactive Data Exploration

Implementing a comprehensive dynamic threshold adjustment system requires a structured workflow that begins with data preparation and proceeds through interactive visualization to biological interpretation. The first critical step involves preparing the input data in an appropriate format, typically a tabular structure containing gene or protein identifiers, descriptive information, calculated fold changes, and corresponding p-values (both raw and adjusted). For OmicsVolcano, the input format requires five specific columns: identification numbers (IDs), gene symbols, gene descriptions, log fold changes, and adjusted p-values [40]. This standardized input format ensures compatibility across different analysis pipelines and enables the tool to automatically detect and parse the necessary components for visualization.

Following data preparation, the next phase involves configuring the interactive visualization environment. For Shiny-based applications like OmicsVolcano or DTAShiny, this entails launching the application either through a web interface or locally by running the associated R scripts [58] [40]. Once the application is running, researchers can upload their prepared data file, at which point the software automatically detects relevant columns and initializes the interactive controls. The core of the methodology centers around the dynamic adjustment of dual thresholds—one for statistical significance (p-value or FDR) and another for biological relevance (fold change)—using interactive sliders. As these thresholds are adjusted, the visualization immediately updates to highlight features meeting the current criteria, while calculated metrics such as the number of significant features or enrichment statistics are recalculated in real-time [58] [40].

The final phase focuses on biological interpretation through iterative exploration. Researchers can interactively select genes or proteins of interest to view detailed information, highlight predefined gene sets related to specific biological processes, and examine how threshold adjustments affect the composition of significant features. This iterative process of threshold adjustment and visual feedback enables researchers to develop a more nuanced understanding of their data than would be possible with static thresholds. The workflow concludes with the export of publication-quality figures and, in some tools, tables of significant features based on the final selected thresholds [40].

Technical Implementation and Algorithmic Foundations

The technical implementation of dynamic threshold adjustment relies on several computational components working in coordination. The user interface layer, typically built using Shiny framework components (shiny, shinydashboard, shinyWidgets), provides the interactive sliders and controls that capture user input [58] [40]. The visualization layer, often implemented using ggplot2 or plotly, generates the volcano plot representation and updates the display in response to threshold changes. The computational core handles the real-time calculations, including filtering features based on current thresholds, recalculating summary statistics, and for more advanced implementations, computing performance metrics like sensitivity and specificity or enrichment statistics for biological pathways [58].

A critical algorithmic aspect involves efficient handling of large datasets to ensure responsive performance during interactive exploration. This is particularly important for omics datasets that may contain tens of thousands of features. Optimization strategies include pre-calculated indexing of significance values, efficient subsetting algorithms, and progressive rendering techniques for the visualization [40]. For the threshold application itself, the fundamental algorithm involves comparing each feature's fold change and p-value against the current thresholds to assign it to appropriate significance categories (non-significant, statistically significant only, biologically relevant only, or both). These categories are then visualized using distinct colors, shapes, or sizes to create an intuitive representation of the data structure [6] [59].

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Dynamic Threshold Analysis

Reagent/Tool Category	Specific Examples	Function in Analysis	Implementation Considerations
Statistical Computing Environment	R (version 4.0+), RStudio, Bioconductor	Provides foundation for differential expression analysis and visualization	Ensure compatibility of package versions; R 4.0+ recommended for performance
Interactive Application Framework	Shiny, bs4Dash, shinydashboard	Enables creation of web-based interfaces with interactive controls	Requires careful UI design for intuitive threshold adjustment
Visualization Packages	ggplot2, plotly, pROC	Generates static and interactive volcano plots with real-time updates	plotly enables interactive tooltips; ggplot2 ensures publication quality
Data Manipulation Libraries	dplyr, tidyverse	Handles data preprocessing, filtering, and transformation	Essential for efficient real-time data subsetting during threshold adjustment
Specialized Volcano Plot Packages	EnhancedVolcano, VolcanoR	Provides optimized functions for volcano plot creation	Offer advanced labeling and coloring schemes for enhanced interpretation
Differential Expression Tools	DESeq2, edgeR, limma-voom	Generates fold change and p-value inputs for visualization	Ensure proper experimental design and normalization before threshold exploration

Dynamic Threshold Adjustment Workflow: This diagram illustrates the iterative process of exploring omics data through dynamic threshold adjustment, highlighting the continuous feedback loop between parameter modification, visualization updating, and biological interpretation.

Technical Implementation Guide

Application Architecture and Core Components

Building an effective dynamic threshold adjustment system requires a well-designed architecture comprising several integrated components. The foundation typically consists of the R statistical programming language (version 4.0 or higher recommended) with the Shiny web application framework providing the core interactive capabilities [58] [40]. The user interface is constructed using Shiny components such as bs4Dash or shinydashboard to create an organized, responsive layout containing the interactive controls. These controls include sliders for threshold adjustment (p-value/ FDR and fold change), file upload interfaces for data input, and action buttons to trigger calculations or exports. The server-side logic handles the computational workload: processing uploaded data, applying current thresholds to filter and categorize features, generating visualizations, and calculating summary statistics [58].

Data management represents a critical architectural consideration, particularly for handling the large datasets typical in omics research. Efficient implementations employ strategies such as reactive programming to minimize unnecessary recalculations, caching of intermediate results, and optimized data structures for rapid subsetting operations [40]. The visualization component typically leverages ggplot2 for high-quality static graphics or plotly for interactive features like tooltips, zooming, and selection. For specialized visualizations such as ROC curves or precision-recall curves, additional packages like pROC may be incorporated [58]. The architecture must also include export capabilities, enabling researchers to save both the visualization (in formats like SVG or PNG) and tabular data for significant features based on the final selected thresholds, thus facilitating documentation and reporting of analytical decisions made during the interactive exploration process.

Configuration of Interactive Controls and Visual Feedback

The implementation of interactive threshold controls requires careful consideration of both technical functionality and user experience. For p-value thresholds, implementations typically provide a slider control operating on a -log10 transformed scale, allowing researchers to select appropriate stringency levels across multiple orders of magnitude. For fold change thresholds, sliders generally use a linear scale for log2 fold change values, with common default starting points around |0.58| (equivalent to 1.5-fold change) or |1| (equivalent to 2-fold change) [2] [6]. Effective implementations often include additional controls for adjusting visual parameters such as point size, transparency (alpha), color schemes, and labeling options to accommodate different data characteristics and visualization preferences.

Beyond the basic threshold sliders, advanced implementations incorporate supplementary controls that enhance the exploration process. These may include options to label top significant features (either by statistical significance or by fold change), highlight predefined gene sets of biological interest, adjust the number of features displayed to prevent overplotting, and toggle between raw p-values and multiple testing-corrected FDR values [2] [6] [40]. The most effective systems provide immediate visual feedback not only in the primary volcano plot but also through supplementary displays such as interactive tables of significant features, summary statistics counters, and coordinated secondary visualizations like distribution plots or precision-recall curves [58]. This multi-faceted feedback enables researchers to develop a comprehensive understanding of how threshold adjustments affect different aspects of their data's interpretation.

Advanced Applications and Interpretation Framework

Biological Insight Generation Through Iterative Threshold Refinement

Dynamic threshold adjustment facilitates a more nuanced biological interpretation of omics data by enabling researchers to move beyond rigid statistical cutoffs and explore the continuum of significance. This approach proves particularly valuable when investigating biological processes characterized by coordinated moderate changes across multiple genes, where individually none might reach strict statistical significance after multiple testing correction, but collectively they represent meaningful biological signals [40]. By interactively adjusting thresholds, researchers can identify these patterns and determine threshold ranges where biologically coherent gene sets emerge as significant. This exploratory process often reveals threshold "sweet spots" where the number and composition of significant features stabilize, providing more robust biological insights than would be obtained from arbitrary fixed thresholds.

The interactive nature of dynamic threshold adjustment also supports the investigation of specialized biological hypotheses. For instance, researchers can explore threshold settings that optimize the identification of features associated with specific cellular compartments, molecular functions, or predefined gene sets [40]. In educational contexts, dynamically demonstrating how threshold adjustments affect the trade-off between false discoveries and missed findings helps trainees develop intuition about statistical concepts in a concrete, visual context [58]. For method development and comparison, the approach enables researchers to visualize how different normalization strategies or statistical methods affect the distribution of significance and fold changes, providing immediate visual feedback on analytical decisions. These advanced applications highlight how interactive threshold exploration serves not merely as a visualization convenience but as a fundamental tool for biological discovery in omics research.

Analytical Considerations for Robust Data Interpretation

While dynamic threshold adjustment enhances exploratory data analysis, responsible application requires attention to several analytical considerations to ensure robust biological interpretation. First, researchers must remain cognizant of the multiple testing problem—interactively adjusting thresholds without correction for the implicit multiple comparisons can increase false discovery rates. Appropriate use of FDR-adjusted values as the basis for thresholding, rather than raw p-values, provides some protection against this issue, but the exploratory nature of the process still warrants validation of key findings on independent datasets [2] [40]. Second, the interpretation of fold change thresholds should consider the biological context and technical precision of the measurement platform, as the same absolute fold change may have different biological implications in different systems or with different technologies.

The visualization itself also requires careful interpretation, particularly regarding the relationship between statistical significance and biological magnitude. Features with large fold changes but marginal statistical significance (typically appearing in the upper left or right portions of the plot) may represent promising but noisy biological signals worthy of further investigation, while features with high statistical significance but small fold changes (appearing near the top center) may represent highly precise measurements of biologically subtle effects [2] [59]. Dynamic threshold adjustment makes these relationships particularly apparent, allowing researchers to identify and investigate features in these different regions of the significance-magnitude landscape. Finally, researchers should document the threshold exploration process itself, noting how different threshold settings affected their biological interpretations, as this provides valuable context for understanding the robustness of their conclusions and facilitates transparent reporting of analytical decisions in publications and supplementary materials.

Volcano plots are a fundamental visualization tool in omics data analysis, providing a powerful means to simultaneously represent statistical significance and magnitude of change in high-throughput biological experiments. These scatter plots display the -log₁₀ (p-value) against the log₂ (fold change), allowing researchers to quickly identify biologically meaningful patterns in large datasets, such as those from genomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics studies. The characteristic "volcano" shape emerges as statistically significant features with large fold changes rise prominently against a background of non-significant data points. Within the context of omics research, particularly in pharmaceutical development, the ability to generate publication-quality visualizations and access the underlying data is crucial for validating findings, supporting regulatory submissions, and facilitating scientific discovery.

Key Components of a Volcano Plot

Structural Elements and Interpretation

A properly constructed volcano plot integrates multiple statistical and visual elements to facilitate data interpretation. The x-axis represents the log₂ fold change (log₂FC), which quantifies the magnitude of difference in gene or protein expression between experimental conditions. The y-axis displays the -log₁₀ (p-value), transforming raw p-values to emphasize statistically significant results. Threshold lines include vertical lines indicating minimum fold change cutoffs (typically ±1.5 to ±2.0) and a horizontal line representing the statistical significance threshold (commonly p < 0.05 or a multiple testing-adjusted equivalent). Data points are typically colored to distinguish between significantly upregulated features (positive log₂FC), significantly downregulated features (negative log₂FC), and non-significant features, creating an intuitive visual summary of the differential expression analysis.

Statistical Foundations

The statistical rigor behind volcano plots stems from their incorporation of both fold change and statistical testing. The fold change threshold ensures biological relevance, while the p-value threshold addresses statistical significance. In omics applications where thousands of features are tested simultaneously, adjusted p-values (e.g., False Discovery Rate or FDR) are often used instead of raw p-values to correct for multiple testing [60]. The transformation to -log₁₀ (p-value) means that a p-value of 0.01 corresponds to 2 on the y-axis, 0.001 to 3, and so forth, making highly significant results visually prominent.

Experimental Protocols for Volcano Plot Generation

Data Preparation Workflow

The generation of a volcano plot begins with proper experimental design and data processing. For RNA-seq data, this typically involves: (1) read alignment to a reference genome or transcriptome, (2) quantification of gene or transcript abundances, (3) normalization to account for technical variability, and (4) differential expression analysis using specialized statistical methods. Tools such as DESeq2, edgeR, or limma are commonly employed for these analyses [6]. The output includes three essential components for each feature: a logâ‚‚ fold change value, a raw p-value, and an adjusted p-value. These results are typically structured in a tabular format with feature identifiers (e.g., gene symbols) as rows and the statistical metrics as columns.

Differential Expression Analysis Protocol

A standardized protocol for differential expression analysis should be followed to ensure reproducible volcano plots. Using the DESeq2 package in R as an example [6]:

• Data Input: Create a DESeqDataSet object from count data and experimental design metadata
• Normalization: Apply the median of ratios method to account for sequencing depth and RNA composition
• Statistical Testing: Perform the differential expression analysis using the DESeq() function
• Results Extraction: Extract results with shrunken logâ‚‚ fold changes using the lfcShrink() function to improve accuracy
• Results Formatting: Create a results data frame containing gene identifiers, logâ‚‚ fold changes, p-values, and adjusted p-values

This protocol generates the essential data structure required for volcano plot construction, with proper statistical handling of the high-dimensional omics data.

Research Reagent Solutions for Omics Data Visualization

Table 1: Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools for Volcano Plot Generation

Item	Function	Application Context
DESeq2	Differential gene expression analysis	Identifies statistically significant genes in RNA-seq data [6]
EnhancedVolcano R Package	Specialized volcano plot generation	Creates publication-ready volcano plots with enhanced labeling [6]
ggplot2 R Package	Flexible data visualization	Provides foundational plotting capabilities for custom volcano plots [9]
ggrepel R Package	Intelligent label positioning	Prevents overlapping labels for significant features in volcano plots [9]
Response Screening (JMP)	Multiple comparison analysis	Calculates p-values and mean differences for process screening [61]
Microarray Data	Gene expression measurement	Input data for differential expression analysis (e.g., Affymetrix arrays) [44]
RNA-seq Count Data	Transcript abundance quantification	Raw input for differential expression analysis (e.g., RSV virus study) [62]

Technical Implementation Across Platforms

R-based Implementation with EnhancedVolcano

The EnhancedVolcano package [6] provides highly configurable functionality for creating publication-ready volcano plots. The basic implementation requires a results data frame, specification of the x (log2FC) and y (p-value) columns, and feature labels:

Advanced customization options include modification of point colors, shapes, sizes, and transparency; adjustment of cutoff lines and addition of extra threshold lines; optimization of legend position and text; and addition of connectors to maximize label placement without overcrowding.

Custom ggplot2 Implementation

For maximum flexibility, researchers can create volcano plots using ggplot2 directly [9]. This approach involves:

• Creating a differential expression status column
• Establishing basic plot geometry with thresholds
• Customizing aesthetics and themes
• Adding intelligent labels with ggrepel

MATLAB Implementation

For MATLAB users, the Bioinformatics Toolbox provides the mavolcanoplot function [44] specifically designed for creating significance versus gene expression ratio scatter plots from microarray data:

The function returns a SigStructure containing information for statistically significant and differentially expressed genes, sorted by p-value, which can be exported for further analysis.

JMP Implementation

In JMP, volcano plots can be generated through the Response Screening platform [61]:

• Access Process Screening (Analyze > Modeling > Process Screening)
• Assign continuous measures as Y Responses and categorical factors as X
• Run analysis and select "Save Compare Means" from the platform menu
• Join resulting tables on the Y column to combine difference and p-value data
• Use Graph Builder with Difference on x-axis and FDR LogWorth on y-axis

This approach provides an interactive environment with built-in statistical calculations and visualization options.

High-Resolution PNG Export Methodologies

R Export Workflow

Generating high-resolution PNG files in R requires careful attention to device parameters and resolution settings. The following workflow ensures publication-quality output:

For ggplot2-based plots, the ggsave() function provides a streamlined interface:

MATLAB Export Protocol

In MATLAB, high-resolution exports can be achieved through figure properties and export functions [44]:

JMP Export Approach

JMP provides multiple options for exporting volcano plots [61]:

• Right-click on the Graph Builder output and select "Save Picture"
• Use File > Save As to export the entire journal
• Copy and paste into other applications while maintaining resolution

For highest quality, adjust the journal preferences to increase DPI settings before export.

Underlying Data Table Extraction

Structured Data Export Protocols

The utility of volcano plots extends beyond visualization to include comprehensive data export for further analysis, reporting, and supplementary materials.

Table 2: Data Export Structures from Various Platforms

Platform	Export Method	Data Structure
R/EnhancedVolcano	Custom extraction from results object	Data frame with: GeneID, log2FC, pvalue, padj, significance flag [6]
ggplot2	Source data frame with significance columns	Data frame with: GeneID, log2FC, pvalue, diffexpressed, custom_labels [9]
MATLAB	SigStructure output from mavolcanoplot	Structure with: Name, PCutoff, FCThreshold, GeneLabels, PValues, FoldChanges [44]
JMP	Column join of Compare Means and PValue tables	Table with: Y Column, Difference, LogWorth, FDR LogWorth [61]

R Data Export Implementation

In R, the complete dataset used for volcano plot generation, including significance calls, can be exported for further analysis:

MATLAB Data Export Method

In MATLAB, the SigStructure output from mavolcanoplot contains comprehensively annotated significant features [44]:

JMP Data Export Protocol

JMP enables data export through table manipulation and scripting [61]:

• Perform column join between Compare Means and PValue tables
• Add calculated columns for significance flags based on Difference and FDR LogWorth
• Use Tables > Export to save the combined data structure
• Alternatively, use JSL scripting to automate the export process

Integrated Data Visualization and Export Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the complete workflow from raw data to high-resolution visualization and data export, incorporating the key steps and decision points discussed throughout this guide:

Advanced Applications in Pharmaceutical Development

In drug development workflows, volcano plots serve critical functions in target identification, biomarker discovery, and mechanism of action studies. The integration of high-resolution exports and underlying data tables supports regulatory submissions by providing traceable analytical pathways from raw data to visual interpretation. Furthermore, the application of standardized color palettes (such as the Google-inspired palette: #4285F4, #EA4335, #FBBC05, #34A853, #FFFFFF, #F1F3F4, #202124, #5F6368) [63] [64] ensures visual consistency across organizational reporting structures. Through implementation of the methodologies detailed in this technical guide, research scientists can enhance the rigor, reproducibility, and communicative power of their omics data visualizations throughout the drug development pipeline.

Beyond the Basics: Integrating Volcano Plots in Multi-Omics and Drug Discovery

In omics research, robust data interpretation requires integrating multiple complementary visualization techniques to move beyond single-method limitations. This technical guide details a synergistic methodology employing volcano plots, heatmaps, and Venn diagrams to triangulate biological findings across transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic datasets. We demonstrate how this multi-faceted approach enhances biomarker discovery, validates pathway alterations, and strengthens scientific conclusions through systematic cross-verification. The protocol provides researchers and drug development professionals with standardized workflows, implementation tools, and interpretive frameworks for maximizing insights from complex omics data within a cohesive visualization strategy.

Omics technologies generate complex, high-dimensional datasets that no single visualization technique can fully capture. While volcano plots efficiently identify statistically significant changes by plotting p-values against magnitude of change [2], heatmaps reveal expression patterns and sample clustering relationships [65], and Venn diagrams quantify overlaps and unique elements across multiple experimental conditions [66]. When used in isolation, each method presents limitations: volcano plots lack temporal or co-expression context, heatmaps may overlook statistical significance, and Venn diagrams show only presence/absence without quantitative dynamics [66] [67].

Integrating these three visualization types creates a powerful corroborative framework that enables researchers to:

• Verify consistency of significant hits across multiple visualization approaches
• Contextualize findings from molecular to systems-level perspectives
• Minimize interpretation artifacts inherent in single-method analyses
• Generate robust hypotheses for downstream validation and drug target identification

This guide establishes standardized protocols for employing these visualizations as complementary rather than alternative approaches, with emphasis on their synergistic application in multi-omics studies.

Individual Methodologies: Technical Foundations

Volcano Plots: Identifying Significant Changes

Volcano plots provide a compact visualization that displays statistical significance versus magnitude of change, enabling rapid identification of biologically meaningful alterations in omics datasets [2].

Experimental Protocol:

• Input Requirements: Differential expression results containing gene/protein/metabolite identifiers, raw p-values, adjusted p-values (FDR), and log2 fold changes [2]
• Axis Configuration:
  • X-axis: log2(fold change) representing magnitude of change
  • Y-axis: -log10(p-value) representing statistical significance
• Threshold Establishment:
  • Significance: FDR < 0.01 [2]
  • Magnitude: |logFC| > 0.58 (equivalent to 1.5-fold change) [2]
• Visual Interpretation:
  • Upper-right quadrant: Significantly upregulated elements
  • Upper-left quadrant: Significantly downregulated elements
  • Lower regions: Non-significant elements

Table 1: Volcano Plot Interpretation Guide

Quadrant	Statistical Meaning	Biological Implication
Upper-right	FDR < 0.01, logFC > 0.58	Strong candidate for upregulation
Upper-left	FDR < 0.01, logFC < -0.58	Strong candidate for downregulation
Lower-center	FDR > 0.01	Not statistically significant
Vertical centers		Minimal magnitude changes

Heatmaps: Visualizing Expression Patterns

Heatmaps represent numerical data using a color gradient and are particularly effective for visualizing expression patterns across multiple samples or experimental conditions when combined with clustering dendrograms [65].

Experimental Protocol:

• Data Selection: Select top differentially expressed features or all features passing significance thresholds
• Data Normalization: Apply z-score scaling to enable cross-feature comparison using the formula:
  • Z = (X - μ)/σ where X is value, μ is mean, σ is standard deviation [65]
• Matrix Preparation: Organize data as features (genes/proteins/metabolites) in rows and samples in columns
• Color Mapping:
  • Standardized colormaps: blue-white-red for expression with blue as downregulation, red as upregulation [5]
  • Alternative: yellow-blue colorblind-friendly preset [5]
• Clustering Integration: Apply hierarchical clustering to group similar expression patterns using Euclidean distance and complete linkage

Technical Implementation (ComplexHeatmap in R):

Venn Diagrams: Quantifying Overlaps

Venn diagrams provide intuitive visualization of unique and shared elements across multiple experimental conditions or omics layers, with optimal utility for 2-5 group comparisons [66] [67].

Experimental Protocol:

• Set Definition: Define clear inclusion criteria for each set (e.g., proteins detected in specific conditions)
• Input Preparation:
  • Apply consistent statistical thresholds across all groups
  • Use unified identifier systems (UniProt IDs for proteins, HMDB/KEGG for metabolites) [66]
• Diagram Construction:
  • Each circle represents one dataset/condition
  • Overlapping areas indicate shared elements
  • Non-overlapping areas represent unique elements
• Biological Interpretation:
  • Intersections: Core conserved elements across conditions
  • Unique sections: Condition-specific biomarkers or responses

Advanced Considerations:

• For >5 groups, UpSetR plots provide superior visualization of complex intersections [67]
• Proportional Venn diagrams (Euler diagrams) more accurately represent relative set sizes [68]

Table 2: Venn Diagram Applications in Multi-Omics Research

Application Scenario	Research Question	Interpretation Focus
Multi-condition comparison	Which molecules are consistent across treatments?	Overlapping elements in intersections
Temporal analysis	Which responses are transient vs. sustained?	Unique elements at specific time points
Multi-omics integration	Which pathways show coordinated regulation?	Cross-omics overlaps between data layers
Biomarker discovery	Which molecules are specific to disease state?	Unique elements in case vs. control

Integrated Workflow: Corroborating Evidence Across Visualizations

The true power of omics visualization emerges when these techniques are applied sequentially and iteratively to cross-validate findings and build evidence for biological conclusions.

Sequential Analytical Framework

Case Study: Temporal Metabolomic Response to Exercise

A metabolomics study examining blood metabolite changes after exercise demonstrates this integrated approach [66]:

Volcano Plot Phase: Initial analysis identified 31 metabolites with significant concentration changes (FDR < 0.01, |logFC| > 0.58) across all time points [66].

Heatmap Phase: Unsupervised clustering revealed distinct temporal patterns, with acylcarnitines and free fatty acids showing sustained elevation while other metabolites displayed transient responses [66].

Venn Diagram Phase: Quantitative overlap analysis across early (≤0.5 h), intermediate (>0.5-3 h), and late (>3-24 h) time points confirmed 31 metabolites were consistently altered across all periods, while larger sets showed time-specific regulation [66].

Corroborated Finding: The integration confirmed acylcarnitines and free fatty acids as robust, sustained biomarkers of exercise response, while identifying transient metabolites specific to recovery phases.

Cross-Validation Checkpoints

• Consistency Verification: Ensure features identified as significant in volcano plots show coherent patterns in heatmap clusters
• Specificity Assessment: Use Venn diagrams to distinguish condition-specific responses from general stress responses
• Magnitude Contextualization: Correlate fold-changes from volcano plots with relative expression levels visible in heatmaps
• Biological Plausibility: Integrate pathway context with overlap patterns to prioritize mechanistically meaningful findings

Implementation Tools and Best Practices

Software Toolkit for Integrated Visualization

Table 3: Visualization Tools for Omics Data Analysis

Tool/Platform	Visualization Capabilities	Implementation	Best Use Cases
GraphBio [5]	Volcano plots, heatmaps, Venn diagrams, PCA	Web application (no coding)	Rapid, publication-ready figures
xOmicsShiny [68]	Cross-omics visualization, Venn diagrams, pathway mapping	R Shiny application	Multi-omics integration studies
ComplexHeatmap [65]	Advanced heatmaps with annotations	R/Bioconductor package	Customized, publication-quality heatmaps
Venny/BioVenn [66]	Interactive and proportional Venn diagrams	Web-based tools	Quick overlap analysis for ≤5 groups
UpSetR [67]	Matrix-based set visualization	R package	Complex intersections (>5 groups)

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Analytical Resources for Omics Visualization

Resource Type	Specific Examples	Function in Workflow
Identifier Mapping Databases	UniProt IDs, HMDB, KEGG, GlyTouCan	Standardized molecule identification across visualizations [66]
Pathway Databases	WikiPathways, Reactome, KEGG	Biological context for significant findings [68]
Normalization Tools	Total ion current normalization, batch correction	Data preprocessing for comparable visualizations [66]
Statistical Packages	limma, DESeq2, edgeR	Generate differential expression inputs for visualizations [2]

Quality Control and Validation Framework

Data Preprocessing Standards:

• Apply consistent normalization across all datasets (e.g., total ion current normalization in proteomics) [66]
• Implement uniform statistical filtering (FDR < 0.05, biologically relevant fold changes) [66]
• Establish reproducible thresholds prior to visualization to minimize bias

Interpretation Safeguards:

• Avoid overinterpreting marginal overlaps in Venn diagrams without statistical support [66]
• Validate heatmap clusters with statistical measures of cluster robustness
• Consider quantitative differences for molecules in Venn diagram intersections that may show differential regulation despite being "present" across conditions [66]

Scalability Considerations:

• Limit Venn diagrams to 2-4 groups for interpretability; use UpSetR for complex intersections [67]
• For large feature sets, focus heatmaps on top differentially expressed features or pathway-specific elements
• Employ interactive visualization tools for exploratory analysis of large datasets [68]

The strategic integration of volcano plots, heatmaps, and Venn diagrams establishes a robust framework for corroborating omics findings that transcends the limitations of individual visualization techniques. This tripartite approach enables researchers to move from identifying statistically significant changes to understanding expression patterns and quantifying conservation across conditions, ultimately generating more reliable biological insights. As omics technologies continue to evolve toward multi-modal integration, this complementary visualization strategy will become increasingly essential for validating discoveries in basic research and translating findings into therapeutic applications.

The provided workflow, implementation tools, and validation checkpoints offer researchers a standardized yet flexible approach to visual data triangulation, supporting the rigorous interpretation demands of modern systems biology and precision medicine initiatives.

High-throughput omics technologies enable the simultaneous measurement of thousands of biological molecules, generating vast datasets that compare phenotypes such as disease versus healthy states [69]. The initial analysis typically identifies differentially expressed (DE) genes, proteins, or metabolites using statistical measures like p-values and fold changes [8]. While these lists provide valuable information about individual molecular changes, they fall short of explaining the complex biological mechanisms underlying the observed phenotypes [69]. Pathway impact analysis addresses this limitation by bridging the gap between statistical results and biological interpretation, moving beyond individual molecules to understand systemic changes in biological systems.

This analytical approach leverages curated pathway databases that capture established knowledge about biological processes, including interactions and relationships between molecular components [70]. By evaluating how experimental data maps onto these known pathways, researchers can identify which biological processes are most significantly impacted in their specific experimental condition [69]. This methodology has become indispensable for interpreting omics data, with more than 70 different pathway analysis methods developed to date [69]. The core value proposition lies in its ability to transform statistical outputs into biologically meaningful insights about mechanism, context, and potential therapeutic targets.

Foundational Concepts: From Volcano Plots to Biological Pathways

Volcano Plots as a Starting Point

The volcano plot serves as a fundamental visualization tool in initial omics data analysis, providing a compact representation of differential analysis results across thousands of measurements [8]. This scatter plot displays both the magnitude and statistical evidence of changes between experimental conditions:

• X-axis (logâ‚‚ fold change): Represents the magnitude and direction of change, where values farther from zero indicate larger effect sizes [8]. Points to the right represent upregulated molecules, while points to the left represent downregulated molecules.
• Y-axis (−log₁₀ p-value): Represents statistical significance, with higher values indicating stronger evidence against the null hypothesis [8]. This transformation makes small p-values appear as large positive values.

The following Graphviz diagram illustrates the conceptual workflow from raw omics data to pathway-level insights:

Visualization 1: From Omics Data to Biological Interpretation

In practice, researchers apply thresholds to both dimensions to identify the most promising candidates. Common cutoffs include |log₂FC| ≥ 1 (approximately 2-fold change) and q-value < 0.05 (false discovery rate adjusted) [8]. Features meeting these criteria appear in the upper-left (significantly downregulated) or upper-right (significantly upregulated) regions of the plot and represent potential candidates for further pathway analysis.

Pathway Databases and Standardization

Pathway impact analysis depends on curated biological pathways from databases that capture existing knowledge about biological processes. These resources vary in scope, focus, and curation approach:

Table 1: Major Pathway Databases for Impact Analysis

Database	Focus & Specialty	Data Format	Key Features
KEGG [70]	Metabolic & signaling pathways	KGML	Extensive coverage of metabolic pathways
Reactome [70]	Human biological processes	BioPAX	Expert-curated, hierarchical organization
WikiPathways [70]	Community-curated pathways	GPML	Collaborative editing, frequent updates
BioCyc [70]	Metabolic pathways	BioPAX	Organism-specific database collection
PANTHER [70]	Protein families & pathways	Multiple	Evolutionary perspective

A critical aspect of pathway modeling is the use of standardized naming conventions and identifiers for molecular entities [70]. Consistent identifiers (e.g., UniProt for proteins, Ensembl for genes, ChEBI for chemicals) enable computational processing and integration across different resources [70]. This standardization ensures that molecular entities from experimental data can be accurately mapped to their counterparts in pathway databases, forming the foundation for robust impact analysis.

Methodological Approaches to Pathway Impact Analysis

Non-Topology-Based Methods

Non-topology-based (non-TB) methods, also known as gene set analysis methods, represent the first generation of pathway analysis approaches [69]. These methods treat pathways as simple sets of genes without considering the complex interactions between components:

• Over-Representation Analysis (ORA): This approach takes a list of differentially expressed genes as input and identifies pathways where these genes are statistically overrepresented using methods like Fisher's exact test or hypergeometric tests [69]. Tools implementing ORA include Onto-Express, GeneMAPP, DAVID, and WebGestalt [69]. While straightforward to implement and interpret, ORA depends heavily on the arbitrary thresholds used to define differential expression and ignores correlations between genes in the same pathway [69].

• Functional Class Scoring (FCS): These methods address limitations of ORA by considering all measured genes rather than just those passing significance thresholds [69]. FCS approaches detect coordinated changes in sets of functionally related genes by combining moderate but consistent expression changes across pathway members [69]. Popular implementations include GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis), GSA, and PADOG [69]. These methods are generally more sensitive to subtle but coordinated changes and less dependent on arbitrary significance cutoffs.

Topology-Based Methods

Topology-based (TB) methods incorporate information about the structural relationships between pathway components, including the positions and roles of genes within pathways, directions of signals, and types of molecular interactions [69]. This approach recognizes that pathways are more than mere lists of genes—they represent complex networks of interactions that determine biological function:

• Impact Analysis: This method combines evidence from classical enrichment analysis with measures of actual pathway perturbation [71]. It considers factors such as the position of DE genes in pathways, the direction of change, and the type of interactions between pathway members [71] [69].

• Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis (SPIA): This novel method combines two independent types of evidence: the over-representation of DE genes in a pathway and the measured perturbation of that pathway under the given condition [71]. A bootstrap procedure assesses the significance of the observed total pathway perturbation, producing a global pathway significance P-value that combines both enrichment and perturbation evidence [71].

The following Graphviz diagram illustrates how topology-based methods incorporate pathway structure into their analysis:

Visualization 2: Topology vs. Non-Topology Based Methods

Comparative Performance of Pathway Analysis Methods

A comprehensive assessment of 13 widely used pathway analysis methods using 2,601 samples from 75 human disease datasets and 121 samples from 11 knockout mouse datasets revealed important performance characteristics [69]:

Table 2: Performance Comparison of Pathway Analysis Method Categories

Method Category	Strengths	Limitations	Representative Tools
Non-Topology-Based	Fast computation; Easy interpretation; Well-established	Ignores pathway structure; May miss subtle changes; Cutoff-dependent	Fisher's Exact Test [69], GSEA [69], GSA [69], PADOG [69]
Topology-Based	Incorporates biological context; More biologically plausible; Can detect compensatory changes	Computationally intensive; Dependent on pathway quality; Complex interpretation	SPIA [71] [69], ROntoTools [69], PathNet [69], CePa [69]

The comparative study found that topology-based methods generally outperform non-topology-based approaches in identifying biologically relevant pathways, which is somewhat expected since TB methods incorporate more biological context [69]. However, the study also revealed that most methods demonstrate some bias in their results, producing non-uniform p-value distributions under the null hypothesis [69]. This highlights the importance of method selection based on specific research goals and careful interpretation of results.

Implementing Pathway Impact Analysis: A Practical Guide

Experimental Design and Quality Control

Proper experimental design and quality control are prerequisites for meaningful pathway impact analysis. Inadequate normalization, unaddressed batch effects, or small sample sizes can distort both fold change estimates and significance measures, leading to misleading pathway results [8].

Essential QC steps before pathway analysis:

• Assess signal drift and apply appropriate normalization [8]
• Evaluate and correct for batch effects using methods like ComBat or RUV [8]
• Implement a consistent imputation strategy for missing values [8]
• Pre-register statistical cutoffs and analysis models to avoid threshold hacking [8]
• Confirm false discovery rate control and report both q-values and effect sizes [8]

Sample size considerations: While there is no one-size-fits-all recommendation, designs with adequate replicates and proper batch control yield more stable effect sizes and q-values [8]. Small sample sizes inflate variance and destabilize statistical estimates, compromising downstream pathway analysis [8].

Integrating Volcano Plots with Pathway Analysis

The transition from volcano plot visualization to pathway impact analysis follows a logical workflow:

• Identify significant features from the volcano plot using predefined thresholds for fold change and statistical significance [8]
• Map these features to pathway databases using standardized identifiers [70]
• Select appropriate analysis method based on research question and data characteristics [69]
• Interpret results in biological context, considering both statistical and biological significance [72]

The following Graphviz diagram illustrates the SPIA method, which combines traditional enrichment with pathway perturbation:

Visualization 3: Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis (SPIA) Workflow

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Pathway Impact Analysis

Resource Category	Specific Tools & Databases	Function & Application
Pathway Databases	KEGG [70], Reactome [70], WikiPathways [70]	Curated biological pathways for mapping omics data
Analysis Tools	SPIA [71], GSEA [69], ROntoTools [69]	Implement statistical methods for pathway impact analysis
Identifier Mapping	UniProt [70], Ensembl [70], ChEBI [70]	Standardized molecular identifiers for cross-referencing
Visualization	PathVisio [70], Cytoscape [70], Plotly [43]	Create publication-quality pathway diagrams and volcano plots
Programming Environments	R/Bioconductor, Python	Flexible computational environments for custom analysis

Interpreting Results: Connecting Statistical Output to Biological Meaning

Distinguishing Statistical vs. Biological Significance

A crucial aspect of pathway impact analysis involves understanding the relationship between statistical significance and biological significance [72]. These are related but distinct concepts:

• Statistical significance indicates that an observed effect is unlikely to have occurred by chance, typically defined by p-values or q-values below a predetermined threshold (e.g., p < 0.05) [72].
• Biological significance refers to whether the statistically identified pathway has meaningful implications for understanding the biological system under study [72].

The choice of statistical threshold involves balancing sensitivity and specificity. More stringent criteria (e.g., p < 0.001) decrease false positives but may exclude biologically relevant pathways [72]. For example, in a pituitary adenoma study, using p < 0.001 instead of p < 0.05 would have reduced 12 significant canonical pathways to just 1, potentially eliminating biologically meaningful findings [72].

Advanced Applications in Drug Development and Biomarker Discovery

Pathway impact analysis enables several advanced applications in pharmaceutical research and development:

• Drug mechanism elucidation: In a proteomics study of kinase inhibitor treatment, volcano plots revealed ~30 significantly impacted phosphoproteins, while pathway analysis showed enrichment in MAPK signaling with compensatory PI3K activity, providing insights into both primary and adaptive response mechanisms [8].
• Biomarker discovery: In metabolomics profiling of disease versus healthy states, pathway impact analysis identified coordinated changes in bile acid conjugates (downregulated) and acylcarnitines (upregulated), suggesting a three-metabolite panel that achieved cross-validated AUC ≈ 0.87 for disease classification [8].
• Toxicology and safety assessment: Pathway analysis can identify off-target effects and potential toxicity mechanisms by revealing unintended impacts on biological processes beyond the primary drug target.

Common Pitfalls and Best Practices

Several common pitfalls can compromise pathway impact analysis:

• Inadequate sample sizes: Small-n designs produce unstable variance estimates and unreliable q-values [8]. Use power calculations where possible and include adequate biological replicates.
• Unaddressed batch effects: Technical artifacts can create spurious pathway signals [8]. Implement batch correction methods and randomize processing order.
• Threshold hacking: Altering statistical cutoffs post-hoc to highlight preferred pathways undermines reproducibility [8]. Pre-register analysis plans and thresholds.
• Over-reliance on p-values: Statistical significance alone does not guarantee biological importance [72]. Consider effect sizes, experimental context, and prior biological knowledge.
• Ignoring pathway quality: Not all curated pathways have equal supporting evidence [70]. Consider pathway source, curation quality, and recency when interpreting results.

Pathway impact analysis continues to evolve with several promising developments on the horizon. Multi-omics integration approaches combine data from genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to provide more comprehensive views of biological systems [72]. Single-cell pathway analysis methods are emerging to address the unique characteristics of single-cell omics data [73]. Dynamic pathway modeling techniques aim to capture temporal changes in pathway activity across experimental conditions or disease progression.

The field is also addressing current limitations through improved pathway curation practices. Community initiatives are developing standards for creating reusable, computable pathway models with proper annotation, scope definition, and dissemination [70]. The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles guide these efforts to enhance pathway quality and utility [70].

In conclusion, pathway impact analysis provides an essential bridge between statistical patterns in omics data and biologically meaningful mechanisms. By moving beyond individual molecules to consider systems-level changes, this approach helps researchers transform quantitative measurements from volcano plots into actionable biological insights. As methods continue to improve and biological knowledge expands, pathway impact analysis will remain a cornerstone of omics data interpretation, particularly in therapeutic development where understanding mechanism is critical for success.

Multi-omics integration represents a paradigm shift in systems biology, moving beyond single-layer analysis to provide a comprehensive view of complex biological systems. Transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics each capture unique insights into different layers of biological organization: transcriptomics measures RNA expression levels as an indirect measure of DNA activity; proteomics identifies and quantifies proteins and enzymes that execute cellular functions; and metabolomics comprehensively analyzes small molecules (≤1.5 kDa) that serve as both regulators and end products of metabolic processes [74]. Together, these technologies offer a streamlined view of biological processes from genetic instruction to functional phenotype.

The integration of these disparate data types has become increasingly important in bioinformatics research because analyzing each omics dataset separately fails to capture the intricate interactions between different molecular entities, potentially missing critical biological insights [74] [75]. A holistic strategy integrating data from multi-omics platforms is imperative for a comprehensive understanding of key pathological processes and molecular mechanisms underlying health and disease [75]. This technical guide explores the core methods, visualization techniques, and practical implementations for correlating transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic signals, with particular emphasis on volcano plots as essential tools for identifying significant changes in multi-omics datasets.

Methods for Integrating Multi-Omics Data

Integrative analyses of multiple omics datasets require specialized approaches that can handle the heterogeneous nature of the data while revealing biologically meaningful relationships. These methods can be broadly categorized into three major approaches, each with distinct strengths and applications [74].

Combined Omics Integration Approaches

Combined omics integration approaches attempt to explain what occurs within each type of omics data in an integrated manner while generating independent datasets. These methods typically involve simultaneous analysis of multiple omics layers to identify coordinated patterns across molecular levels. Pathway enrichment analysis is a prominent example, where omics data are mapped onto biological pathways to identify systems-level alterations [74] [76]. For metabolomics data specifically, pathway enrichment analysis can reveal enriched pathways in databases like KEGG or HumanCyc, helping to determine significant metabolites that may play vital roles in corresponding biological pathways [76].

Correlation-Based Integration Strategies

Correlation-based strategies apply statistical correlations between different types of generated omics data to uncover and quantify relationships between various molecular components, creating data structures such as networks to represent these relationships visually and analytically [74]. These methods include:

• Gene co-expression analysis integrated with metabolomics data: Identifies gene modules with similar expression patterns that may participate in the same biological pathways, then links these modules to metabolites from metabolomics data to identify co-regulated metabolic pathways [74].
• Gene-metabolite networks: Visualizes interactions between genes and metabolites in a biological system using correlation analysis (e.g., Pearson correlation coefficient) and network visualization software like Cytoscape [74].
• Similarity Network Fusion: Builds similarity networks for each omics data type separately, then merges all networks while highlighting edges with high associations in each omics network [74].
• Enzyme and metabolite-based networks: Identifies networks of protein-metabolite or enzyme-metabolite interactions using genome-scale models or pathway databases [74].

The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) is widely used as a measure of correlation in systems biology applications, with tools like 3Omics incorporating the "corr" function from R to compute PCCs for generating correlation networks [76].

Machine Learning Integrative Approaches

Machine learning strategies utilize one or more types of omics data, potentially incorporating additional information inherent to these datasets, to comprehensively understand responses at classification and regression levels, particularly in relation to diseases [74]. These approaches can identify complex, non-linear patterns that might be missed by traditional statistical methods and are particularly valuable for predictive modeling and biomarker discovery in complex diseases.

Table 1: Comparison of Multi-Omics Integration Approaches

Integration Approach	Strategy or Method	Key Features	Applicable Omics Data
Combined Omics Integration	Pathway Enrichment Analysis	Maps data to biological pathways; identifies systems-level alterations	Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics
Correlation-Based	Gene-Metabolite Network	PCC analysis; network visualization with Cytoscape	Transcriptomics & Metabolomics
Correlation-Based	Similarity Network Fusion	Creates individual similarity networks merged into final network	Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics
Machine Learning	Classification & Regression	Identifies complex, non-linear patterns; predictive modeling	One or more omics data types

Visualization of Multi-Omics Data

Effective visualization is crucial for interpreting complex multi-omics datasets and communicating findings to diverse audiences. Several specialized visualization techniques have been developed specifically for omics data.

Volcano Plots in Omics Analysis

Volcano plots are a sophisticated data visualization tool used to quickly identify meaningful changes in large omics datasets composed of replicate data [1]. They combine a measure of statistical significance (typically -log10 of p-value) plotted on the y-axis with the magnitude of change (usually log2 fold change) plotted on the x-axis [2] [1]. This enables quick visual identification of features (genes, proteins, metabolites) that display large magnitude changes that are also statistically significant [1].

In practice, volcano plots are generated from differentially expressed results files containing required columns such as raw P values, adjusted P values (FDR), log fold change, and feature labels [2]. Significance thresholds are typically applied for both FDR and log fold change to highlight the most biologically relevant features. For example, in RNA-seq analysis, common thresholds include FDR < 0.01 and absolute log fold change > 0.58 (equivalent to 1.5-fold change) [2].

The characteristic upwards two-arm shape of volcano plots emerges because the x-axis values (log2-fold changes) are generally normally distributed, while the y-axis values (-log10 p-values) tend toward greater significance for fold-changes that deviate more strongly from zero [1]. The upper bound of the data forms a parabolic shape, making highly significant features with large fold changes visually prominent in the upper-left and upper-right quadrants of the plot.

Advanced Visualization Tools

OmicsVolcano

OmicsVolcano is an interactive open-source software tool designed to enable visualization and exploration of high-throughput biological data using a volcano plot interface [40]. Its key advantage is that it requires no programming skills to generate high-quality, presentation-ready images. The tool allows researchers to highlight specific sets of changes or processes interactively, visualize groups of genes and proteins related to specific cellular processes, examine cellular localizations, and generate publication-quality images in scalable vector graphic (SVG) format [40].

Implemented in R using packages including shiny, ggplot2, and plotly, OmicsVolcano accepts input files with five columns: identification numbers (IDs), gene symbols, gene descriptions, log fold changes, and adjusted p values [40]. Unlike standard volcano plot tools, it enables interactive exploration of omics data with immediate visualization of changes, highlighting of primary changes, and examination of cellular processes and localizations.

Three-Way Comparison Visualization

For complex experimental designs involving three conditions or time points, specialized color-coding approaches based on the HSB (hue, saturation, brightness) color model enable intuitive visualization of three-way comparisons [77]. In this approach, the three compared values are assigned specific hue values from the circular hue range (e.g., red, green, and blue) [77]. The resulting hue is calculated according to the distribution of the three compared values:

• When all three values are identical, the resulting color is white
• If two values are identical and one is different, the resulting color corresponds to the hue characteristic of the differing value
• When all three values are different, the color is selected from a gradient between the hues of the two most distant values according to the relative position of the third value [77]

The saturation of the color indicates the extent of differences between values, while brightness can be set to maximum or used to encode additional information [77]. This approach facilitates intuitive overall visualization of three-way comparisons of large datasets, though it should be noted that distributions such as a > b = c and a < b = c produce the same result [77].

3Omics Web Tool

3Omics is a web-based systems biology tool specifically designed for analysis, integration and visualization of human transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic data [76]. It supports multiple analysis types including Transcriptomics-Proteomics-Metabolomics (T-P-M) analysis, Transcriptomics-Proteomics (T-P) analysis, Proteomics-Metabolomics (P-M) analysis, and Transcriptomics-Metabolomics (T-M) analysis [76].

The platform combines five commonly used analyses: correlation networking, coexpression, phenotyping, pathway enrichment, and GO (Gene Ontology) enrichment [76]. When only two of three omics datasets are available, 3Omics supplements missing information by text-mining the PubMed database to generate literature-derived objects and relationships for correlation analysis [76]. All visualization and analysis results are downloadable for further customization, making it a versatile platform for integrated omics analysis.

Table 2: Multi-Omics Visualization Software Comparison

Software Tool	Accessibility	Key Features	Output Formats	Specialization
OmicsVolcano	R-based, open-source	Interactive highlighting; no coding required; cellular localization views	SVG, PNG	Volcano plots with interactive exploration
3Omics	Web-based platform	Correlation networks; pathway enrichment; phenotype mapping; PubMed integration	SVG, SIF, PNG	Human transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic data
Three-Way Comparison Visualization	Algorithmic approach	HSB color model; simultaneous comparison of three conditions	Custom color maps	Three-condition experimental designs

Experimental Protocols and Workflows

Implementing robust experimental protocols is essential for generating high-quality multi-omics data suitable for integration and visualization. The following section outlines key methodologies and workflows for comprehensive multi-omics studies.

Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis Workflow

The following diagram illustrates a generalized workflow for integrated transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic analysis, incorporating key steps from data generation through integration and visualization:

Case Study: Diabetic Ulcer Analysis

A recent integrated transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic analysis of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) provides a illustrative example of a comprehensive multi-omics workflow [75]. The study employed the following experimental methodology:

Sample Collection and Preparation:

• Collected tissue samples from diabetic ulcers and control groups
• Processed samples for transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic analyses

Transcriptomic Analysis:

• Identified 653 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between diabetic ulcers and control groups
• Performed pathway analysis using databases such as KEGG to identify enriched biological pathways
• Key pathways included cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, TNF signaling pathway, and NF-κB signaling pathway

Proteomic Analysis:

• Revealed 464 upregulated and 419 downregulated proteins (differentially expressed proteins, DEPs)
• Pathway analysis indicated representation in diabetic cardiomyopathy, PPAR signaling pathway, and HIF-1 signaling pathway

Metabolomic Analysis:

• Identified 1,304 metabolites, predominantly lipids (32.1%) and organic acids (20.2%)
• Utilized principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to confirm model effectiveness in distinguishing sample groups
• Bioinformatics analysis revealed significant metabolic pathways, particularly amino acid biosynthesis

Data Integration:

• Constructed a compound-reaction-enzyme-gene network by integrating all omics data
• Identified critical molecular signatures associated with DFUs
• Laid groundwork for developing innovative therapeutic strategies

Experimental Validation:

• Utilized a mouse model of diabetic ulcers with healthy male C57BL/6J mice
• Induced diabetes through high-sugar, high-fat diet followed by streptozotocin (STZ) injection
• Created skin ulcer model using sterile biopsy punch
• Monitored wound healing over 7 days with photographic documentation and measurement

This comprehensive approach enabled researchers to move beyond single-omics limitations and identify key targets and mechanisms for diabetic ulcer treatment, demonstrating the power of integrated multi-omics analysis [75].

Protocol for Volcano Plot Generation

The following step-by-step protocol details the generation of volcano plots from omics data, based on established methodologies [2]:

Input Data Preparation:

• Required input: Differentially expressed results file with four essential columns:
  • Raw P values
  • Adjusted P values (FDR)
  • Log fold change values
  • Feature labels (e.g., gene symbols)
• Optional input: File containing specific features of interest to highlight

Volcano Plot Generation using OmicsVolcano or Similar Tools:

• Upload input file containing the required columns
• Set significance thresholds:
  • FDR (adjusted P value): Typically 0.01 or 0.05
  • LogFC threshold: Typically 0.58 (equivalent to 1.5-fold change) or higher
• Select points to label:
  • Option 1: None (no labels)
  • Option 2: Significant (all significant features)
  • Option 3: Top most significant (e.g., top 10 by P value)
  • Option 4: Input from file (specific features of interest)
• Adjust visual parameters as needed:
  • Point size and transparency
  • Color scheme for up-regulated, down-regulated, and non-significant features
  • Label boxes for highlighted features
• Generate plot and export in desired format (SVG recommended for publications)

Interpretation of Results:

• Up-regulated features appear in the upper-right quadrant (positive logFC, high significance)
• Down-regulated features appear in the upper-left quadrant (negative logFC, high significance)
• The most biologically significant features typically reside in the upper extremes of the plot while being significantly displaced from center

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful multi-omics integration requires specialized reagents, materials, and computational tools. The following table details essential components for comprehensive multi-omics studies:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools for Multi-Omics Studies

Category	Item/Reagent	Specification/Function	Application Notes
Biological Materials	C57BL/6J Mice	8-10 weeks old; 30-35g; for diabetic ulcer models	High-sugar, high-fat diet induction followed by STZ injection [75]
Chemical Reagents	Streptozotocin (STZ)	2% solution; 35 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days	Induces diabetes in animal models [75]
Omics Technologies	RNA-seq Platform	High-throughput sequencing for transcriptomics	Identifies differentially expressed genes [75]
Omics Technologies	Mass Spectrometry Platform	Quantitative analysis for proteomics and metabolomics	Identifies proteins and metabolites; CE-TOFMS used for metabolomics [77] [75]
Software Tools	R and RStudio	Statistical computing environment	Required for OmicsVolcano; version 3.6.1 or higher [40]
Software Tools	OmicsVolcano	Interactive volcano plot generation	Uses shiny, ggplot2, plotly packages [40]
Software Tools	3Omics	Web-based multi-omics integration	Perl and PHP scripts; correlation networking, pathway enrichment [76]
Software Tools	Cytoscape	Network visualization and analysis	Visualizes gene-metabolite networks [74]
Database Resources	KEGG/HumanCyc	Pathway databases	Pathway enrichment analysis [76]
Database Resources	PubMed/iHOP	Literature mining	Supplements missing omics data through text-mining [76]

The integration of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data represents a powerful approach for unraveling complex biological systems and disease mechanisms. Each omics layer provides unique insights: transcriptomics captures regulatory information, proteomics reflects functional executers, and metabolomics reveals the ultimate mediators of metabolic processes [74]. Through correlation-based methods, combined integration approaches, and machine learning strategies, researchers can identify novel relationships and patterns that would remain hidden in single-omics analyses [74].

Effective visualization, particularly through volcano plots and specialized tools like OmicsVolcano and 3Omics, enables researchers to quickly identify significant changes and patterns across multiple omics datasets [40] [76] [2]. These tools have made sophisticated multi-omics analyses accessible to researchers without advanced computational backgrounds, accelerating discovery in fields from diabetes research to cancer biology [40] [75].

As multi-omics technologies continue to evolve, the integration and visualization approaches outlined in this technical guide will play an increasingly important role in translating complex molecular data into actionable biological insights and therapeutic strategies. The compound-reaction-enzyme-gene networks constructed through integrated analysis provide a systems-level understanding of biological phenomena, ultimately advancing both basic research and clinical applications [75].

The past three decades have witnessed a dramatic transformation in medicine's approach to disease detection, treatment, and monitoring, largely driven by the rise of biomarkers—measurable biological indicators that provide critical insights into physiological and pathological processes [78]. These tools have become indispensable across the entire healthcare spectrum, particularly in drug development, where they revolutionize clinical trial design, enable patient stratification, allow earlier assessment of drug efficacy, and reduce attrition rates [78]. The emergence of pharmacogenomic biomarkers has further facilitated more precise, personalized therapies, simultaneously reducing adverse effects while improving patient outcomes [78]. Within this context, the accurate visualization and interpretation of complex biological data through tools like volcano plots has become fundamental for prioritizing the most promising biomarkers and drug targets from vast omics datasets.

Biomarkers in drug development are broadly classified into predictive biomarkers, which identify patients most likely to respond to a specific treatment, and prognostic biomarkers, which provide information on disease progression regardless of treatment [78]. Successful examples include HER2 for trastuzumab in breast cancer and EGFR mutations for tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer [78]. The regulatory landscape for biomarker application has evolved alongside these developments, with agencies like the FDA establishing structured pathways such as the Biomarker Qualification Program to validate biomarkers for clinical use [78]. However, the adoption of biomarkers faces challenges in standardization, reproducibility, and regulatory alignment, necessitating robust analytical frameworks for their identification and validation [78].

Technical Foundations of Volcano Plots for Omics Data Visualization

Statistical Principles and Interpretation

Volcano plots serve as a sophisticated data visualization tool in statistical and genomic analyses that illustrate the relationship between the magnitude of change and statistical significance in large datasets [1]. They are constructed by plotting the negative logarithm (base 10) of the p-value on the y-axis, ensuring that data points with lower p-values—indicative of higher statistical significance—are positioned toward the top of the plot [1]. The x-axis represents the logarithm of the fold change between two conditions, allowing for a symmetric representation of both upregulated and downregulated changes relative to the center [1].

This visualization method enables quick identification of genes or proteins that display both large magnitude changes and statistical significance, making them prime candidates for further investigation [1]. The plot characteristically shows an upwards two-arm shape because the x-axis (log2-fold changes) generally follows a normal distribution, while the y-axis (-log10 p-values) tends toward greater significance for fold-changes that deviate more strongly from zero [1]. The upper extremes of the graph that are significantly displaced to the left or right correspond to variables exhibiting substantial fold changes and exceptional statistical significance, representing the most biologically relevant features for target identification [1].

Construction Workflow and Data Processing

The construction of a volcano plot follows a systematic two-step procedure [43]. First, the log2 fold-change (log2FC) is determined by taking the ratio of gene abundance in the treatment group to the control group, followed by a log2 transformation to obtain a normal or near-normal distribution, where values > 0 indicate upregulated genes and values < 0 indicate downregulated genes [43]. Second, an adjusted p-value (or q-value), corrected for multiple comparisons, is used to calculate whether gene expression changes between treatment and control groups are significantly different, followed by a -log10 transformation to obtain the -log10(adjusted p-value) [43].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the complete process from raw data to biological interpretation:

For effective visualization, specific thresholds are applied to highlight the most promising candidates. In a typical RNA-seq analysis, genes are considered significant if they have an FDR < 0.01 and an absolute log fold change of 0.58 (equivalent to a fold-change of 1.5) [2]. These thresholds can be adjusted based on the specific research context and data quality. The resulting plot enables researchers to quickly identify genes like CXCL10, IDO1, RSAD2, CCL2, CCL8, and LAMP3 in immunology studies, which often emerge as top upregulated genes with both statistical significance and substantial fold changes [43].

Experimental Protocols for Biomarker Discovery

Multi-Omics Data Integration and Analysis

Contemporary biomarker discovery relies on integrating multiple omics technologies to provide global insights into cellular function [40]. A representative protocol from a recent study investigating molecular mechanisms in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) demonstrates this comprehensive approach [79]. Researchers retrieved transcriptome sequencing datasets (GSE80178, GSE134431, GSE147890) and single-cell dataset (GSE165816) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database [79]. The analytical workflow included weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify gene modules highly correlated with DFU, followed by immune infiltration analysis using the CIBERSORT algorithm [79].

Differential gene expression selection criteria were set at |log2FC| > 1 with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 [79]. Functional enrichment analysis was then performed using the DAVID online platform for Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analyses [79]. This integrated approach identified 275 differentially co-expressed genes extensively involved in the IL-17 signaling pathway, metabolic pathways, the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, Staphylococcus aureus infection, and complement and coagulation cascades [79]. The integration of bulk transcriptome data with single-cell resolution enabled the identification of cell-type specific expression patterns critical for understanding disease mechanisms.

Machine Learning-Based Biomarker Prioritization

Following initial identification, advanced computational methods are essential for prioritizing the most promising biomarkers from candidate lists. In the DFU study, researchers employed four machine learning models—Random Forest, Lasso, XGBoost, and SVM—to screen core genes from the candidate pool [79]. The dataset was partitioned into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%), with a 10-fold cross-validation approach applied to train the models [79].

The Random Forest model was implemented using the randomForest package in R to analyze predictor variables, resulting in the identification of the top 15 genes as hub genes based on importance ranking [79]. Predictions on the test set were further refined using LASSO regression, SGBoost, and SVM algorithms with 10-fold cross-validation to pinpoint key genes influencing patient prognosis [79]. This multi-model approach culminated in the identification of four core genes (CIB2, SAMHD1, DPYSL2, IFI44) with the highest predictive value for DFU progression and treatment response [79].

Experimental Validation Workflow

The transition from computational identification to biological validation requires a rigorous experimental workflow. The following diagram outlines the key stages in this process:

In the DFU study, experimental validation included establishing a rat model of diabetic foot ulcer, randomly divided into control, model, and treatment groups [79]. Tissue samples were collected at 3, 7, and 14 days post-intervention for RT-qPCR, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, Masson's trichrome staining, and immunofluorescence staining to evaluate therapeutic effects and verify modulation of the identified core genes [79]. Additionally, molecular docking simulations using Autodock software version 1.5.7 were conducted to assess binding interactions between macromolecular proteins encoded by the core genes and the therapeutic compound (quercetin), with results reported in terms of binding energy [79]. This comprehensive validation framework confirmed that quercetin enhances diabetic foot ulcer healing by modulating macrophage activity through regulation of SAMHD1 and DPYSL2 [79].

Advanced Applications and Integrative Approaches

Spatial Biology and AI-Powered Biomarker Discovery

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with spatial biology represents a cutting-edge advancement in biomarker discovery. Recent approaches combine high-plex spatial proteomics with AI-powered analysis to identify predictive biomarkers based on cellular spatial relationships [80]. In a melanoma study presented at SITC 2025, researchers used Bio-Techne's COMET platform with a 28-plex multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) panel to profile 42 pre-treatment biopsies from patients with metastatic melanoma [80]. Nucleai's multimodal spatial operating system then integrated high-plex imaging, histopathology, and clinical outcome data to identify distinct immune cell interactions correlated with progression-free survival, overall survival, and clinical benefit across different treatment arms [80].

This approach revealed that immune activation markers such as PD-L1+ CD8 T-cells and ICOS+ CD4 T-cells were linked to better outcomes in specific treatment sequences, while macrophage interactions in the outer tumor microenvironment indicated poorer prognosis [80]. The study demonstrated that spatial relationships between immune cells—their precise locations and interactions within the tumor microenvironment—significantly influence treatment success [80]. This exemplifies how modern biomarker discovery has evolved beyond simple expression levels to incorporate spatial, relational, and morphological data through AI-driven analysis.

Cross-Disease Applications and Regulatory Considerations

The application of volcano plots and biomarker prioritization extends across diverse therapeutic areas, including neurodegenerative disorders, where biomarkers have enabled accelerated approval of new therapies for Alzheimer's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as surrogate endpoints reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit [81]. In colorectal cancer, researchers recently identified FGFR4, FLT1, and WNT5A as key region-specific biomarkers through integrated analysis of bulk-RNA-sequencing data with secretome data [82]. This approach included constructing an interactome to visualize cell-to-cell interactions and pinpoint the most influential genes, followed by survival analysis and drug susceptibility assessments that identified dovitinib and nintedanib as promising targeted therapies [82].

A critical aspect in biomarker development is the establishment of context of use (CoU), which defines the specific application and intended purpose of a biomarker in drug development [78] [81]. Different applications—such as using a biomarker for patient selection versus monitoring disease progression—require distinct levels of validation and supporting data [78]. Regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA require rigorous evidence of analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility for biomarker qualification, often necessitating longitudinal studies and extensive validation cohorts [78].

Essential Research Tools and Reagents

The following table catalogs key research reagents and computational tools essential for implementing the biomarker discovery and validation workflows described in this guide:

Table 1: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Biomarker Discovery and Validation

Category	Tool/Reagent	Specific Function	Application Example
Bioinformatics Tools	OmicsVolcano [40]	Interactive visualization of high-throughput data without programming	Generate publication-ready volcano plots with highlighted gene sets
	DAVID [79]	Functional enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG pathways)	Identify biological processes and pathways enriched in significant genes
	CIBERSORT [79]	Deconvolution of immune cell populations from gene expression data	Analyze immune infiltration in disease tissues
Experimental Platforms	COMET Platform [80]	High-plex spatial biology with multiplex immunofluorescence	Profile 28+ biomarkers simultaneously in tissue sections
	GEO Database [79]	Public repository of functional genomics datasets	Access curated transcriptome and single-cell datasets (e.g., GSE80178, GSE134431)
Machine Learning Libraries	randomForest (R) [79]	Random Forest implementation for feature selection	Identify top genes based on importance ranking
	XGBoost [79]	Gradient boosting framework for predictive modeling	Enhance prediction accuracy for patient prognosis
Validation Reagents	Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panels [80]	Simultaneous detection of multiple protein markers	Identify immune cell interactions (e.g., PD-L1+ CD8 T-cells) in tumor microenvironment
	Molecular Docking Software (Autodock) [79]	Predict binding interactions between small molecules and proteins	Assess binding energy and stability of drug-target complexes

Quantitative Data Analysis and Interpretation Framework

Statistical Thresholds and Significance Criteria

Effective interpretation of volcano plots and biomarker prioritization requires understanding of established statistical thresholds across different data types. The following table summarizes key quantitative parameters from representative studies:

Table 2: Quantitative Thresholds for Biomarker Identification Across Study Types

Study Type	Fold Change Threshold	Significance Threshold	Validation Method	Key Identified Biomarkers
RNA-seq Analysis [2]	|log2FC| > 0.58 (FC > 1.5)	FDR < 0.01	RT-qPCR, IHC	Csn1s2b, Egf, Mcl1
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Multi-omics [79]	|log2FC| > 1.0	Adjusted p-value < 0.05	Machine learning, animal models, molecular docking	CIB2, SAMHD1, DPYSL2, IFI44
Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers [82]	Not specified	Not specified	Survival analysis, drug susceptibility	FGFR4, FLT1, WNT5A
Immunotherapy Spatial Analysis [80]	Spatial proximity and density	Correlation with PFS/OS	AI-powered spatial analysis	PD-L1+ CD8 T-cells, ICOS+ CD4 T-cells

Biomarker Classification and Clinical Applications

Understanding the clinical translation potential of identified biomarkers requires categorization based on their functional characteristics and applications:

Table 3: Biomarker Classification and Clinical Applications in Drug Development

Biomarker Category	Definition	Representative Examples	Clinical Application
Predictive Biomarkers [78]	Identify patients likely to respond to specific treatment	HER2 for trastuzumab [78], EGFR mutations [78], PD-L1 expression [78]	Patient selection for targeted therapies
Prognostic Biomarkers [78]	Provide information on disease progression regardless of treatment	TP53 and SMAD4 mutations in colorectal cancer [82]	Stratification of patients by disease aggressiveness
Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers [81]	Measure biological response to therapeutic intervention	Amyloid PET imaging in Alzheimer's trials [81]	Proof of mechanism in early clinical trials
Spatial Biomarkers [80]	Define cellular localization and interaction patterns	PD-1+ CD8 T-cells in tumor invasive margin [80]	Predicting immunotherapy response based on tumor microenvironment
Safety Biomarkers [78]	Identify potential adverse effects of treatments	Cardiac troponins for cardiotoxicity [78]	Monitoring drug safety in clinical trials

The field of biomarker discovery continues to evolve with emerging technologies, particularly through the integration of AI and machine learning algorithms that can analyze vast biological datasets to identify novel disease markers not apparent through conventional methods [78]. Digital biomarkers derived from wearable sensors and digital health technologies are also gaining recognition as tools for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in real-world settings [81]. As these technologies mature, they promise to further enhance the precision and efficiency of target identification and drug development, ultimately accelerating the delivery of more effective, personalized therapies to patients across diverse disease areas.

This case study explores the application of volcano plots in bioinformatics to identify and prioritize novel therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers for complex diseases, using diabetic nephropathy (DN) as a model condition. We demonstrate how this powerful visualization tool enables researchers to navigate high-dimensional omics data by integrating statistical significance with magnitude of biological effect. Our analysis reveals FOS as a promising diagnostic biomarker for DN and identifies emetine as a prospective therapeutic agent, providing a framework for applying similar methodologies to other complex diseases. The protocols and workflows detailed herein offer researchers a comprehensive guide for implementing volcano plot analysis within broader omics data visualization research.

Volcano plots have emerged as indispensable tools in therapeutic development, enabling rapid visual identification of biologically significant features from high-throughput omics experiments. These scatterplots display statistical significance (-log10 P value) versus magnitude of change (fold change), allowing researchers to simultaneously assess both the statistical reliability and biological relevance of observed differences [2]. In the context of complex disease research, this dual-axis visualization facilitates prioritization of candidate biomarkers and therapeutic targets from thousands of measured variables.

The analytical power of volcano plots stems from their ability to condense multidimensional data into an intuitive format that highlights features with both large effect sizes and high statistical significance [83]. In drug development, this enables researchers to focus resources on the most promising candidates, potentially accelerating the transition from basic research to clinical application. Our case study examines how this methodology successfully identified critical molecular targets in diabetic nephropathy, a complex disease with significant unmet clinical needs.

Theoretical Framework and Computational Tools

Statistical Foundations of Volcano Plots

Volcano plots integrate two fundamental statistical measures used in omics data analysis:

• Fold Change (FC): Represents the magnitude of difference between experimental groups, typically plotted on the x-axis as log2(FC) to center unchanged features at zero and symmetrically represent upregulation (right) and downregulation (left).
• P-value: Quantifies the statistical significance of observed differences, typically transformed as -log10(P value) on the y-axis to emphasize highly significant results at the top of the plot.

The combination of these metrics enables identification of features that are not only statistically significant but also biologically relevant, as large effect sizes often correspond to functionally important molecular changes in disease processes.

Software Implementation

Several computational tools facilitate volcano plot generation for researchers with varying programming expertise:

OmicsVolcano provides an interactive, open-source solution designed specifically for biologists without programming skills. This R Shiny-based application enables visualization and exploration of high-throughput biological data through an intuitive web interface [40]. Key features include:

• Interactive highlighting of genes/proteins associated with specific cellular processes
• Generation of publication-quality images in scalable vector graphic (SVG) format
• Direct visualization of gene ontologies linked to cellular processes
• Compatibility with output from common differential expression tools (DESeq2, edgeR, limma)

For computational researchers, multiple programming packages offer volcano plot capabilities:

• R packages: EnhancedVolcano, VolcanoR, ggplot2
• Python libraries: volcanic for catalysis applications [83]
• Galaxy platform: Point-and-click volcano plot tool for RNA-seq visualization [2]

Experimental Design and Methodologies

Data Acquisition and Preprocessing

The diabetic nephropathy case study utilized transcriptome data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, specifically datasets GSE96804 (glomeruli samples from 20 normal controls and 41 DN patients) and GSE142025 (kidney biopsy samples from 9 normal controls and 27 DN patients) [84]. Prior to analysis, data normalization was performed to ensure comparability across samples and platforms.

Quality Control Measures:

• Assessment of RNA integrity metrics
• Verification of sample clustering by experimental conditions
• Evaluation of batch effects and implementation of correction methods if needed
• Confirmation of normal distribution for expression values post-normalization

Differential Expression Analysis

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the "Limma" R package with thresholds of |log2FC| > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05 [84]. The analysis pipeline included:

This approach identified 44 upregulated and 74 downregulated DEGs common to both datasets, which were visualized using volcano plots to provide an overview of the transcriptional landscape in diabetic nephropathy [84].

Functional Enrichment and Pathway Analysis

Biological interpretation of DEGs was performed through functional enrichment analysis using the "clusterProfiler" R package, examining Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways [84]. Significantly enriched pathways included focal adhesion, ECM-receptor interaction, and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, providing insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying diabetic nephropathy progression.

Table 1: Key Functional Pathways Identified in Diabetic Nephropathy Analysis

Pathway Category	Specific Pathway	P-value	Genes Involved
KEGG	Focal adhesion	< 0.001	COL4A1, COL4A2, COL1A1
KEGG	ECM-receptor interaction	< 0.001	COL4A1, COL4A2, ITGA2
KEGG	PI3K-Akt signaling	< 0.01	COL4A1, COL4A2, ITGA2
Biological Process	Extracellular matrix organization	< 0.001	Multiple collagen genes
Biological Process	Inflammatory response	< 0.01	FOS, JUN, FGB

Biomarker Identification Using Machine Learning

Multiple machine learning algorithms were employed to identify robust diagnostic biomarkers from the DEGs:

LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) Regression:

• Implemented using the glmnet R package
• Performed feature selection to identify most predictive genes
• Used 10-fold cross-validation to determine optimal lambda parameter

Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE):

• Iteratively removed features with smallest weights
• Identified gene subsets with highest predictive power
• Evaluated performance using cross-validation accuracy

Random Forest:

• Constructed multiple decision trees using bootstrap samples
• Ranked features by mean decrease in Gini impurity
• Provided robust feature importance metrics

The intersection of features selected by all three algorithms identified FOS as a robust diagnostic biomarker for further validation [84].

Therapeutic Compound Screening

The Connectivity Map (cMAP) database was queried to identify potential therapeutic compounds that could reverse the disease-associated gene expression signature [84]. The cMAP database contains gene expression profiles from cell lines treated with various small molecules, enabling identification of compounds that induce opposite expression patterns to disease signatures.

cMAP Analysis Parameters:

• Used the 118 DEGs common to both DN datasets as query signature
• Calculated connectivity scores between -100 (perfect correlation) and 100 (perfect anti-correlation)
• Prioritized compounds with negative connectivity scores indicating reversal of disease signature
• Applied threshold of |connectivity score| > 90 for high-confidence candidates

This analysis identified emetine, a traditional anti-protozoal agent with potential anti-inflammatory properties, as a promising therapeutic candidate for diabetic nephropathy [84].

Case Study: Identification of FOS as a Diagnostic Biomarker in Diabetic Nephropathy

Analytical Validation of FOS

The application of volcano plot analysis combined with machine learning feature selection revealed FOS as a prominent diagnostic biomarker for diabetic nephropathy. FOS (FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog) encodes the c-Fos protein, a transcriptional factor that forms the AP-1 complex and regulates diverse cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [84].

Validation Approaches:

• Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis: Demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance of FOS with high sensitivity and specificity
• Cross-dataset Consistency: Confirmed decreased FOS expression in both GSE96804 and GSE142025 datasets
• Animal Model Validation: Verified reduced c-Fos expression in established DN mouse models

The volcano plots clearly visualized FOS as a statistically significant downregulated gene, facilitating its identification despite the hundreds of DEGs identified in the analysis.

Biological Rationale for FOS in Diabetic Nephropathy

The implication of FOS in diabetic nephropathy pathogenesis is supported by its established roles in:

• Inflammatory Pathways: FOS is a key regulator of inflammatory responses, which are central to DN progression [84]
• MAPK Signaling: Co-expression analysis revealed FOS association with MAPK signaling pathway, known to mediate renal injury in diabetes
• Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis: FOS participates in regulating cellular turnover in renal tissues

The downregulation of FOS in DN patients suggests potential disruption of these critical pathways, positioning FOS both as a diagnostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target.

Immune Infiltration Analysis

Single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) revealed significant immune dysregulation in DN patients, with altered infiltration levels of various immune cell types [84]. Correlation analysis demonstrated connections between FOS expression and immune cell profiles, suggesting potential mechanisms through which FOS might influence the renal microenvironment in diabetes.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Volcano Plot Analysis in Therapeutic Target Discovery

Reagent/Resource	Function/Application	Source/Reference
Limma R Package	Differential expression analysis	[84]
clusterProfiler R Package	Functional enrichment analysis	[84]
ggplot2 R Package	Volcano plot visualization	[84]
OmicsVolcano Software	Interactive volcano plot generation	[40]
String Database	Protein-protein interaction networks	[84]
Cytoscape with CytoHubba	Network analysis and hub gene identification	[84]
cMAP Database	Therapeutic compound prediction	[84]
GEO Datasets (GSE96804, GSE142025)	Disease transcriptome data	[84]

Experimental Protocols

Complete RNA-seq Differential Expression Protocol

Sample Preparation and Sequencing:

• Extract total RNA from tissue or cell samples using silica-based membrane columns
• Assess RNA quality using Bioanalyzer or TapeStation (RIN > 8.0 recommended)
• Prepare sequencing libraries using poly-A selection or rRNA depletion kits
• Sequence on Illumina platform to obtain minimum 30 million reads per sample

Bioinformatic Analysis:

• Quality control of raw reads using FastQC
• Adapter trimming and quality filtering with Trimmomatic or Cutadapt
• Alignment to reference genome using HISAT2 or STAR
• Gene-level quantification with featureCounts or HTSeq
• Differential expression analysis using DESeq2, edgeR, or limma-voom

Volcano Plot Generation:

Biomarker Validation Protocol Using qRT-PCR

RNA Reverse Transcription:

• Treat 1μg total RNA with DNase I to remove genomic DNA contamination
• Perform reverse transcription using random hexamers and Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase
• Dilute cDNA 1:5 with nuclease-free water for PCR amplification

Quantitative PCR:

• Prepare reaction mix containing SYBR Green master mix, gene-specific primers, and cDNA template
• Run amplification with following conditions: 95°C for 10min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15sec and 60°C for 1min
• Calculate relative expression using 2^(-ΔΔCt) method with normalization to housekeeping genes

Statistical Analysis:

• Perform Student's t-test for group comparisons
• Generate Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves to assess diagnostic performance
• Calculate area under curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals

In Vitro Compound Testing Protocol

Cell Culture and Treatment:

• Maintain relevant cell lines (e.g., RAW264.7 macrophages) in appropriate media with 10% FBS
• Culture cells at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere
• Treat cells with identified compound (emetine) at varying concentrations (0.1-10μM)
• Apply high glucose conditions (40mmol/L) to simulate diabetic environment

Transcriptome Analysis of Compound Effects:

• Extract total RNA after 24-hour treatment
• Perform RNA-seq library preparation and sequencing as described in section 5.1
• Identify differentially expressed genes following compound treatment
• Perform pathway enrichment analysis to elucidate mechanism of action

Data Visualization and Interpretation

Volcano Plot Interpretation Guidelines

Effective interpretation of volcano plots requires understanding key visual elements:

Threshold Lines:

• Vertical lines typically represent minimum fold change thresholds (e.g., |log2FC| > 1)
• Horizontal lines indicate statistical significance thresholds (e.g., -log10(0.05) = 1.3)

Point Coloring:

• Gray points: Non-significant features
• Blue points: Significant downregulation
• Red points: Significant upregulation

Biologically Relevant Regions:

• Upper-right: Significantly upregulated features with large effect size
• Upper-left: Significantly downregulated features with large effect size
• Upper-center: Statistically significant but modest effect size
• Lower-extremes: Large effect size but lacking statistical significance

In the DN case study, FOS was located in the upper-left quadrant, indicating significant downregulation with substantial effect size [84].

Workflow Visualization

Diagram 1: Integrated Workflow for Therapeutic Target Discovery

Signaling Pathway Visualization

Diagram 2: Molecular Mechanisms of FOS and Emetine in Diabetic Nephropathy

Results and Validation

Diagnostic Performance of FOS

The diagnostic capability of FOS for diabetic nephropathy was rigorously evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. FOS demonstrated excellent discrimination between DN patients and healthy controls with high sensitivity and specificity [84]. The downregulation of FOS expression was consistent across multiple validation cohorts and in an established DN mouse model, supporting its reliability as a diagnostic biomarker.

Performance Metrics:

• Area Under Curve (AUC): > 0.85 in both discovery and validation cohorts
• Sensitivity: > 80% at optimal cutoff
• Specificity: > 75% at optimal cutoff

Therapeutic Potential of Emetine

Transcriptome sequencing and experimental validation in RAW264.7 cells demonstrated that emetine, identified through cMAP analysis, suppressed M1 macrophage polarization by inhibiting activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [84]. Additionally, emetine treatment reduced expression of pro-inflammatory mediators Il-18 and Ccl5, suggesting a mechanism through which it might ameliorate inflammatory processes in diabetic nephropathy.

Table 3: Key Experimental Findings from Diabetic Nephropathy Case Study

Analysis Type	Key Finding	Biological Significance
Differential Expression	44 upregulated, 74 downregulated DEGs	Reveals extensive transcriptome alterations in DN
Pathway Analysis	Enrichment in focal adhesion, ECM-receptor interaction	Supports role of extracellular matrix remodeling in DN
Machine Learning Feature Selection	FOS identified as top diagnostic biomarker	Provides potential clinical utility for early detection
Immune Infiltration Analysis	Significant immune dysregulation in DN	Highlights inflammatory component of disease
cMAP Drug Prediction	Emetine as potential therapeutic candidate	Suggests repurposing opportunity for existing drug
Mechanistic Studies	Emetine inhibits NF-κB signaling	Elucidates anti-inflammatory mechanism of action

Discussion and Future Perspectives

The successful application of volcano plot analysis in identifying FOS as a diagnostic biomarker and emetine as a therapeutic candidate for diabetic nephropathy demonstrates the power of integrative bioinformatics approaches for complex disease research. The methodology outlined in this case study provides a reproducible framework that can be extended to other disease contexts where high-throughput omics data are available.

Advantages of Volcano Plot-Based Discovery

Multi-dimensional Data Integration: Volcano plots efficiently integrate statistical significance with effect size measurements, enabling prioritization of features with both biological relevance and statistical reliability. This dual-filter approach reduces false positives and highlights the most promising candidates for further investigation.

Hypothesis Generation: The visual nature of volcano plots facilitates pattern recognition and hypothesis generation that might be overlooked in purely numerical analysis. Cluster of points in specific regions can suggest coordinated biological processes or pathway-level alterations.

Accessibility: With tools like OmicsVolcano, researchers without computational backgrounds can generate and interpret volcano plots, democratizing access to advanced bioinformatics analyses [40].

Limitations and Considerations

Threshold Selection: Arbitrary threshold selection for significance and fold change can influence results. Researchers should consider their specific biological context when establishing cutoffs and perform sensitivity analyses to ensure robustness of findings.

Multiple Testing: In omics studies, the large number of simultaneous comparisons increases false discovery rates. Appropriate multiple testing corrections (e.g., Benjamini-Hochberg) are essential for valid inference.

Biological Context: Statistical significance does not necessarily imply biological importance. Findings from volcano plots should be interpreted within the broader biological context through integration with pathway analyses and functional validation.

Future Directions

The integration of volcano plots with emerging technologies presents exciting opportunities for therapeutic target discovery:

Multi-omics Integration: Combining transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data through layered volcano plots or parallel coordinate plots could provide more comprehensive understanding of disease mechanisms.

Temporal Dynamics: Longitudinal volcano plots tracking molecular changes across disease progression could identify stage-specific biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Artificial Intelligence Enhancement: Machine learning algorithms could enhance volcano plot interpretation by automatically detecting subtle patterns and relationships that might escape visual detection.

This case study demonstrates that volcano plots serve as powerful tools for navigating the complex landscape of omics data in therapeutic target discovery. Through the diabetic nephropathy example, we have illustrated a complete workflow from initial data analysis to biological validation, highlighting how FOS emerged as a diagnostic biomarker and emetine as a potential therapeutic agent. The integrated approach combining volcano plot visualization with functional enrichment analysis, machine learning, and experimental validation provides a robust framework for advancing precision medicine in complex diseases. As omics technologies continue to evolve and datasets expand, volcano plots will remain essential tools for transforming high-dimensional data into biological insights and clinical applications.

The field of omics research is undergoing a transformative shift, driven by the exponential growth of high-throughput biological data and the concurrent rise of sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies. Where researchers once relied on static visualizations and sequential analysis of single-omics datasets, we now stand at the convergence of interactive visualization, AI, and integrated multi-omics platforms. This triad represents a fundamental change in how we explore, interpret, and extract biological meaning from complex datasets. The volume and complexity of data generated from genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have surpassed the capabilities of traditional analytical methods [85]. In this new paradigm, AI-powered tools not only automate complex analytical tasks but also uncover hidden patterns and relationships within and across omics layers, while interactive visualization platforms transform these computational outputs into biologically intuitive and actionable insights [86]. This technical guide explores the core principles, methodologies, and tools defining this convergence, with a specific focus on its implications for visualizing omics data through established methods like volcano plots and beyond, providing researchers and drug development professionals with a roadmap for navigating this evolving landscape.

The Foundational Role of Visualization in Omics

The Volcano Plot: A Benchmark for Differential Analysis

The volcano plot remains an indispensable tool in omics research, providing a compact visualization that seamlessly integrates two critical dimensions of differential analysis: statistical significance and magnitude of change. This scatter plot displays the negative logarithm of the p-value (or q-value) against the log2 fold change, creating a characteristic volcano-like shape where the most biologically relevant features—those with large, statistically reliable changes—appear in the upper-left (downregulated) and upper-right (upregulated) regions [8]. Its strength lies in its ability to facilitate rapid prioritization of candidate biomarkers from thousands of measured features, streamlining the transition from raw data to biological hypothesis generation.

Standard interpretation involves scanning vertically for points with high statistical evidence (smaller p/q-values) and horizontally for points with large effect sizes (log2 fold change farther from zero). The combination of these dimensions allows researchers to triage features into upregulated, downregulated, and non-significant categories efficiently [8]. Common analytical thresholds include |log2FC| ≥ 1 (approximately 2-fold change) for effect size and q < 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR) for significance, though these should be pre-defined in the analysis plan rather than adjusted post-hoc to avoid "threshold hacking" and ensure reproducibility [8] [2].

Table 1: Standard Volcano Plot Interpretation Framework

Region on Plot	Statistical Meaning	Biological Implication
Upper-Right	Significant FDR (e.g., q < 0.05), Positive logâ‚‚FC (e.g., >1)	Promising upregulated biomarkers
Upper-Left	Significant FDR (e.g., q < 0.05), Negative logâ‚‚FC (e.g., < -1)	Promising downregulated biomarkers
Bottom Center	Non-significant FDR and/or small	Less likely to be biologically relevant
Lower-Right/Left	Large	magnitude of change but statistically unreliable; may indicate outliers or noise

Experimental Protocol: Generating a Volcano Plot from RNA-Seq Data

The generation of a robust volcano plot requires careful data preparation and statistical testing. The following protocol, adapted from a standard RNA-seq analysis workflow, outlines the key steps [2]:

• Differential Expression Analysis: Perform differential expression analysis using a tool such as limma-voom, edgeR, or DESeq2. The input is a normalized count matrix of gene expression across sample groups (e.g., case vs. control).

• Result File Preparation: Ensure the differential expression results file contains at minimum the following columns:

  • Raw P values
  • Adjusted P values (FDR)
  • Log2 Fold Change
  • Gene identifiers (e.g., symbols)

• Tool Execution: Utilize a dedicated volcano plot tool (e.g., in Galaxy, R). Key parameters to set include:

  • Input File: The results file from step 2.
  • P-value / FDR Column: Specify the column containing adjusted P-values.
  • Fold Change Column: Specify the column containing log2 fold change values.
  • Gene Label Column: Specify the column containing gene identifiers.
  • Significance Threshold: Set the FDR cutoff (e.g., 0.01).
  • Fold Change Threshold: Set the |log2FC| cutoff (e.g., 0.58 for ~1.5-fold change).

• Customization and Annotation:

  • For broad overviews, color all points passing the significance and FC thresholds.
  • To highlight top candidates, automatically label the top N most significant genes.
  • To investigate specific genes, provide a custom list of gene identifiers to be labeled on the plot, optionally with boxes for emphasis [2].

Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst in Omics

AI and Machine Learning Paradigms

Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), is revolutionizing omics data interpretation by moving beyond the limitations of traditional statistical models. ML focuses on developing algorithms that learn from data to perform tasks without explicit programming, categorized into supervised (for prediction and classification), unsupervised (for pattern discovery like clustering), and semi-supervised learning [85]. DL, a subset of ML, employs neural networks with multiple layers to uncover intricate representations of data, significantly improving classifier performance, especially with high-dimensionality datasets [85]. These approaches are uniquely suited to manage the high dimensionality, heterogeneity, and volume of multi-omics data, enabling the prediction of biological outcomes and the discovery of novel patterns that would be intractable through manual analysis [85] [87].

The applications are vast and impactful. For instance, AI is being used for genomic variant interpretation, protein structure prediction, and sophisticated single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis [87]. Tools like SLIDE (Significant Latent Factor Interaction Discovery and Exploration) use interpretable ML to discover mechanisms from high-dimensional multi-omics data, while DGMP employs a directed graph convolutional network to identify cancer driver genes from pan-cancer data [85] [87]. In a clinical context, models like MethylBoostER leverage ML on DNA methylation data to differentiate pathological subtypes of renal tumors, showcasing the translational potential of these methods [85].

Addressing the Core Challenges with AI

The implementation of AI in omics is not without significant challenges, but the field is rapidly developing solutions, as summarized in the table below.

Table 2: Key Challenges in AI for Omics and Emerging Solutions

Challenge	Description	AI-Driven Solutions & Considerations
Data Heterogeneity & Quality	Multi-omics data from different sources are noisy, heterogeneous, and often contain missing values [85].	Robust data preprocessing (normalization, batch correction), automated imputation strategies, and tools like DeepNoise that disentangle biological signal from experimental noise [85] [87].
The "Black Box" Problem	The complex architecture of many AI models, especially DL, lacks interpretability, hindering clinical translation and biological insight [85].	Development of Explainable AI (XAI). Models should provide transparency into data sources and decision drivers. Tools like those evaluated by Zhao et al. offer guidelines for improving model interpretability [87] [86].
Overfitting & Generalization	Models may perform well on training data but fail on new, unseen data due to the "curse of dimensionality" (more features than samples) [85].	Techniques like cross-validation, regularization, and ensemble learning. Frameworks like FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Intelligent, Reproducible) ensure data and model quality to improve generalization [85].
Statistical Guarantees in Visualization	Traditional FDR control can be jeopardized when using "fudge factors" (e.g., in volcano plots) to balance significance and effect size [88].	Competition-based FDR control methods, such as Knockoff filters and the target-decoy framework (as used in CurveCurator), provide statistical guarantees for biomarker selection from volcano plots [88].

Multi-Omics Data Integration: Strategies and Frameworks

The integration of data from multiple omics layers (genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) is essential for a holistic understanding of biological systems. The strategies for integration can be categorized based on the stage at which the data are combined, each with distinct advantages for ML applications [89].

Table 3: Multi-Omics Data Integration Strategies for Machine Learning

Integration Strategy	Methodology	Use-Case & Implications
Early Integration	All omics datasets are concatenated into a single matrix before being fed into a machine learning model [89].	Use-Case: Simple, straightforward integration when all data types are available for the same samples.Implication: Highly susceptible to the curse of dimensionality; model may struggle to learn complex interactions.
Mixed Integration	Each omics block is first independently transformed into a new representation (e.g., using dimensionality reduction) before being combined [89].	Use-Case: Managing data heterogeneity and reducing dimensionality prior to integration.Implication: Can preserve the unique characteristics of each data type while making integration more computationally tractable.
Intermediate Integration	The original datasets are simultaneously transformed into a joint latent space, learning common and omics-specific representations [89].	Use-Case: Capturing shared and complementary information across omics layers. Tools like SOPHIE use this to separate common and context-specific transcriptional responses [87] [89].
Late Integration	Each omics dataset is analyzed separately by a model, and the final predictions or results are combined (e.g., via voting) [89].	Use-Case: Leveraging domain-specific models for each data type.Implication: Does not model interactions between different omics layers during the learning process.
Hierarchical Integration	Integration is guided by prior biological knowledge of regulatory relationships between omics layers (e.g., genetic variation influences transcription) [89].	Use-Case: Incorporating known biological pathways to constrain and inform the integration model.Implication: Highly biologically driven but dependent on the quality and completeness of prior knowledge.

Essential Public Data Repositories

The development and validation of multi-omics and AI models rely on large, publicly available datasets. Key repositories include:

• The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): A comprehensive resource containing genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data for over 33 cancer types [90].
• International Cancer Genomics Consortium (ICGC): Coordinates large-scale generation of genomic studies across 76 cancer projects, with a focus on somatic and germline mutations [90].
• Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC): Provides proteomics data corresponding to TCGA tumor cohorts [90].
• Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE): A compilation of gene expression, copy number, and pharmacological drug response data from hundreds of human cancer cell lines [90].

The Converged Workflow: From Data to Insight

The true power of modern omics analysis is realized when interactive visualization, AI, and multi-omics integration are woven into a seamless workflow. This converged approach moves far beyond the capabilities of any single component.

Diagram 1: The converged workflow of AI, multi-omics integration, and interactive visualization, showing how raw data is transformed into actionable biological insight.

Table 4: Key Computational Tools and Platforms for Converged Omics Analysis

Tool / Resource Name	Category	Function & Application
Julius AI / ThoughtSpot	AI Data Visualization	Provides conversational, natural language interfaces to ask questions of data, automatically generate visualizations, and create reports, democratizing data access [91] [86].
Knockoff R Package	Statistical FDR Control	Implements knockoff filters for controlling the false discovery rate in feature selection, providing statistical rigor for biomarker discovery from volcano plots and other analyses [88].
SOPHIE	Multi-Omics AI Tool	Uses a generative neural network to separate common and context-specific transcriptional responses from integrated omics data [87].
DGMP	Multi-Omics AI Tool	A Directed Graph convolutional network and Multilayer Perceptron for identifying cancer driver genes from pan-cancer multi-omics data [87].
Galaxy	Analysis Platform	A web-based platform that provides accessible, tool-rich environments (e.g., for generating volcano plots) for bioinformatics analysis without requiring command-line expertise [2].
TCGA / CPTAC / ICGC	Data Repository	Public repositories providing the large-scale, multi-omics datasets necessary for training, testing, and validating AI models and generating new biological hypotheses [90].

A Protocol for Advanced, Statistically Rigorous Volcano Plot Analysis

Building on the basic protocol in Section 2.1, this advanced methodology incorporates AI-inspired statistical methods to enhance the rigor of biomarker selection from volcano plots, addressing the challenge of "fudging" the plot without proper FDR control [88].

• Standard Differential Analysis & Plotting: Perform steps 1-3 from the basic protocol to generate initial p-values, fold-change values, and a standard volcano plot.

• Define a Relevance Score with a Fudge Factor (sâ‚€): To create a single metric that blends statistical significance and effect size, calculate a relevance score for each feature. A common approach is: Relevance Score = |log2FC| / (standard_error + sâ‚€), where sâ‚€ is a tunable fudge factor. Tuning sâ‚€ allows you to weight the contribution of effect size and significance, effectively selecting biomarkers from the hyperbolic contours of the volcano plot's outer spray [88].

• Control FDR Using a Competition-Based Framework: Instead of applying the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to p-values (which is invalidated by a large sâ‚€), use a framework like Knockoff filters to control the FDR.

  • Generate Knockoffs: Create "knockoff" or "decoy" features that mimic the correlation structure of the real features but are known to be null (non-associated).
  • Compute Relevance Score for Knockoffs: Calculate the same relevance score for each knockoff feature.
  • Competition and Selection: For each real feature and its knockoff, see which has the higher score. The proportion of selected knockoffs among all selected features provides an estimate of the False Discovery Proportion. A threshold is applied to control the FDR at a desired level (e.g., 5%) [88].

• Interactive Visualization and Validation: Visualize the final selected biomarkers on an interactive volcano plot. These platforms allow users to click on points to see additional metadata, link selections to pathway databases, and share dynamic visualizations for collaborative validation.

The convergence of interactive visualization, artificial intelligence, and multi-omics data platforms marks a definitive shift from descriptive, single-layer analysis to predictive, integrative, and systems-level biological discovery. While foundational tools like the volcano plot remain critically relevant, their power is massively amplified when embedded within an AI-driven workflow that ensures statistical rigor and provides deeper, multi-optic context. The future of omics research and drug development will be led by those who can effectively leverage this integrated toolkit—using AI to manage complexity and uncover patterns, multi-omics integration to construct a holistic view, and interactive visualization to translate computational output into tangible biological insight and clinical action. As these fields continue to co-evolve, they promise to accelerate the pace of discovery from the bench to the bedside.

Conclusion

Volcano plots remain an indispensable tool for the initial visualization and interpretation of high-dimensional omics data, effectively balancing statistical significance with the magnitude of biological change. By moving beyond basic generation to embrace pathway-guided filtering and interactive exploration, researchers can uncover subtle yet biologically critical signals often hidden in crowded datasets. The integration of volcano plots into larger multi-omics workflows and drug discovery pipelines enhances their power, transforming raw data into validated insights on disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. As omics technologies continue to evolve, the future of visualization lies in platforms that seamlessly combine the intuitive appeal of tools like the volcano plot with advanced AI-driven analysis, paving the way for more efficient and profound discoveries in biomedical science.

References

• 1. (statistics) - Wikipedia Volcano plot [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcano_plot_(statistics)]
• 2. Transcriptomics / Visualization of RNA-Seq results with Volcano Plot / Hands-on: Visualization of RNA-Seq results with Volcano Plot [https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/transcriptomics/tutorials/rna-seq-viz-with-volcanoplot/tutorial.html]
• 3. | Partek Volcano Plot [https://help.partek.illumina.com/partek-flow/user-manual/visualizations/volcano-plot]
• 4. GitHub - ArrosanCodeLab/ Volcano _ plots _in_R [https://github.com/ArrosanCodeLab/Volcano_plots_in_R]
• 5. GraphBio: A shiny web app to easily perform popular visualization analysis for omics data - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9490469/]
• 6. kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano: Publication-ready volcano with... plots [https://github.com/kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano]
• 7. How to Create and Visualise Volcano in R - GeeksforGeeks Plot [https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/r-language/how-to-create-and-visualise-volcano-plot-in-r/]
• 8. in Metabolomics & Proteomics... - MetwareBio Volcano Plots [https://www.metwarebio.com/volcano-plot-metabolomics-proteomics-guide/]
• 9. Volcano plots in R: easy step-by-step tutorial - biostatsquid.com [https://biostatsquid.com/volcano-plots-r-tutorial/]
• 10. EnhancedVolcano... [https://www.cn-healthcare.com/articlewm/20210629/content-1237644.html]
• 11. Separate enrichment analysis of pathways for up- and downregulated genes - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3899863/]
• 12. How to Make Volcano in Excel Plot [https://www.thebricks.com/resources/guide-how-to-make-volcano-plot-in-excel]
• 13. and p-value Fold significantly alter microarray... change cutoffs [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3305783/]
• 14. Volcano Plot | Metabolon [https://www.metabolon.com/bioinformatics/volcano-plot/]
• 15. How to Create and Customize a Volcano in Plot | by... | Medium R [https://rstudiodatalab.medium.com/how-to-create-and-customize-a-volcano-plot-in-r-d874c7fb74fe]
• 16. Visual Omics: a web-based platform for omics data analysis and visualization with rich graph-tuning capabilities - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36458930/]
• 17. Hands-on: Visualization of RNA-Seq results with Volcano in... Plot [https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/transcriptomics/tutorials/rna-seq-viz-with-volcanoplot-r/tutorial.html]
• 18. function - RDocumentation EnhancedVolcano [https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/EnhancedVolcano/versions/1.11.3/topics/EnhancedVolcano]
• 19. Using Bioconductor for RNA - seq Differential... - Atlantbh Sarajevo [https://www.atlantbh.com/using-bioconductor-for-rna-seq-differential-expression-analysis/]
• 20. DESeq2 Input format [https://support.bioconductor.org/p/87311/]
• 21. Limma Voom R package [https://support.bioconductor.org/p/50051/]
• 22. limma_analyze: Differential Gene Expression Analysis using limma and voom in TransProR: Analysis and Visualization of Multi-Omics Data [https://rdrr.io/cran/TransProR/man/limma_analyze.html]
• 23. Differential expression analysis with inmoose, the integrated multi-omic... [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-025-06180-7]
• 24. GitHub - owkin/PyDESeq2: A Python implementation of the... [https://github.com/owkin/PyDESeq2]
• 25. GitHub - staslist/A-Lister: Tool for analysis of differentially ... expressed [https://github.com/staslist/A-Lister]
• 26. Hands-on: Pseudobulk Analysis with Decoupler and EdgeR... [https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/single-cell/tutorials/pseudobulk-analysis/tutorial.html]
• 27. A simple spreadsheet-based, MIAME-supportive format ... for [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-7-489]
• 28. WARDEN - St. Jude Cloud Docs [https://docs.stjude.cloud/genomics-platform/workflow-guides/warden]
• 29. in Volcano - Plots : How to Read and Interpret Them RNA Seq [https://olvtools.com/en/rnaseq/help/volcano-plot]
• 30. Step-by-Step Guide to Creating a Volcano - Plot RNA Seq [https://datascienceforbio.com/volcano-plot-rna-seq/]
• 31. Making volcano in python in Google Colab | The Coding Biologist plots [https://thecodingbiologist.com/posts/Making-volcano-plots-in-python-in-Google-Colab]
• 32. BEAVR: a browser-based tool for the exploration and visualization of RNA-seq data | BMC Bioinformatics | Full Text [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-020-03549-8]
• 33. Visualization methods for differential expression analysis | BMC Bioinformatics | Full Text [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-019-2968-1]
• 34. Infographic: RNA-Seq Data Visualization [https://www.formbio.com/blog/rna-seq-data-visualization-gene-therapy]
• 35. : An interactive tool for Pathway guided... Volcano pathway [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40581591/]
• 36. GitHub - thoconne/PathwayVolcano [https://github.com/thoconne/PathwayVolcano]
• 37. Combined Pathway Analysis - OmicsBox User Manual [https://docs.omicsbox.biobam.com/latest/Combined-Pathway-Analysis/]
• 38. 18. Gene set enrichment and pathway analysis — Single-cell best... [https://www.sc-best-practices.org/conditions/gsea_pathway.html]
• 39. Web-based multi-omics integration using the Analyst software suite | Nature Protocols [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41596-023-00950-4]
• 40. OmicsVolcano: software for intuitive visualization and interactive... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7821039/]
• 41. Help for package volcano 3D [https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/volcano3D/refman/volcano3D.html]
• 42. MODE: A Web Application for Interactive Visualization and Exploration of Omics Data - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39835806/]
• 43. How to Build Volcano Using Plotly for Quantitative... | Medium Plots [https://medium.com/omics-diary/building-volcano-plots-with-plotly-for-quantitative-analysis-of-omics-data-74e36f4cb8f8]
• 44. mavolcanoplot - Create significance versus gene expression ratio... [https://www.mathworks.com/help/bioinfo/ref/mavolcanoplot.html]
• 45. Orange Data Mining - undefined [https://orangedatamining.com/widget-catalog/bioinformatics/volcano_plot/]
• 46. GitHub - loukesio/ Interactive -Vizualization-4Bioinformatics [https://github.com/loukesio/Interactive-Vizualization-4Bioinformatics]
• 47. BTEP: Using EnhancedVolcano and ComplexHeatmap to visualize ... [https://bioinformatics.ccr.cancer.gov/btep/classes/using-enhancedvolcano-and-complexheatmap-to-visualize-omics-data]
• 48. Jitter Plots: Solving Overlapping in Scatter Plots Data [https://editverse.com/jitter-plots-solving-the-overlapping-data-problem-in-scatter-plots/]
• 49. 5 Best Ways to Avoid Points Jitter in Python Seaborn... Overlap without [https://blog.finxter.com/5-best-ways-to-avoid-points-overlap-without-jitter-in-python-seaborn-scatter-plots/]
• 50. Unlocking Cancer Insights with Volcano Plots [https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-volcano-plots-cancer-bioinformatics]
• 51. Statistical Analysis [https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/resources/vignettes/Statistical_Analysis_Module.html]
• 52. Simple tools for mastering color in scientific figures | The Molecular Ecologist [https://www.molecularecologist.com/2020/04/23/simple-tools-for-mastering-color-in-scientific-figures/]
• 53. Choosing color palettes for scientific figures - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7040535/]
• 54. Google Colors - Hex, RGB, CMYK, Pantone | Color Codes - U.S. Brand Colors [https://usbrandcolors.com/google-colors/]
• 55. Enhanced volcano : how to italicize or change the font of legend? [https://www.biostars.org/p/421102/]
• 56. GitHub - p-ruzycki/Atg5KO_LPS [https://github.com/p-ruzycki/Atg5KO_LPS]
• 57. MetaboAnalyst [https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/MetaboAnalyst/docs/UpdateHistory.xhtml]
• 58. DTAShiny: An Interactive R Shiny Application for... | F1000Research [https://f1000research.com/articles/14-1185]
• 59. How to change colour of points in volcano plot by common genes? [https://www.biostars.org/p/337778/]
• 60. 7.5 Volcano Plots | Proteomics Data Analysis in R/Bioconductor [https://pnnl-comp-mass-spec.github.io/proteomics-data-analysis-tutorial/volcano-plots.html]
• 61. How to Build a Volcano Plot in JMP! - JMP User Community [https://community.jmp.com/t5/Scott-Wise-s-Blog/How-to-Build-a-Volcano-Plot-in-JMP/ba-p/36490]
• 62. GitHub - avivleemann/volcanoPlot: creating a volcano in python... plot [https://github.com/avivleemann/volcanoPlot]
• 63. Google New Color Palette [https://www.color-hex.com/color-palette/51381]
• 64. Google Calculator Colour Scheme #5f6368, #80868b, #3c4043 - ColorsWall [https://colorswall.com/palette/154331]
• 65. ComplexHeatmap and Enhanced Volcano - BTEP Coding Club [https://bioinformatics.ccr.cancer.gov/docs/btep-coding-club/CC2023/complex_heatmap_enhanced_volcano/]
• 66. How to Use Venn in Diagrams : Interpretation, Tools, and Best... Omics [https://www.creative-proteomics.com/blog/index.php/venn-diagrams-in-omics-analysis/]
• 67. Analysis of Comparative and UpSetR in Venn ... Diagrams Omics Data [https://www.metwarebio.com/venn-diagrams-vs-upsetr-omics-data-analysis/]
• 68. xOmicsShiny: an R Shiny application for cross- omics analysis... data [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12117368/]
• 69. Identifying significantly impacted pathways: a comprehensive review and assessment | Genome Biology | Full Text [https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-019-1790-4]
• 70. Ten simple rules for creating reusable pathway models for computational analysis and visualization - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8375987/]
• 71. A novel signaling pathway impact analysis [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18990722/]
• 72. Consideration of Statistical vs. Biological for Omics... Significances [https://mo.hapres.com/htmls/Mo_879_Detail.html]
• 73. Chapter 8 Color Palette | Single Cell Multi-Omics Data Analysis [https://bookdown.org/ytliu13207/SingleCellMultiOmicsDataAnalysis/color-palette.html]
• 74. Molecular Perspectives: Strategies for Comprehensive... Integrating [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11592251/]
• 75. Frontiers | Integrated , transcriptomic , and proteomic ... metabolomic [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2025.1574858/full]
• 76. 3 Omics : a web-based systems biology tool for analysis, integration ... [https://bmcsystbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1752-0509-7-64]
• 77. Visualization of three-way comparisons of omics data | BMC Bioinformatics | Full Text [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-8-72]
• 78. The Biomarker Revolution in Medicine and Drug Development [https://www.pharmasalmanac.com/articles/the-biomarker-revolution-in-medicine-and-drug-development]
• 79. Frontiers | Identification of biomarkers and potential drug in... targets [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1561179/full]
• 80. AI-Powered Spatial Biology Workflow from Bio-Techne and Nucleai Enables Predictive Biomarker Discovery in Melanoma Patients [https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ai-powered-spatial-biology-workflow-from-bio-techne-and-nucleai-enables-predictive-biomarker-discovery-in-melanoma-patients-302604119.html]
• 81. Biomarker-guided decision making in clinical drug development for neurodegenerative disorders | Nature Reviews Drug Discovery [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41573-025-01165-w]
• 82. New Biomarkers , Drug for Colorectal Cancer | AJMC Targets Identified [https://www.ajmc.com/view/new-biomarkers-drug-targets-identified-for-colorectal-cancer]
• 83. Constructing and interpreting volcano plots and activity maps to navigate homogeneous catalyst landscapes - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35978038/]
• 84. Unveiling FOS as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker | JIR [https://www.dovepress.com/unveiling-fos-as-a-potential-diagnostic-biomarker-and-emetine-as-a-pro-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JIR]
• 85. Artificial intelligence for omics data analysis | BMC Methods | Full Text [https://bmcmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s44330-024-00004-5]
• 86. Top 5 AI Tools for Data Visualization to Consider in 2025 [https://www.thoughtspot.com/data-trends/ai/ai-tools-for-data-visualization]
• 87. Artificial Intelligence in Omics - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10025753/]
• 88. Fudging the volcano - plot without dredging the data [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45834-7?error=cookies_not_supported&code=0bceaa3b-0146-4fe7-9aa6-b0958b44b4d9]
• 89. Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis - ScienceDirect [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037021002683]
• 90. Multi-omics Data Integration, Interpretation, and Its Application - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7003173/]
• 91. for Data Analysis | Top 7 AI Data AI Tools for Visualization 2025 [https://julius.ai/articles/top-7-ai-data-visualization-tools-for-2025]